BBC News, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

not in my retirement plan, says campaigner

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

'I'm spending my retirement fighting migrant plan' Image source, Joao Santos Image caption, John Bauer is leading the campaign against the government's plans to house migrants at a former airbase By Joao Santos , Local Democracy reporter and George King , Suffolk Published 50 minutes ago A villager leading the campaign against plans to house migrants at a former military base said it was not how he had intended to spend his retirement.

The government has proposed placing up to 931 migrants at RAF Barnham, between Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, and Thetford, Norfolk - with locals set to hold a referendum on leaving the UK in protest. John Bauer, the chairman of Barnham Parish Council, said spearheading the symbolic vote was "energising". A Home Office spokesperson said it was "listening carefully to the concerns". "I retired at the end of last year with the expectation I would be able to do a lot of the things that I had been looking forward to doing for a while," said Bauer, speaking to the Local Democracy Reporting Service .

"Unfortunately, that hasn't happened. It is demanding and exhausting and it is not necessarily what I would have chosen to do in [my retirement]." Image source, Martin Giles/BBC Image caption, In June the Home Office earmarked RAF Barnham as a potential location to house asylum seekers RAF Barnham was one of three Ministry of Defence (MoD) sites identified back in June as a potential location for asylum housing. It came as the government vowed to move away from hotel-based accommodation, but the proposals sparked protests outside the base.

The Home Office had initially sought to house 1,250 asylum seekers at the site, but reduced the number to 931 on Friday after further assessments. The spokesperson added: "The government is working on a fairer distribution of asylum accommodation across the country, with over £1bn saved in costs since the election. "This includes closing all asylum hotels and moving to alternative accommodation, including former military sites." Image source, Joao Santos Image caption, The former military base has witnessed anti-immigration protests in recent weeks Kim Dines, a resident of 13 years, said: "I've been lying awake at night wondering what is going to happen to us because they [the migrants] are so close.

"We're a village of roughly 600 people, ." On Monday, villagers met to discuss the next steps towards holding the referendum. It comes after residents in Piddington, Oxfordshire, voted to withdraw from the UK in opposition to plans to house more than 1,000 migrants at MoD Bicester. Bauer added: "We want everyone to get involved, to actually get out there and vote, we want the strongest possible message to be sent back to those in power.

"The best way of doing that is with a big turnout and a resounding vote to show the strength of feeling within Barnham." Exactly when Barnham's vote will take place, and the specific question residents will be asked remain unknown, but will be agreed in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, the government's plans will continue through the Urgent Crown Development process, which takes the decision-making power away from West Suffolk Council. Image source, Joao Santos Image caption, West Suffolk Council leader Cliff Waterman said RAF Barnham was not suitable Cliff Waterman, the councillor who leads the West Suffolk authority, said: "We naturally respect the village's democratic right to hold a referendum on this.

"We continue to oppose the use of the base for asylum seeker accommodation, and we are making a case to Government which demonstrates why the site is unsuitable." Do you have a story suggestion for Suffolk? Contact us below. Get in touch Your Voice Contact form Contact form Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds , Facebook , external , Instagram , external and X , external . Related topics West Suffolk Council Refugees and asylum seekers Barnham Home Office Immigration Bury St Edmunds Thetford More on this story Village to vote on 'leaving UK' over migrant plans Published 2 days ago RAF Barnham to house fewer migrants in new plans Published 4 days ago Village votes to leave UK over asylum housing plan Published 16 September Reform calls for referendum over migrant housing Published 30 September Related internet links Home Office Local Democracy Reporting Service Barnham Parish Council

Read the original article on bbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

BBC News reports a parish council chairman's campaign against Home Office plans to house up to 931 asylum seekers at RAF Barnham, and gives space to the Home Office and the district council. Its headline calls the site a "migrant camp", a phrase nobody in the article uses, and the residents' fears are quoted while the people to be housed appear only as numbers. These are minor problems; nothing in the piece seriously misleads.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Barnham migrant camp”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the planned accommodation a "migrant camp". No speaker in the article uses that phrase.
    The impression it gives
    A reader pictures a makeshift camp of migrants being set up outside the village.
    The context
    The body describes a government plan to house asylum seekers at a former RAF base. It uses no word like camp.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“potential location for asylum housing”
    • Elsewhere in the article“placing up to 931 migrants at RAF Barnham”

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “we shouldn't be living in fear, we shouldn't be worried about what's going to be on our doorstep [and] who's around us”

    Why this matters
    The BBC quotes a resident who frames the asylum seekers as a source of fear. It sets nothing against her words and gives no voice to the people to be housed or to anyone working with them.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with the sense that the asylum seekers are a threat to the village, with no other view offered.
    The context
    The article gives the asylum seekers no voice. They appear only as figures (1,250, then 931). The Home Office reply addresses costs and hotels, not the residents' fears.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“reduced the number to 931 on Friday”
    • Elsewhere in the article“over £1bn saved in costs since the election”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “A Home Office spokesperson said it was "listening carefully to the concerns".”

    The article puts the government's response near the top rather than burying it.

  • “the government's plans will continue through the Urgent Crown Development process, which takes the decision-making power away from West Suffolk Council”

    It explains the planning process plainly, so the reader knows the referendum is symbolic and who decides.

  • “reduced the number to 931 on Friday after further assessments”

    It gives the original figure, the revised figure and when it changed.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from BBC News

  1. 28 Oct'Honour £120m pledge' Stoke-on-Trent's Portmeirion boss tells PM0.0
  2. 28 OctReform donor Christopher Harborne tied to Guernsey property0.0
  3. 28 OctDocumentary tells story of Gloucester's Muslim community0.0
  4. 28 OctBonfire Night policing will be 'largest operation since Trump visit'0.0
  5. 27 OctBudget 2026: East Grinstead calls for help on fuel costs and high street3.0

Everything we scored from BBC News