LBC, on UK Politics, 31 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Britain , - as they accuse Burnham's budget of 'kicking can down the road'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Former generals have blasted the Government's "lack of urgency" over defence spending, as they accused John Healey's budget of "kicking the can down the road". At the Budget on Wednesday, Chancellor John Healey filled a £4.7 billion black hole in the defence investment plan, a blueprint that takes Britain’s defence spending to 2.7% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2027. He also committed to spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030 as a step towards meeting Britain’s commitment to Nato to spend 3.5% by 2035.

But the Chancellor said details of where this cash will come from will be left until the spending review, pencilled in for next autumn. Read more: 'Damned if you do, damned if you don't': Defence Secretary defends Healey over post-Budget pint Read more: Brits will be asked to make ‘sacrifices’ and help defend the nation as Army chief warns troops: ‘Our nation is going to need you’ It comes after Defence Secretary Wes Streeting insisted the Government is doing “as much as we can, as fast as we can” to increase defence funding.

Lord Dannatt, who was chief of the general staff between 2006 and 2009, told The Telegraph: “Once again the Government is using ‘creative accounting’ instead of finding real money. “Russia is serious, we are not. Deterring aggression by being prepared for war is the best way to keep this country safe. Find the money now, don’t kick the can down the track for another year.” General Sir Peter Wall, who was in the post from 2010 to 2014, warned that the armed forces are “hobbled by dismal resources” and said investment to rebuild them is “long overdue”.

“Three per cent by 2030 won’t deliver proper capability uplift much before 2035. We have no idea how or when that money will be spent. It’s an aspiration, not a commitment. “The lack of strategic urgency is shocking and will only embolden our opponents.” Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, chairman of the Commons Defence Committee, had told MPs the wait for more detail is too long. He said key decisions on defence spending have “lamentably been delayed” until next year’s spending review and there is a “cost to inaction”.

Mr Streeting told BBC Breakfast: “I think we are doing as much as we can, as fast as we can. The biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War.” He also signalled that other areas of Government spending could face constraints as a means of filling defence coffers.

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

LBC reports former generals' criticism of the Government's defence spending, attributes each quote to a named source and gives the Defence Secretary's reply. The headline goes slightly beyond the body: it puts 'not prepared for war' in quotation marks although nobody in the article says those words, and it calls the critics 'army chiefs' when the body makes clear they are former generals.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'not prepared for war'”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts the words 'not prepared for war' in quotation marks, as if a general had said them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that one of the generals used that exact phrase about Britain.
    The context
    No one in the article says those words. Lord Dannatt says 'Russia is serious, we are not' and that being prepared for war deters aggression. The quoted phrase is LBC's own paraphrase dressed as a quotation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Russia is serious, we are not.”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Deterring aggression by being prepared for war is the best way”

    Show it in the article

    “army chiefs warn”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the critics 'army chiefs' and drops the word former.
    The impression it gives
    A reader may think serving army leaders are warning the Government in public.
    The context
    The body names them as former generals who held the top army post between 2006 and 2014.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Former generals have blasted the Government's”
    • Elsewhere in the article“who was in the post from 2010 to 2014”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Lord Dannatt, who was chief of the general staff between 2006 and 2009, told The Telegraph”

    It names the speaker, gives his former role and dates, and credits the outlet that first carried the quote.

  • “Mr Streeting told BBC Breakfast”

    It gives the Government's reply in the Defence Secretary's own words with a clear source, so the generals' criticism is answered.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 31 OctBurnham 'open' to calls for Britain to offer apology for slavery - but rules out reparations3.0
  2. 30 OctChancellor John Healey downs pint after delivering first Budget0.0
  3. 30 OctRoyal British Legion stands by rainbow flag poppy after Reform councillor slammed LGBT remembrance symbol0.0
  4. 30 OctRoyal British Legion stands by rainbow flag poppy after Reform councillor slammed LGBT remembrance symbol0.0
  5. 30 OctBrexit has been 'good for London', Sir James Cleverly says - as he blasts PM for re-opening 'divisive row' on EU membership0.0

Everything we scored from LBC