ITV News, on UK Politics, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Home secretary scraps plan to make migrant care workers wait 15 years for settled status

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The home secretary has announced reforms to the immigration system which she says are based on “fairness” and an expectation “that everyone is playing their part”. Shabana Mahmood revealed that foreign care workers who earn at least £25,000 a year will have to wait five years for permanent settlement in the UK. This is a dilution of her original plans to make migrant care workers wait 15 years, after criticism from senior Labour figures including Angela Rayner.

As long as workers arrived in the UK before May 2025 and earn over £25,000, they will be able to apply for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) after five years have passed. In addition, Mahmood told the Commons that refugees who arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel by small boat will have to wait 20 years for settlement. This will rise to 30 years if they do not enter work or study. Mahmood's original proposals from November 2025 would have doubled the qualifying period for settlement for most migrants from five to 10 years, and potentially triple it to 15 for care workers.

The home secretary initially set out the measures to delay settlement amid concerns over in the wake of record post-Brexit net migration figures under the previous Tory government. What could be the new rules for legal migrants and why are they controversial? Andy Burnham: 'Difficult to say' whether legal migration is too high or low In a statement to the Commons, Mahmood accused the Conservatives of losing control of migration with “significant abuse of the care route”.

She said the government will address this by “providing a five-year path to settlement for care workers who lived up to the promise that they made on coming to this country – worked hard and answered our call when we needed them”. Prime Minister Andy Burnham said it was “only fair that those who are making the most valuable contribution to our communities are given the opportunity to settle earlier”. He said in a statement: “People want to see an immigration system based on control, contribution, and which rewards those who play by the rules.

These proposals are based on that principle and recognise the contribution made by overseas workers to our country. Subscribe free to our weekly newsletter for exclusive and original coverage from ITV News. Direct to your inbox every Friday morning. “Following Brexit, the previous government lost control of immigration, with an unprecedented spike in numbers. This Home Secretary is gripping this problem, and she has my full support in doing so."

The PM was not in the Commons for the announcement as he is on route to the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Antigua. Tensions in the Cabinet over the policy surfaced earlier this year when Housing Secretary Angela Rayner publicly attacked the prospect of backdating the plans. Angela Rayner has previously criticised the plans. Credit: PA Rayner, who was not part of the Cabinet at the time, called the proposals to make it more difficult for immigrants to permanently settle in the UK "un-British".

How have the plans been received? Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp described Shabana Mahmood’s announcement as “a U-turn” and claimed it will cost the taxpayer £10 billion. Philp told the Commons: “The Home Secretary now proposes to allow every single care worker and their dependents who arrived prior to May 2025, a number running into hundreds of 1000s, to stay in this country beyond the expiry of their visa – and, in the case of 75% of them, to stay permanently, even though she acknowledges that many of them arrived fraudulently.”

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage branded Mahmood’s decision to water down plans for longer foreign worker settlement routes into the UK “the beginning of the capitulation”. Unite, one of the largest trade unions in the UK, said the home secretary's decision to ensure care workers, NHS workers and teaching assistants don't have retrospective detriment as far as indefinite leave to remain is concerned is a "welcome victory". Unite general secretary Sharon Graham maintained that the announcement was, however, "still short of some necessary detail".

Nick Beales, Head of Campaigning at charity Refugee and Migrant Justice, has criticised the reforms. He told ITV News that the new rules will "harm social cohesion and make life far more difficult for everyone affected, including her own government which will now face unprecedented challenges processing more and more visa renewal applications". "Her party has though made clear that they judge so-called contribution by the size of a person’s salary alone," he added.

Fellow Labour MP Diane Abbott has warned Shabana Mahmood is at risk of creating another Windrush scandal . The Windrush scandal erupted in 2018 when British citizens were wrongly detained, deported or threatened with deportation despite having the right to live in Britain. Abbott told the Commons: “It is right that care workers are exempted from the new arrangements for (indefinite leave to remain). But for the rest of the workforce, the retrospective nature of these new arrangements still seem to be unfair because you can come in legally, you can work legally and then have your residency rights turned upside down.

How can that be fair?" From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below...

Read the original article on itv.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

ITV News reports Shabana Mahmood's revised settlement rules for care workers and small boat arrivals, with reactions from government, opposition, unions, a migrant charity and Labour backbenchers. Contested claims, including the Conservatives' cost figure, are attributed to the people who made them. The one weakness is a loaded word: the reporter's own voice calls lawful migrants nearing settlement a "wave".

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the wave of legal arrivals approaching eligibility”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice ITV News calls people who came lawfully and are nearing settlement a "wave", a water image of something that overwhelms.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes lawful migrants as a flood or threat, not as people moving through a route the state offered them.
    The context
    The article describes people who arrived legally and, in the government's own words, "answered our call when we needed them". Nothing in the facts carries the verdict that "wave" adds. A plain word such as "number" says what is meant.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“answered our call when we needed them”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “claimed it will cost the taxpayer £10 billion”

    ITV News attributes Chris Philp's cost figure to him as a claim. It does not adopt it as fact.

  • “British citizens were wrongly detained, deported or threatened with deportation despite having the right to live in Britain”

    It explains plainly what the Windrush scandal was, so the reader can weigh Diane Abbott's warning.

  • “Nick Beales, Head of Campaigning at charity Refugee and Migrant Justice, has criticised the reforms”

    It gives a voice to a migrant rights charity alongside the politicians, so the people affected are not left only as numbers.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from ITV News

  1. 2 NovCarla Lockhart resigns from the DUP0.0
  2. 2 NovLeicestershire County Council leader quits after leaked comments on redundancies and targeting women0.0
  3. 2 NovMichelle O’Neill insists she will not be deterred after DUP block ministerial engagements0.0
  4. 2 NovFormer transport minister fined for using phone while driving0.0
  5. 2 NovPolice chief admits force 'failed' Henry Nowak in dying moments0.0

Everything we scored from ITV News