Evening Standard, on West Bank, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Miliband ‘deeply concerned’ after MPs say they were detained on way to West Bank

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said he was “deeply concerned” after MPs said they were detained for eight hours by Israeli authorities and . Labour’s Clive Lewis and the SNP’s Lara Bird, along with MSP Kate Nevens of the Scottish Greens, said they were interrogated and denied access to the territory on Monday. Mr Miliband told the Commons on Tuesday that the Government has now raised the issue with the Israeli authorities.

The MPs had travelled as part of a delegation organised by political group Progressive International. According to Progressive International, the group – which also included former MP Sam Tarry and Spanish senator Josu Estarrona Elizondo – was stopped while making the crossing from Jordan and had planned to undertake “a programme of meetings with Palestinian academics, students and civil society organisations” as well as join the olive harvest following what it claims are “mounting attacks” against farmers in the territory.

In the Commons, Labour MP Dr Simon Opher (Stroud) asked if the Foreign Secretary would join him in condemning the MPs being blocked from entering the territory. Mr Miliband responded: “We are obviously deeply concerned about the denial of entry to the West Bank for two Members of Parliament, and I believe one member of the Scottish Parliament as well. “We have raised this issue with the Israeli authorities and been in touch with the MPs to offer assistance.

“More broadly, it’s very, very important that members of this House, as they go about their business – not just in the UK but internationally – have free access so that they can actually do their duties.” In a post on X, Norwich South MP Mr Lewis said: “For more than eight hours, we were held, interrogated and made to feel as though we had done something wrong simply by attempting to enter. “The simple truth is we had done nothing wrong.

“We went to show our support for the Palestinian people and highlight the terrible injustice and violence being perpetrated against them. “We want to ensure that people back home do not look away from the reality of what is happening. “Ultimately, we went to show solidarity. But we left with an even greater determination to speak out. “We will not be silenced, and we will not look away. None of us should.” Ms Bird – who was elected earlier this year to the Arbroath and Broughty Ferry seat on Scotland’s east coast – posted: “I came to stand alongside Palestinians being attacked for harvesting olives on their own land.

Instead, we were turned away, with no reason given. “More than ever, Palestinians are being subject to terror and violence by the IDF and illegal settlers. “Increased blockades, demolitions and unthinkable violence have become the norm for Palestinians in the West Bank. “It is more important now than ever that we bear witness and show our solidarity.” Reports suggest the two MPs .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article leaves out that the Israeli military had announced the closure of all West Bank land crossings for Israel's national elections. Without it, a reader is left with Lara Bird's "no reason given" and the unsourced suggestion that the MPs should have sought permission. A reader does not learn that the crossing was shut to everyone.

How we know

Green MSP Ms Nevens added: “We had travelled to the West Bank to stand in solidarity with Palestinians facing escalating violence, and to join the olive harvesters. “We went to bear witness, to listen to Palestinian communities and to help shine a light on the abuses taking place. “The Israeli forces didn’t want us to see the demolished homes, or the settlers inflicting so much misery or the day to day indignities that are so central to the occupation.”

The Foreign Office and Israeli embassy have been contacted for comment.

Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Evening Standard reports the detention and refusal of two MPs and an MSP at the Jordan crossing, with fair attribution and the politicians' own words. In its own voice it never says the West Bank is occupied, and it treats Israel's authority over who enters as normal. It adds an unsourced line suggesting the MPs could have sought Israeli permission, while leaving out that Israel had closed all West Bank land crossings that day.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “denied entry to the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The outlet writes "denied entry to the West Bank" by "Israeli authorities" and elsewhere calls it only "the territory". It never says in its own voice that the West Bank is occupied.
    The impression it gives
    A reader may believe Israel controls entry to the West Bank as its own sovereign border, so a refusal is a routine border decision.
    The context
    Israel controls these crossings as an occupying power. The International Court of Justice ruled the occupation unlawful in July 2024. The only mention of occupation in the article comes inside a quote from Kate Nevens.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

    “could have sought permission to access the West Bank from the Israeli government”

    Why this matters
    The outlet presents seeking "permission" from "the Israeli government" as the proper route into the West Bank.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the Israeli government is the lawful gatekeeper of the West Bank, and that the MPs skipped a legitimate step.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful. Israeli control over who visits Palestinians there is part of that occupation, not a settled sovereign right. The article gives the reader none of this.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article leaves out that the Israeli military had announced the closure of all West Bank land crossings for Israel's national elections. Without it, a reader is left with Lara Bird's "no reason given" and the unsourced suggestion that the MPs should have sought permission. A reader does not learn that the crossing was shut to everyone.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Evening Standard

Everything we scored from Evening Standard