The Independent, on Gaza, 15 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israel says commercial goods will not enter Gaza, a major shutoff for the hungry territory

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in Israel said that commercial goods will no longer enter the Gaza Strip, cutting off a key source of food and shelter supply for the war-torn territory as hungry Palestinians face the approach of winter. COGAT, the Israeli military body that oversees humanitarian affairs in Gaza, announced the suspension of commercial goods in a Wednesday statement.

It was not clear whether they made the decision. COGAT said it was relaying a statement from Gaza merchants, a claim Palestinians refuted. The move stands to immediately reduce Gaza's supplies, because the closed-off territory is completely reliant on whatever goods Israel allows in through border crossings. The suspension also raised fears about affordability, with humanitarian workers saying a combination of aid and a robust commercial market is needed to keep prices under control.

“The humanitarian sector on its own cannot meet the needs of all the people,” said Shaina Low, a spokesperson for the Norwegian Refugee Council, an aid group. “The markets need to be functioning.” The world’s leading authority on food insecurity reported earlier this year that conditions in Gaza had improved since famine was declared in the territory in August 2025, but were still at crisis levels. Most families in the war-battered enclave weren’t getting nearly enough to eat, said the report, adding that “even small disruptions to humanitarian access could rapidly reverse recent gains.”

In announcing the measure, COGAT claimed to be communicating a decision made by local merchants in Gaza who had grown tired of Hamas taxing their trucks and threatening them. Israel has long accused the militant group of levying fees on imports to fund its operations. But the head of Gaza’s private truckers union, Nahed Sheheiber, disputed that, saying Israel had made the decision. “The merchants are not the ones who stopped the shipments," he said.

“The Israeli coordinator is claiming that Gaza’s merchants are responsible, but the truth is that the Israelis are the ones who imposed the restrictions.” Following COGAT's announcement, Shehaiber's union met with Gaza's Ministry of Economy to express concern and say Israel was citing fees levied by the ministry as a pretext to cut off commercial goods. The ministry had been asking merchants to pay 10,000 shekels (about $3,226) per truck entering Gaza, Shehaiber said.

At the meeting, ministry Undersecretary Khaled Al-Raqab told the union that the amount was not a tax, but rather a donation sought by the ministry to help pay civil servants in the strip. It was not clear from the COGAT announcement if aid agencies would be allowed to increase shipments into Gaza to compensate for the loss in commercial goods. The agency claimed that Gaza's population — of roughly 2 million people — required approximately 250 truckloads of goods each day.

That's far below the minimum of 600 trucks a day stipulated by a ceasefire brokered by the U.S. a year ago. The war started when Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people on Oct. 7, 2023, and took 251 hostages. Israel responded with a massive bombardment and a ground invasion that has killed more than 74,000 Palestinians, . That includes over 1,400 Palestinians killed since the ceasefire took effect, the ministry says.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives COGAT's claim that Gaza needs about 250 trucks a day. It never gives COGAT's own statement that the halt cuts total truck entries, aid and commercial, by half to around 300 a day. It also leaves out what diplomats say: far fewer than 600 trucks normally enter. Without these figures a reader cannot judge how large the shutoff is against what Israel is obliged to allow.

How we know

Sporadic attacks have killed five Israeli soldiers in Gaza in the same period. The ministry, part of the Hamas-run government, maintains detailed records and is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts. but says women and children make up around half the dead. ___ Mroue reported from Beirut.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Independent reports Israel's cut-off of commercial goods into Gaza with the claim clearly attributed to COGAT and a Palestinian rebuttal given room. Its closing background gives the Palestinian toll a source, a Hamas label and a caveat, while the Israeli dead are stated as plain fact. It also leaves out COGAT's own figure that total truck entries would fall by half to around 300 a day.

  1. Doubts one side's dead and not the other's

    Minor

    “according to the Gaza Health Ministry”

    Why this matters
    The words "according to the Gaza Health Ministry" attach a source to the Palestinian toll.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Palestinian dead as a figure that rests on one party's word.
    The context
    The Israeli dead in the same passage carry no source at all. S25 states "Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people" as plain fact, so only one side's dead are made to depend on a source.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people”

    Show it in the article

    “It does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its toll”

    Why this matters
    This clause adds a caveat that applies only to the Palestinian count.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is invited to suspect that many of the Palestinian dead were fighters.
    The context
    The Israeli figures get no such caveat. S29 states "Sporadic attacks have killed five Israeli soldiers" as plain fact, and the 1,200 figure is not broken down either. S30 itself says the ministry is "generally reliable", which softens but does not remove the imbalance.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Sporadic attacks have killed five Israeli soldiers”
    • Elsewhere in the article“seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives COGAT's claim that Gaza needs about 250 trucks a day. It never gives COGAT's own statement that the halt cuts total truck entries, aid and commercial, by half to around 300 a day. It also leaves out what diplomats say: far fewer than 600 trucks normally enter. Without these figures a reader cannot judge how large the shutoff is against what Israel is obliged to allow.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “the closed-off territory is completely reliant on whatever goods Israel allows in through border crossings”

    The Independent names Israel as the party that controls what enters Gaza, rather than presenting the shortage as having no author.

  • “the truth is that the Israelis are the ones who imposed the restrictions”

    The article gives the Palestinian truckers' union head direct quotes rebutting COGAT's account, so the Israeli claim is not left unchallenged.

  • “over 1,400 Palestinians killed since the ceasefire took effect”

    It reports that Palestinians are still being killed after the ceasefire, using the word killed rather than writing the deaths out.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 19 OctShort of funds, UN food agency cuts aid to 500,000 Palestinians in Gaza and 200,000 in the West Bank0.0
  2. 17 OctIsrael’s attacks on Palestinian UN agency UNWRA are ‘unprecedented’, says outgoing chief0.0
  3. 16 Oct Israel stops commercial goods from entering Gaza 6.0
  4. 14 OctIsraeli strike in Gaza kills a woman, and other Middle East developments0.0
  5. 11 Oct‘I wish I had stayed with you’: Palestinian mother died of cancer after waiting months to be evacuated3.0

Everything we scored from The Independent

See how 28 outlets covered this story