Press TV, on Iran, 13 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findingsSee them marked on presstv.co.uk

Iran has dismissed as “unacceptable” British authorities’ accusations about the Islamic Republic’s involvement in acts of violence and espionage activities in the UK. The Iranian Embassy in the UK released a statement on Thursday, after a British court convicted two Iranian men of spying for Tehran by carrying out surveillance on and a lawyer. The Embassy said that it “categorically rejects the British judicial authorities’ destructive actions in attributing the direction or support of acts of violence in the United Kingdom, as well as any alleged links between the individuals concerned and Iranian institutions, to the Government of Iran, or alleging that they were engaged in espionage activities.”

It also condemned “the instrumental use of security-related allegations and judicial proceedings to advance political agendas,” noting that such practices “create a climate conducive to hostile narratives” against Iran and “foster suspicion” towards Iranians residing in the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, the diplomatic mission urged British authorities to handle sensitive matters professionally and in full accordance with the law. British authorities, it added, should “safeguard the rights of Iranian nationals, including access to legal counsel, the right to pursue legal remedies and appeals, and consular access, in accordance with the United Kingdom’s international obligations."

PRESS RELEASE — Iran (I.R.of) Embassy in UK (@Iran_in_UK) November 12, 2026 The Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in London categorically rejects the British judicial authorities’ destructive actions in attributing the direction or support of acts of violence in the United Kingdom, as well as any alleged links between the individuals… pic.twitter.com/nBrxPpVGfC Following a six-week trial at Woolwich Crown Court in south London, the two Iranian nationals who worked for and the chief executive of UK Lawyers for Israel.

Frank Ferguson, chief prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service’s special crime and counter-terrorism division, that the pair were promised rewards in exchange for sending intelligence, while one of them intended to go beyond surveillance to commit serious violence against his targets. The defendants are expected to be sentenced at London's Central Criminal Court, better known as the Old Bailey, on December 17.

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Press TV reports the Iranian embassy's rejection of a British spying verdict at length. In its own voice it casts doubt on the jury's guilty verdict with "purportedly", and it calls Iran International "Israeli-affiliated" with nothing to support the label. It also describes the people under surveillance as "anti-Iran", treating criticism of Iran's government as hostility to the country.

  1. Casts doubt on a court verdict

    Serious

    “were found guilty of purportedly monitoring targets”

    Why this matters
    Press TV puts "purportedly" in its own voice next to "found guilty". The jury's finding of fact becomes something only alleged.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the monitoring itself is unproven, even after a conviction.
    The context
    A jury convicted the two men after a six-week trial. The article itself says a British court convicted them, and other coverage reports a jury verdict. The verdict is an established legal outcome, though the embassy disputes it and appeals remain open. Press TV can report the embassy's rejection as the embassy's view without hedging the verdict in its own narration.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Following a six-week trial at Woolwich Crown Court, a jury found the two Iranian nationals guilty of monitoring journalists at Iran International and the chief executive of UK Lawyers for Israel. The Iranian embassy rejects the verdict.

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the Israeli-affiliated media network “Iran International””

    Why this matters
    In its own voice Press TV labels the targets' employer "Israeli-affiliated" and attributes the label to no one.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that Iran International is tied to Israel, so the people under surveillance look like agents of a hostile state rather than journalists.
    The context
    The article offers no source or evidence for the label. Other coverage of the same case describes the outlet as a London-based Persian-language news outlet critical of Tehran.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “anti-Iran journalists”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the journalists who were watched "anti-Iran" in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the journalists are hostile to Iran as a country and its people.
    The context
    Other coverage describes the targets as journalists and others critical of the Iranian government. Iran's government and Iran are not the same thing.

    Show it in the article

    “claimed”

    Why this matters
    Press TV introduces the prosecutor's account of a case the jury has already decided with "claimed". The embassy's statements are introduced with "said", "condemned" and "urged".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the prosecution's case is a bare assertion, while the embassy's statements carry more weight.
    The context
    The prosecution's case produced a guilty verdict, which the article itself reports. Attributing the claim about intended violence to the prosecutor is fair. The asymmetric verb adds doubt the article's own facts do not support.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a British court convicted two Iranian men of spying for Tehran”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 12 NovAnalyst: Europeans, like Americans, reject war on Iran0.0
  2. 10 NovIAEA double standards expose Western bias against Iran: Analyst3.0
  3. 8 NovIran prepared to make any new US aggression far more costly: Analyst0.0
  4. 7 NovUS3.0
  5. 7 NovIran’s resolve challenges US-Israeli war plans, reshaping regional dynamics: Analysts3.0

Everything we scored from Press TV