HuffPost UK, by Kate Nicholson, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

'Have A Little Humility': Andy Burnham Kemi Badenoch Over Brexit Deal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Andy Burnham has told Kemi Badenoch to have “a little humility” over the legacy of the Conservatives ’ Brexit deal. Speaking during prime minister’s questions, the Tory leader criticised Burnham for suggesting the UK could agree to freedom of movement with the EU in his quest to forge closer ties with the trade bloc. But . The prime minister pointed out that in January 2025, Badenoch herself admitted it was a “mistake for the Conservative Party to leave the European Union before we had a plan for growth outside the EU”.

Burnham continued: “She may as well have said it was a mistake to leave the EU without a plan in place to control migration. “Because that is what led to the Boris -wave during the government that she was in moved away from revolving door migration to long-term settlement.” He said that’s why his home secretary Shabana Mahmood is reforming the migration system. “Let’s have a little humility from the benches opposite that left Britain with low growth and migration out of control,” he added.

Badenoch said: “I stand by my words! When we make mistakes we own up to them, they pretend they never do anything wrong.” “That is the difference between him and I,” she said, reminding the PM that he had insisted on respecting the referendum result only earlier this year. But Burnham insisted: “The red lines in the manifesto are clearly in place.” The PM deflected by reminding the Tory leader that she has previously refused to say if she really thinks the EU exit deal improved the UK.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports Burnham saying the manifesto red lines are in place but never says what they are. The Guardian reported that Labour's 2024 manifesto committed to not reinstating freedom of movement. Without that, a reader cannot tell how Burnham's reply bears on Badenoch's freedom of movement charge.

How we know

Badenoch insisted that it did, adding: “He is using those freedoms today, but he doesn’t want to admit that.” She added that the country was “paralysed and miserable” during the Brexit wars, and claimed: “Does the prime minister really think the country wants to reopen that debate?” But Burnham hit back: “Now she is speaking the truth. The country was paralysed by the party opposite. Low growth, insufficient control on migration, that is what this side of the House is dealing with.”

The prime minister told Makerfield constituents – who voted Leave in 2016 – that he would not “re-run” arguments from 2016 when he campaigning to be their MP earlier this year. However, since getting into No.10, Burnham has been accused of reigniting the debate by pointing out the negative impact leaving the EU has had on the UK. On Monday, he said: “I’ve said I’m going to be honest and say, in my lifetime I would like to see that happen, but I am not going to move ahead of the public.

“I am not going to dictate in terms of my own opinions here, you have to make sure that the British public are the bosses.” Burnham added: “I said we wouldn’t rerun the referendum and that’s not what I’m doing. “The British public, the people of Makerfield, will be the bosses here. They will decide what happens in relation to Brexit .” Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed.

Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Read the original article on huffingtonpost.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

HuffPost UK reports a PMQs exchange on Brexit between Andy Burnham and Kemi Badenoch, quoting both leaders at length and with attribution. Its headline and some connecting lines lean towards Burnham with sporting verbs such as "Torches" and "turned the tables", though the body records that Badenoch stood by her words. Nothing in it misleads the reader on the facts of the exchange.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Torches”

    Why this matters
    The headline says in HuffPost's own voice that Burnham "Torches" Badenoch, a verdict on who won the exchange.
    The impression it gives
    A reader expects an article showing Badenoch flattened by Burnham.
    The context
    The body reports a back and forth in which Badenoch answers and does not retreat. She says she stands by her words and accuses Labour of never admitting mistakes. The Daily Express scored the same exchange the other way, which shows the verdict is a matter of opinion and not a fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Burnham turned the tables back on Badenoch”

    Why this matters
    The article tells the reader in its own voice that Burnham reversed the attack, before any of his words are quoted.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Burnham got the better of Badenoch on this point.
    The context
    What follows is Burnham quoting Badenoch's January 2025 remark. Badenoch replies that she owns her mistakes and that the country does not want to reopen the debate. Whether the tables turned is left for the reader to judge.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“When we make mistakes we own up to them”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports Burnham saying the manifesto red lines are in place but never says what they are. The Guardian reported that Labour's 2024 manifesto committed to not reinstating freedom of movement. Without that, a reader cannot tell how Burnham's reply bears on Badenoch's freedom of movement charge.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “in January 2025, Badenoch herself admitted it was a “mistake for the Conservative Party to leave the European Union before we had a plan for growth outside the EU””

    It gives the date and Badenoch's exact words, so the reader can weigh Burnham's point against what she actually said.

  • “reminding the PM that he had insisted on respecting the referendum result only earlier this year”

    It gives Badenoch's counter-attack its substance and does not reduce her side of the exchange to noise.

  • “Burnham has been accused of reigniting the debate by pointing out the negative impact leaving the EU has had on the UK”

    It records the criticism of Burnham's own position and then quotes him answering it, holding the prime minister to his campaign promise.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from HuffPost UK

  1. 28 Oct'So You're A Lettuce Fan?' Piers Morgan Probes Liz Truss Over Her Catastrophic Premiership3.0
  2. 27 Oct'No Respect For The Young': Burnham Slammed Amid Reports Over National Minimum Wage3.0
  3. 27 OctLiz Truss Bewildered By Suggestion She Do Her Own Economic Research3.0
  4. 27 OctAll 5 'Fixes' Andy Burnham Says Will Make Costs Easier Ahead Of 2026's Budget0.0
  5. 27 OctBBC's Nick Robinson Corners Farage Over Reform's Hefty Foreign Donations In Toe-Curling Interview3.0

Everything we scored from HuffPost UK