Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Lebanon, 18 October 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

Under the radar: IDF's surprising move in Lebanon

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

The IDF is currently allowing olive harvesting in agricultural areas located within the security zone in southern Lebanon, including the entry of Syrian laborers employed by Lebanese residents, according to a report by Galei Tzahal. According to the report, the harvest is taking place on agricultural land belonging to villages along the border, from Kfar Shouba in the east to Alma al-Shaab in the west. The activity is being carried out in coordination with IDF forces deployed in the area and under military escort and supervision.

Most of the villages where harvesting is being permitted are Christian villages. However, the list also includes Kfar Shouba, a Sunni Muslim village . During the war, the IDF . Those participating in the harvest include not only residents of the Lebanese villages but also Syrian laborers employed by the landowners. Their entry into the area is also coordinated with the IDF.

Military officials explained that the entry of harvest workers is conditional upon security checks and obtaining the necessary approvals. However, they did not specify how the security screening process is conducted or whether each participant undergoes an individual background check by the IDF Intelligence Directorate or the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet). Another unanswered question is whether the decision to permit harvesting within the security zone was approved by Israel's political leadership.

A further discrepancy emerged between the military's response and the details revealed in the report. The IDF claimed that harvesting was being permitted exclusively in Christian villages, even though Kfar Shouba, which is among the villages where the activity is taking place, is a Sunni Muslim village. : "The IDF is allowing olive harvesting in several Christian villages in southern Lebanon, in accordance with the security assessment.

The entry of participants is subject to the required checks and approvals and is conducted under IDF supervision, with monitoring of their entry into and exit from the area. "The activity is taking place in accordance with the operational assessment, while safeguarding the security of IDF forces and residents of northern Israel. "The IDF is operating in accordance with the ceasefire agreement to ensure the security of residents of northern Israel."

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

In its own voice Arutz Sheva says the IOF 'eliminated several terrorists' in Kfar Shouba, which writes out a killing and labels the dead with no source. It also calls Hezbollah's past activity in the village 'terrorist' in its own voice, and it quotes only the IOF, never the Lebanese landowners or workers whose access to their land is controlled.

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “eliminated”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses 'eliminated' in its own voice for people the IOF killed in Kfar Shouba.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a neutral military result, a problem removed, not people killed.
    The context
    These were killings. The article never uses the word killed anywhere, and it gives no number, no names and no date for the deaths.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “killed”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “several terrorists operating in the village”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the people the IOF killed 'terrorists' in its own voice, citing no source at all.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes it is established that everyone killed in Kfar Shouba was a terrorist.
    The context
    The article gives no source, no names and no account of who these people were. The label rests only on the side that killed them, and the outlet does not even attribute it.

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “from which Hezbollah previously conducted terrorist activities”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states in its own voice that Hezbollah 'conducted terrorist activities' from Kfar Shouba, with no attribution and no detail.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the village was a base for terrorism, which marks it as suspect.
    The context
    This is an unsourced assertion. The article names no incident, no date and no source, and the characterisation is Israel's.

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The IDF Spokesperson's Unit stated”

    Why this matters
    The outlet gives the IOF spokesperson four sentences and military officials more, while the Lebanese landowners and workers are never quoted.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only the occupying army's account of a harvest on Lebanese land.
    The context
    The article quotes no Lebanese resident, landowner or Syrian worker, although they are the people whose access to their land is being controlled.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“residents of the Lebanese villages”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 22 OctIsrael sanctions Lebanese fuel company for supplying fuel to Hezbollah8.2
  2. 21 OctIsraeli robot APC goes rogue, IDF airstrikes nearly spark diplomatic crisis7.3
  3. 21 OctLebanese judge summons Hezbollah officials over seized explosives shipment8.2
  4. 20 OctKatz threatens to expand control in Lebanon if Hezbollah attacks3.0
  5. 20 OctFamily of fallen soldier alleges IDF failures in Lebanon0.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News