Press TV, on Iran, 25 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Iran’s Baghaei as Rubio forgets Trump’s ‘pirates’ boast over ship seizures

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei has highlighted the stark hypocrisy in Washington’s latest accusations against Tehran.

In a post on X on Sunday, Baghaei pointed out that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s claims about Iranian actions against commercial shipping conveniently ignore President Donald Trump’s own proud admission that American forces operate “like pirates.”

He responded to Rubio’s recent remarks in which the US secretary of state, accusing Iran of attacking ships, said: “We haven’t seen anything like this since World War II and the pirates of the Caribbean.”

Baghaei juxtaposed this with Trump’s May 1, 2026, comments, made while boasting about the seizure of commercial ships and the confiscation of oil cargoes amid the US naval blockade of Iranian ports: “We’re like PIRATES. We’re sort of like PIRATES.”

“Perhaps the president won’t be too pleased to learn that his secretary of state has so quickly forgotten his own proud claim of being like pirates,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman wrote.

Marco Rubio, accusing Iran of attacking ships، said: “We haven’t seen anything like this since World War II and the pirates of the Caribbean.”

— Esmaeil Baqaei (@IRIMFA_SPOX) October 25, 2026

U.S. President, on 1 May 2026, boasting about seizing commercial ships and confiscating oil cargoes: “we’re like PIRATES. We’re sort of…

The exchange comes as in the Strait of Hormuz, claiming in recent interviews that Tehran is targeting commercial vessels in a manner reminiscent of Nazi U-boat tactics during the Second World War.

US officials have simultaneously asserted that shipping volumes through the strategic waterway have largely recovered due to American military escorts, while calling for continued “extraordinary economic pressure” on Iran.

Iranian officials reject this narrative as a deliberate inversion of reality. The root of the insecurity in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, Tehran maintains, lies in the unprovoked US-Israeli aggression that began on February 28, which included strikes on Iranian territory, civilian casualties, and the subsequent imposition of an illegal naval blockade on Iranian ports.

Under that blockade, US forces intercepted and seized multiple Iranian oil tankers in international waters .

Baghaei had previously condemned these actions as “the outright legalization of piracy and armed robbery on the high seas.

He wrote, “Welcome to the return of the pirates — only now, they operate with government-issued warrants, sail under official flags, and call their plunder ‘law enforcement.’”

Trump himself later celebrated the seizures, describing the takeover of ships, cargo, and oil as “a very profitable business” and openly stating that US forces were “sort of like pirates but we are not playing games.”

Iranian judiciary officials have noted that the US president “openly confessed to acts of piracy,” contrasting this with Iran’s own actions in the Strait of Hormuz, .

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Press TV reports a post on X in which Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei sets Marco Rubio's piracy accusation against Donald Trump's own 'like pirates' remarks. In its own voice the outlet adopts Baghaei's verdict of US hypocrisy and calls the legal basis for the US tanker seizures a 'pretext'. It closes on an unchallenged description of Iran's own ship actions as lawful, though the article itself reports the US accusation that Iran is attacking ships.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “under the pretext of unilateral American court warrants tied to Washington’s extraterritorial sanctions regime”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice Press TV calls the US court warrants a "pretext". That word asserts the stated legal basis is not the real reason for the seizures.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the warrants were a cover story and that the seizures had no genuine legal basis.
    The context
    This is Iran's position, which Baghaei has put in his own words. Press TV gives no attribution in this sentence and offers no US account of the legal basis.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the outright legalization of piracy and armed robbery on the high seas”

    Show it in the article

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “which are carried out under domestic court orders and in accordance with international law to enforce regulations against vessels violating passage rules”

    Why this matters
    The article ends on a relative clause that describes Iran's own actions against ships as lawful. Nothing is set against it, and the clause reads as the outlet's description rather than the judiciary officials' claim.
    The impression it gives
    A reader leaves believing Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz are settled as lawful enforcement.
    The context
    The article itself reports that the US accuses Iran of attacking commercial ships. The lawfulness of Iran's actions is the very point in dispute.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“claiming in recent interviews that Tehran is targeting commercial vessels”
    • Elsewhere in the article“accusing Iran of attacking ships”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iranian judiciary officials said Iran's own actions in the strait follow domestic court orders and international law; the US accuses Iran of attacking commercial ships.

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “exposes US hypocrisy”

    Why this matters
    The headline uses "exposes", which treats US hypocrisy as an established fact that Baghaei uncovered rather than a charge he made.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the hypocrisy as proven before reading the body.
    The context
    The body reports a juxtaposition Baghaei drew in a post on X. Hypocrisy is his verdict, put in his own words in the body.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman wrote”

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Rubio has intensified efforts to portray Iran as the aggressor”

    Why this matters
    Press TV describes Rubio's accusation as "efforts to portray". That casts his statements as image-making rather than reporting what he says.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Rubio's claims as a deliberate distortion before any evidence is weighed.
    The context
    The article gives no evidence about Rubio's purpose. It only shows that he made the accusation in interviews.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 25 OctIran3.0
  2. 25 OctIran3.0
  3. 25 OctQalibaf: Any violation of Iran’s territory will trigger response ‘beyond enemy’s imagination’3.0
  4. 25 OctIranian Army intercepts, shoots down US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas3.0
  5. 25 Oct‘Nothing will be the same’: Araghchi says Hormuz management will never return to pre-war era6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV

See how 15 outlets covered this story