IDF kills Hamas commander involved in holding Noa Argamani, 11 other hostages

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The IDF killed a Hamas squad commander who was involved in holding multiple hostages during their captivity in Gaza, including former hostages Noa Argamani, Emily Hand and Ohad Ben Ami, the military and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) said in a joint statement on Friday.Ihab Jamil Abu Taqiya, a squad commander in Hamas's military wing, was killed in an Israeli airstrike in the Nuseirat area on Thursday. The IDF said Abu Taqiya had been involved in holding numerous hostages at the beginning of the war, naming 12 individuals who were subsequently released or whose bodies were returned to Israel.Another Hamas terrorist, Ibrahim Gihad Muhammad Abu Oshaiba, a platoon commander in the group's military wing, was also killed in the strike, according to the military.

The IDF said the two terrorists had advanced attacks against Israeli troops and civilians throughout the war, particularly in recent weeks, and worked to restore Hamas's military capabilities in what it described as systematic violations of the ceasefire.

The military said the strike was carried out to remove the threat they posed, and emphasized that measures were taken to reduce harm to civilians before the strike.IDF strikes Hamas weapons storage facilities in GazaIn a separate joint announcement, the IDF and Shin Bet said they had dismantled two weapons storage facilities used by Hamas's military wing in strikes carried out Thursday night in the Al-Bureij area and Gaza City.The facilities contained dozens of weapons and other military equipment, including RPG launchers, explosive devices, rockets, Kalashnikov rifles, grenades and ammunition magazines, according to the military.

The IDF said advance warnings had been issued to civilians ahead of the strikes and that precision munitions and aerial surveillance had been used to reduce the risk of civilian casualties.Four Hamas terrorists killed in strikes in southern GazaThe military and Shin Bet also announced that four Hamas terrorists had been killed in two separate strikes in the southern Gaza Strip earlier this week.In a strike in the Khan Yunis area on Wednesday, the IDF killed Muhammad Alian Biyuk, whom it identified as a Nukhba operative in Hamas's military wing.In a separate strike in the Rafah area on the same day, the military killed three additional Hamas terrorists: commander Al-Hamam Jaber Al-Sayed Abu Labda, Mahmoud Abu Naama and Muhammad Hamad Shreiki Sultan.The IDF said the terrorists had advanced attacks against Israeli forces and civilians and had worked to restore Hamas's capabilities, in violation of the ceasefire.

It said measures had been taken to reduce the risk to civilians during the strikes, including the use of precision munitions and aerial surveillance.

The military added that IDF troops under Southern Command remained deployed in Gaza in accordance with the ceasefire agreement and would continue operating to remove immediate threats.

Read the original article on jpost.com

What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post reports that Israeli occupation forces killed six men in Gaza strikes during the ceasefire. In its own voice it labels them "Hamas terrorists" when its only source is the army and Shin Bet. Its headline states the army's claim about the hostages as plain fact, though the body attributes it.

Labels people on one side's word
Severe
“Another Hamas terrorist”
Why this matters
The Jerusalem Post calls Ibrahim Gihad Muhammad Abu Oshaiba, a man killed in an Israeli airstrike, "Another Hamas terrorist" in its own voice, before it gives any attribution.
The impression it gives
A reader takes it as an established fact, checked by the paper, that the dead man was a terrorist.
The context
The only basis the article gives for who he was and what he did is the joint statement of the army and Shin Bet. The paper offers no independent source, and the label is the military's word repeated as the paper's own.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“the military and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) said in a joint statement”
Show it in the article
“the military killed three additional Hamas terrorists”
Why this matters
The paper describes three men killed in a Rafah strike as "three additional Hamas terrorists" in its own sentence, with no attribution attached to the label.
The impression it gives
A reader believes it is confirmed that Mahmoud Abu Naama and Muhammad Hamad Shreiki Sultan, named with no rank or role, were terrorists.
The context
Nothing in the article but the army's announcement supports the label. The paper repeats it without saying it is the military's claim and unverified.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“the military and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) said in a joint statement”
Show it in the article
Headline goes beyond the article
Serious
“IDF kills Hamas commander involved in holding Noa Argamani, 11 other hostages”
Why this matters
The headline states as fact that the man killed was a Hamas commander who held Noa Argamani and 11 other hostages, with no attribution.
The impression it gives
A reader believes the dead man's role in holding these hostages is established fact.
The context
The body attributes both his rank and his role in holding hostages to a joint statement by the army and Shin Bet. The headline drops the attribution the body gives.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“the military and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) said in a joint statement on Friday”
- Elsewhere in the article“The IDF said Abu Taqiya had been involved in holding numerous hostages”
Show it in the article
Written straight
Israeli strike kills man the army says was a Hamas commander who held Noa Argamani and 11 other hostages.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

IDF kills Hamas commander involved in holding Noa Argamani, 11 other hostages

Labels people on one side's word

Headline goes beyond the article

More from The Jerusalem Post