Evening Standard, on UK Politics, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

North London council failed vulnerable woman before she died in hotel, inquest finds

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

A 31-year-old woman who died the day she was released from prison was failed by a North London council and others responsible for her care, possibly contributing to her death, an inquest has found. The “extremely vulnerable” Colleen Madden left prison for the fourth time in the space of five months on January 13, 2025. She had been convicted of violent offences but was recalled to prison several times after her initial release in September 2024.

Colleen was born and raised in Camden , and had lived with ADHD , trauma and learning disabilities. In the years leading up to her imprisonment, the mother of two had repeatedly experienced homelessness , physical and sexual harm and substance dependency. She also sustained a “life-changing” brain injury following a road traffic accident in 2018, roughly six years before she left prison for the first time. Despite positive rehabilitation after the accident, the deaths of her father shortly after and her sister in 2023 led to her “crisis and relapse”, an official report stated.

After she was released from HMP Bronzefield in January 2025, Colleen presented to Camden’s adult social care services where she underwent what the coroner described as an “inadequate and confused assessment”. That evening the council placed her alone in an interim hotel in King’s Cross, with no support arrangements in place. Colleen was found dead on January 16, 2025. Medical evidence indicated she had died shortly after she came to the hotel.

Social workers had tried to visit her on January 15, but her body was not discovered until police gained entry to the room the following day. At an inquest held in October 2026, Assistant Coroner Melanie Lee concluded that Colleen was “let down” by agencies in what she described as a “chain of missed opportunities”. Camden Council came under fire for placing her in “unsuitable accommodation in an unsuitable location”. Had the council fulfilled its statutory duties, Ms Lee added, she may not have died in the place and manner that she did.

Following the inquest, Colleen’s family said: “We miss our sister beyond words. She was our everything, and she deserved compassion, dignity, and proper care. Instead, we feel she became little more than an administrative task, with no one taking responsibility for her needs.” “The inquest has highlighted the importance of proper training for those working with vulnerable adults, so that no other woman has to endure what Colleen did,” they added.

Camden Council said it has since improved support for prison leavers and information sharing between the council, probation services and other partner agencies, progressing an action plan overseen by CSAB. “Our deepest sympathies remain with Colleen’s family and friends following her tragic death. Ensuring vulnerable residents are supported and safeguarded is a responsibility that we take extremely seriously,” a spokesperson told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS).

The Safeguarding Adults Review (SAR) report noted that Colleen’s “rapid” recalls were due to her being evicted from bail hostels for “aggressive” behaviour, which was not viewed through the lens of trauma. In September 2024, the council’s housing department decided she lacked capacity to make a homelessness application. This meant the duty to accommodate her shifted to adult social care (ASC), who accepted their responsibility but did not communicate this clearly in writing.

Without confirmation, the other agencies assumed ASC had rejected its duty. In mid-to-late December 2024, The Probation Service requested a Care Act assessment, but the prison failed to act on this before her release. The Prison and Probation Ombudsman (PPO) said it referred Colleen’s case to the council the same month, but the council had no record of this on its systems. Social workers had conducted a brief, single interaction with Colleen at the council offices on December 31, 2024, which judged she had mental capacity.

But this failed to check if this was in flux, or for any cognitive impairment stemming from her brain injury and substance dependency. The prison later called an urgent pre-release meeting for Colleen on January 10, three days before her release. Camden did not send a representative from adult social care because of the short notice, the council said, adding that the prison had only revealed “very late” she was due for release after 12 days’ recall.

Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Evening Standard reports an inquest finding that Camden Council and other agencies failed Colleen Madden, who died in a hotel the day she left prison. It names the council as the actor, sources the failures to the coroner and the safeguarding review, and gives her family space. One lapse: it ends by stating the council's late-notice excuse in its own voice, although the article itself reports that the council had her case weeks before her release.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Because of the late notice, social care services booked her into a temporary hotel for one week.”

    Why this matters
    The words "Because of the late notice" turn the council's own explanation, attributed in the sentence before, into the outlet's statement of cause. The article then ends on it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader finishing the piece comes away thinking the hotel placement was mainly forced by short notice from the prison.
    The context
    Late notice is Camden's account. The article itself reports that adult social care took on the duty to house her in September 2024, that probation asked for a Care Act assessment in December, and that the ombudsman says it referred her case to the council that month. The coroner found the council failed its statutory duties.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the prison had only revealed “very late” she was due for release”
    • Elsewhere in the article“referred Colleen’s case to the council the same month”
    • Elsewhere in the article“who accepted their responsibility but did not communicate this clearly in writing”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Had the council fulfilled its statutory duties”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “That evening the council placed her alone in an interim hotel in King’s Cross, with no support arrangements in place.”

    It names the council as the actor and states plainly what it did, rather than saying she was simply housed somewhere.

  • “Had the council fulfilled its statutory duties, Ms Lee added, she may not have died in the place and manner that she did.”

    It reports the coroner's finding on the council's responsibility directly and attributes it to her by name.

  • “Instead, we feel she became little more than an administrative task, with no one taking responsibility for her needs.”

    It gives the bereaved family their own words on how the agencies treated her.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Evening Standard

  1. 29 OctLib Dems accuse Farage of ‘shoving’ MP, after Reform leader spoke of altercation0.0
  2. 29 OctHorrifying moment man throws petrol bomb at migrant hotel in north London0.0
  3. 29 OctAndy Burnham: My 'London Deal' with Sadiq Khan to fire up the capital3.0
  4. 29 OctDUP party officers to meet amid ongoing fall-out over Drumcree dispute0.0
  5. 29 Oct‘Budget is bold enough’ despite limited ‘room for manoeuvre’, Andy Burnham says3.0

Everything we scored from Evening Standard