Daily Mail, on Climate, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Labour MP savages Burnham's ban on North Sea oil drilling

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

A Labour MP has accused Andy Burnham of a 'hypocritical and pointless' ban on further North Sea oil drilling. The Prime Minister will press ahead with legislation to prevent future development off the Scottish coast despite previously vowing to be 'pragmatic' on the issue. But his backbenchers have criticised the decision as a poll showed Labour supporters back more drilling, including at the Rosebank oil field off Shetland. Henry Tufnell, the Labour MP for Mid and South Pembrokeshire, accused the PM of 'an act of self–harm' in championing the legislation.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says the bill fulfils Labour's manifesto commitment to issue no new oil and gas licences. It says only that Burnham presses ahead 'despite previously vowing to be pragmatic'. A reader comes away thinking the ban breaks a promise, when it carries out a pledge the party was elected on.

How we know

He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'We are prepared to import gas from the US, we're prepared to import gas that has been drilled in Norway, but we are not prepared to drill our own oil and gas in the North Sea and bring in the economic benefits from tax receipts and support jobs there. 'There is a hypocrisy there that I really struggle to get my head around.' He added: 'We think that energy security is national security, we think it can bring huge benefits for economic growth and ultimately protect lots of jobs.'

He said his party needed to adapt to an 'ever–changing world' as he argued that energy security was vital. Andy Burnham is set to proceed with legislation blocking new oil and gas developments off the Scottish coast, despite previously pledging to take a 'pragmatic' approach Henry Tufnell, Labour MP for Mid and South Pembrokeshire, said it made little sense for Britain to import oil and gas from countries such as the US and Norway while refusing to develop its own reserves 'The important thing to recognise here is the fact that we've got conflict in the Middle East, we have conflict in Ukraine,' he said. 'We live in a world where energy security has rocketed up the geopolitical agenda as a result of these threats and we have to respond accordingly.

I find the whole thing very strange.' Mr Tufnell and Steve Yemm, the Labour MP for Mansfield, have founded the cross–party Industry First pressure group to support new oil and gas drilling. It came after Labour published the Energy Independence Bill which will block future licences despite the cost–of–living crisis. The law change will not affect the decision on Rosebank because it was approved in 2023 before being legally challenged. A poll found that nearly two–thirds of Labour supporters want to see the Government endorse the project after gas field Jackdaw was given the go–ahead last month.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Only the bill's critics speak, and the article never gives the government's stated purpose: cutting reliance on fossil fuels, building cheap, green power and meeting climate targets. Without it a reader is left with the MP's verdict that the ban is pointless self-harm, as if it had no aim at all.

How we know

found 65 per cent of those who backed Labour in the 2024 general election want to see Rosebank get the green light. It is the largest undeveloped oil field in UK waters and its future has split the Cabinet, with the Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh suggesting she is not minded to approve it. Less than a fifth (17 per cent) of the party's voters agree with Ms Fahnbulleh's reported view on Rosebank. However, 68 per cent of Labour supporters backed her decision to approve the Jackdaw gas field.

Meanwhile, 72 per cent of those who voted for the party in 2024 agreed that oil and gas are 'essential for the foreseeable future'.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Daily Mail puts 'hypocritical and pointless' in quotation marks in its headline, though the MP it quotes never says 'pointless'. It cites a poll paid for by Offshore Energies UK without saying it is the North Sea oil and gas trade body. It also lets only the bill's critics speak, never giving the government's stated reasons or saying the bill fulfils a manifesto pledge.

  1. Hides who the source is

    Serious

    “Polling for Offshore Energies UK”

    Why this matters
    The Mail names Offshore Energies UK as the poll's sponsor and says nothing about what it is.
    The impression it gives
    The poll figures that close the article come from a neutral source.
    The context
    Offshore Energies UK is the trade association for North Sea oil and gas companies and runs the Back the North Sea campaign. It has a direct interest in the result. The article never says so, and S3 and S15 present the poll with no sponsor named at all.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Polling commissioned by Offshore Energies UK, the North Sea oil and gas trade body, found 65 per cent of 2024 Labour voters want Rosebank approved.

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'hypocritical and pointless'”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts 'hypocritical and pointless' in quotation marks as Henry Tufnell's verdict on the ban.
    The impression it gives
    The MP called the ban hypocritical and pointless in those words.
    The context
    In the quotes the article gives, Tufnell says 'There is a hypocrisy there', calls it 'an act of self-harm' and finds it 'very strange'. He is never quoted saying 'pointless', so the headline presents a paraphrase as his words.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“There is a hypocrisy there that I really struggle to get my head around.”
    • Elsewhere in the article“I find the whole thing very strange.”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says the bill fulfils Labour's manifesto commitment to issue no new oil and gas licences. It says only that Burnham presses ahead 'despite previously vowing to be pragmatic'. A reader comes away thinking the ban breaks a promise, when it carries out a pledge the party was elected on.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Only the bill's critics speak, and the article never gives the government's stated purpose: cutting reliance on fossil fuels, building cheap, green power and meeting climate targets. Without it a reader is left with the MP's verdict that the ban is pointless self-harm, as if it had no aim at all.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 5 NovFinally, Swinney breaks with Sturgeon... and backs drilling in the North Sea6.0
  2. 5 NovSobbing dad, 34, FaceTimed wife and said: 'I don't know what to do,' as floodwaters surrounded his car moments before he drowned6.0
  3. 5 NovMonster storm sweeps toward East Coast with 120 million Americans in its path as flash floods swallow homes and force immediate evacuations6.0
  4. 4 NovIt's a Net Zero from the Strictly judges! Eco zealot Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband shows off his dancefloor moves during Caribbean trip (before realising he's being filmed…)3.0
  5. 4 NovSpy under the bonnet: Labour to use electric cars' satnavs to record mileage and calculate road tax6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail