We do not republish articles from The Scotsman. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
This is a Remembrance column by the Scottish Conservative MSP Murdo Fraser. It argues that remembrance should include surviving veterans and that Northern Ireland veterans are badly treated by the Troubles Bill. Its argument is not a finding. The one problem is minor: the headline says veterans are 'facing prosecution', when the body says only that they could face it if new evidence emerges.
Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.
Headline goes beyond the article
Minor
“N Ireland veterans facing prosecution”
Why this matters
The headline calls the veterans 'N Ireland veterans facing prosecution', as if prosecutions were under way or pending.
The impression it gives
A reader who sees only the headline believes Northern Ireland veterans are now being taken to court under the new bill.
The context
The body says only that the bill would mean veterans 'could now face criminal prosecution' if new evidence emerges. It names no prosecution and no veteran facing one.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“meaning that veterans could now face criminal prosecution if “credible and compelling new evidence” emerges”
Elsewhere in the article“are deeply concerned about the prospect of vexatious investigations”