Haaretz (English), on Iran, 22 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Report: U.S. and Israel have drawn up plans for Iran strikes after midterms

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The United States and Israel have drawn up specific plans for renewed strikes on Iran to be carried out after the American midterm elections, The New York Times reported on Wednesday. The paper, citing U.S. officials and others briefed on the deliberations, all speaking anonymously, said the two militaries are preparing a short, intensive operation. According to the Times, the militaries have stepped up exercises, with planes flying over Iraq to rehearse strike maneuvers.

U.S. officials told the paper that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel this week to discuss new strikes. Related Articles Behind Netanyahu's failed bid for a pre-election Iran war Amos Harel Netanyahu's Iran war plans: A dangerous gamble with Israel's election Haaretz Editorial Report: Trump opposed Netanyahu's proposed early October strikes on Iran Haaretz The likely targets, the report said, are Iran's energy infrastructure, nuclear facilities, and missile and drone arsenal, although some officials said refineries would be spared so as not to push gasoline prices higher.

The Times added that . The paper offered several reasons for the post-election timing. The American force, which includes three aircraft carriers, thousands of Marines, fighter jets and special operations forces, will not be fully in place until early November, when the hours of darkness over Iran, which the U.S. military prefers for attacks, also increase.

The Times noted that President Donald Trump promised earlier this month not to strike before the vote . Officials said there is a small possibility he could order a campaign this month. Nothing has been approved, according to the report. The Times said Trump has vetoed several plans for a return to major combat this year, most recently this month, when U.S. and Israeli defense officials said the operation was nearly ready to launch. A White House official told the paper the administration does not comment on military plans "that may or may not exist."

The Times noted that Israel's Oct. 27 election could complicate matters: if Netanyahu loses, he would be a caretaker prime minister and would find it hard to launch a war.

Read the original article on haaretz.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Haaretz relays a New York Times report on US and Israeli plans for renewed strikes on Iran after the midterms, and attributes nearly every claim to the Times and its anonymous officials. The one weakness is that Iran never speaks: the US planners' belief that three days of strikes could change Iran's position goes unanswered, though other outlets carried Iranian officials rejecting it.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “some U.S. planners are convinced a three-day campaign could do enough economic damage to change Iran's position”

    Why this matters
    Haaretz reports the US planners' belief that a three-day campaign could force Iran to change its position. It sets no Iranian response against it, here or anywhere in the article.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the premise of a short, decisive campaign faces no challenge, and that Iran has said nothing about these plans.
    The context
    Other coverage of the same report calls the calculation disputed. It also reports that Iranian officials warned retaliation could reach data centres, undersea cables and regional oil facilities, and that an adviser to Iran's negotiating team called the 72-hour idea a fantasy. US, Israeli and White House voices fill the article while Iran appears only as a target.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Report:”

    The headline keeps the attribution the body gives. It presents the plans as the New York Times' reporting, not as established fact.

  • “Nothing has been approved, according to the report.”

    The article states plainly that no strike has been authorised, so the reader does not mistake the plans for a decision.

  • “citing U.S. officials and others briefed on the deliberations, all speaking anonymously”

    Haaretz tells the reader exactly who the sources are and that they are unnamed, so the reader can weigh the claims accordingly.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Haaretz (English)

  1. 25 Oct'Missiles from Iran': Facebook, TikTok and Instagram feed us <b>scary news from the past</b>0.0
  2. 25 OctReport: Iranian Officials Say U.S. Diplomats 'Fair Game' as War Tensions Mount - Iran News3.0
  3. 22 OctIran Says It Struck Four Vessels in Gulf, Warns U.S. of Broader Response0.0
  4. 21 OctReport: Trump Opposed Netanyahu's Proposed Early October Strikes on Iran - Iran News3.0
  5. 19 OctIran Threatens to Turn Israel Into 'Scorched Earth' if Energy Sites Are Hit0.0

Everything we scored from Haaretz (English)

See how 59 outlets covered this story