i24News, on Iran, 4 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

: Iranian state-owned newspaper threatens US and NATO bases across Europe

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Iranian state newspaper Hamshahri published an aggressive front page on Tuesday threatening attacks against a range of targets throughout Europe. On the front page a man in an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps uniform stares at a map of Europe with 15 targets marked across countries stretching from Portugal to Romania. Notably RAF Fairford appears as a possible target of the IRGC.

The bases mostly comprise major US installations with the remainder comprising major NATO bases. Included on the list is Germany's Ramstein Air Base and Italy's NAS Sigonella, both of which serve as major logistics hubs. Although the map does not explicitly state that these bases will be attacked, it highlights them as potential targets for the IRGC. Hamshahri is published by the municipality of Tehran and has been linked to hardline factions.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article does not say that the Iranian warnings that day were framed as a response in the event of renewed conflict or a threat against Iran. Without it a reader may take the map as a threat of attacks Iran would start.

How we know

The cover was published the night after the US struck Iranian targets on Qeshm Island in the Strait of Hormuz, coinciding with the US midterm elections. What do strikes on Iran before the midterms mean? Suggested articles Trump: Netanyahu and I have agreed that by the end of the year, we are stopping to pay Israel | LIVE BLOG | i24NEWS Israel warns the US that Iran is considering chemical weapons use - report | i24NEWS Iran's Parliament Speaker is rumored to have met with Iraqi militia leaders in recent days | i24NEWS, Alex Schloss

Read the original article on i24news.tv (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

i24News reports an Iranian newspaper's map of US and NATO bases in Europe, but its headline puts a quotation, 'We'll see what happens', in marks when nobody in the article says it. The outlet states as fact that RAF Fairford was the site of a failed IRGC terror attack, when its own earlier report gave this as a UK government accusation about a foiled plot whose suspects were released on bail.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “RAF Fairford was the site of a failed IRGC terror attack in September.”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice i24News states that the IRGC carried out a terror attack at RAF Fairford that failed.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes it is established fact that the IRGC attempted an attack on the base.
    The context
    The outlet's own earlier report gave this as an accusation by the UK Prime Minister, who said a foiled plot was 'almost certainly directed' by the IRGC, and reported that the five people arrested were released on bail. That was a government claim about a plot, not an established IRGC attack.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    In October the UK Prime Minister said a plot at RAF Fairford, foiled in September, was 'almost certainly directed' by the IRGC; the five people arrested were released on bail.

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'We'll see what happens'”

    Why this matters
    The headline opens with the words 'We'll see what happens' in quotation marks, as if someone said them.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the Hamshahri front page or an Iranian official spoke these words as a threat against bases in Europe.
    The context
    No sentence in the body quotes these words or says who said them. The body describes only a map with marked targets and says the map does not explicitly state that the bases will be attacked.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the map does not explicitly state that these bases will be attacked”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article does not say that the Iranian warnings that day were framed as a response in the event of renewed conflict or a threat against Iran. Without it a reader may take the map as a threat of attacks Iran would start.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from i24News

  1. 3 NovIsrael warns the US that Iran is considering chemical weapons use - report3.0
  2. 3 NovIran's Parliament Speaker is rumored to have met with Iraqi militia leaders in recent days0.0
  3. 3 NovIsrael asks Lebanon to prevent Hezbollah from entering the war if the conflict with Iran resumes - report3.0
  4. 3 NovUS strike on Qeshm island described as a ‘defensive act,' in response to Iranian attack on US aircraft | LIVE BLOG3.0
  5. 1 NovNetanyahu, Trump hold private phone call as fears of renewed Iran strikes grow, i24NEWS learns6.0

Everything we scored from i24News