Reuters, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran has detailed plans to hit Gulf undersea cables if war resumes, officials say

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Summary Companies Iran plans wider retaliation if war resumes, officials say Iran threatens undersea cables, would try to stop repairs Hormuz cable attacks could disrupt Gulf networks Global impact would be limited, analysts say DUBAI, Oct 23 (Reuters) - Tehran has drawn up detailed plans to target undersea communications cables in the Gulf if the United States and Israel attack Iran again, two senior Iranian security officials ​told Reuters.

Their comments followed warnings by Iranian officials that undersea cables in the region could become targets in any renewed conflict if diplomacy with Washington ‌collapses. Sign up here. The two Iranian security officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, gave few details and did not say how or where exactly Tehran would carry out such attacks. But one of them said Iran would aim to prevent repairs after any attacks to prolong disruptions to communications, including internet connections.

"If Iran is attacked, there will be no more red lines ... from undersea cables to military bases, including covert ones," one ​of the officials said. The official warned Washington not to "play with fire", and said Iran had full access to the undersea cables and could easily destroy them. Yadollah ​Javani, the deputy head of political affairs for Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), said on Wednesday that Iran could target seven major internet cables beneath ⁠the Strait of Hormuz if Iranian infrastructure came under attack.

Undersea cables carry around 99% of global internet traffic, according to the International Telecommunication Union, a UN agency. But the ​global impact of such attacks by Iran could be limited as less than 1% of international bandwidth passes through the Strait of Hormuz, said Alan Mauldin, research director at telecommunications ​research firm TeleGeography. The strait separates Iran and Oman, linking the Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea.

The US Department of State and Iran's Foreign Ministry did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the Iranian security officials' remarks. There was no immediate comment from Gulf states. 'STRONGER RESPONSE' The plans for possible attacks on undersea cables . Top security official Mohsen Rezaei warned this month that US-linked digital infrastructure across the Gulf, including data centres and ​AI facilities, could be targeted in a renewed conflict.

Item 1 of 2 Vessels at the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, October 23, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer [1/2] Vessels at the Strait of Hormuz, as seen from Musandam, Oman, October 23, 2026. REUTERS/Stringer Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab Washington's Gulf allies have invested heavily in such infrastructure and they "should hold Washington, not Tehran, responsible for any damage to undersea cables," the second Iranian ‌security official ⁠said.

Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran program at the Middle East Institute in Washington, said such threats were intended to deter renewed conflict and put pressure on Washington by making Gulf governments and US companies fear for their investments in the region. "Tehran wants Gulf states and corporate executives to press (US President Donald) Trump over the risks his policies pose to their investment plans," said Vatanka. Cable routes are stylized and do not reflect the actual positions (Source: TeleGeography) Multiple cable cuts could slow internet services and disrupt financial transactions, e-commerce and cloud computing, analysts said.

The impact would depend on how operators rerouted traffic and ​the capacity available on alternative connections, Mauldin said. Restoring ​connections during wartime could be difficult, ⁠experts said, and higher insurance costs and delays in obtaining permits to enter territorial waters could further complicate repairs. The Red Sea could offer a more significant target than the Strait of Hormuz, particularly if Iran had support from its Houthi allies in Yemen, though Tehran ​has made no public statement indicating it plans to target cables there.

The Red Sea carries data between Europe, East Africa and ​Asia, with capacity routed ⁠through it accounting for about 3% of global international demand and around 10% of traffic travelling between regions, Mauldin said. Cable routes are stylized and do not reflect the actual positions (Source: TeleGeography) Gulf governments have been investing heavily in technology to diversify beyond oil and become global artificial intelligence hubs, deepening ties with US technology firms.

Iranian strikes directly hit two Amazon Web Services facilities in the UAE in March and damaged infrastructure near one of its ⁠facilities in Bahrain. ​The IRGC named US tech companies including Microsoft, Google, Apple and Nvidia as legitimate targets at the ​height of the war in March. Land-based connections can provide alternative routes for internet traffic, and Gulf states and US technology companies are investing in additional infrastructure to improve resilience.

Microsoft plans to invest more than $400 million in subsea ​and terrestrial connectivity across the Middle East by 2030. Editing by Parisa Hafezi and Timothy Heritage Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab Suggested Topics: Middle East X Facebook Linkedin Email Link Purchase Licensing Rights

Read the original article on reuters.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Reuters reports, with clear attribution throughout, that two anonymous Iranian security officials say Tehran has plans to hit Gulf undersea cables if the US and Israel attack Iran again. It sets their threats against an analyst's view that the global impact would be limited. The one weak point is a sentence in which Reuters states, in its own voice, what Iran's leadership is convinced of.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “reflect a conviction in Iran's leadership that a renewed US military ​campaign would have to be met with a stronger response than before”

    Why this matters
    Reuters states in its own voice what Iran's leadership privately believes, with no source attached to the claim.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as an established fact that Iran's leadership as a whole holds this conviction.
    The context
    The only sources in the article are two anonymous security officials and named figures such as Javani and Rezaei, who issued public warnings. None of them is quoted describing a leadership-wide conviction. The sentence is an inference from their remarks and should carry their attribution.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“speaking on condition of anonymity, gave few details”
    • Elsewhere in the article“there will be no more red lines”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “if the United States and Israel attack Iran again”

    Reuters names who would start a renewed war, so the threat reads as conditional on a US and Israeli attack rather than as unprompted Iranian aggression.

  • “the ​global impact of such attacks by Iran could be limited as less than 1% of international bandwidth passes through the Strait of Hormuz”

    Reuters sets an independent, named expert's figure against the officials' threats instead of leaving them to stand alone.

  • “though Tehran ​has made no public statement indicating it plans to target cables there”

    Reuters marks its Red Sea scenario as speculation and does not attribute a plan to Iran that nobody stated.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Reuters

  1. 26 OctSaudi defence pact countries hold talks in Iran as Houthis launch more attacks0.0
  2. 23 OctTrump weighs quick end to Iran war against letting conflict ‘wither’0.0
  3. 22 OctIran's IRGC Navy says seven vessels hit, warns US of wider response0.0
  4. 18 OctIran urges US to accept proposal to reopen Strait of Hormuz0.0
  5. 17 OctIran's Guards say two tankers hit mines in Strait of Hormuz0.0

Everything we scored from Reuters