The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

'You'll know soon enough': Trump leaves door open to devastating new Iran strikes

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

US President Donald Trump, when asked about his plans regarding the resumption of military action in Iran on Thursday, said that the country was largely destroyed and that it would take more than two decades to rebuild."I would rather not destroy the rest of the country if possible," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office following a meeting with his national security advisers, "but maybe I'll have to. You'll know soon enough."In October, the New York Times reported that the American and Israeli militaries have drawn up detailed plans for renewed strikes on Iran following the US midterm elections on November 3, citing officials familiar with the matter.Trump raises doubts over renewed attacks on IranOn Monday, one day before the midterm elections, Trump raised doubts about whether he would follow through on those plans.

Asked by reporters if he was considering striking Iran after the midterms, Trump replied, "No."“We are prepared and ready to act. At least if we need to finish the job with Iran, we are definitely ready for that,” the president said of US military readiness.On Tuesday, Trump said that the United States has no immediate plan to renew strikes against Iran during an interview with the Financial Times on Tuesday.The statement followed US strikes on Iran's Qeshm Island after to have downed an American drone, a US official confirmed to The Jerusalem Post on Monday.On ongoing indirect negotiations with Tehran, Trump said on Tuesday, “We seem to be getting everything we want.”Trump says US ready for further Iran strikes, admits war hurt GOP in midtermsOn Wednesday night, Trump admitted that the war in Iran had hurt the Republican Party in the congressional midterm elections, but made clear that, in hindsight, he would still have made the decision to go to war.“I think that's largely true, because the war caused a certain short-term rise in fuel prices,” he said, when asked whether the war had hurt the Republicans.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article reports Trump saying the US is "getting everything we want" in indirect talks, but never says that Iran had sent a nuclear proposal through Qatar or that mediators' proposals were under consideration. Without it a reader sees the talks only as Trump describes them.

How we know

“But at the same time, if I had to make the decision again, I would have to do it again, because in the long run it's the only solution. Iran cannot be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.”Addressing reports that US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth could be replaced following the election defeat, Trump said he is not considering replacing him. “He's doing an extraordinary job,” he said.Trump also responded to remarks by US Vice President JD Vance, who blamed the war for the Republicans' defeat.

“Vance is largely right, and at the same time, if I'm required to fight Iran again, I'll do it to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon,” he said.“Yes. I mean, well, there was no choice,” Trump replied when asked whether this was a war he chose to wage. “I thought oil prices would go up much more, and I made the decision based on that assumption.”“Iran cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, otherwise everything you see here might one day no longer exist,” he said.Reuters, Goldie Katz, Aaron Glick, and Asher Smith contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post calls Iran's government "the regime" in its own narration, with no attribution. It reports Trump saying the US is getting everything it wants in indirect talks, but never says Iran had sent a nuclear proposal through Qatar, so a reader sees the talks only as Trump describes them.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the regime claimed”

    Why this matters
    The Jerusalem Post calls Iran's government "the regime" in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a verdict on Iran's government as plain description, set against a neutral "US official" in the same sentence.
    The context
    "Regime" is a loaded term that belongs in quotation marks from whoever uses it. The outlet uses the same kind of label in its own voice in earlier reporting. "Iran's government" or "Iranian officials" would report the drone claim without the verdict.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports Trump saying the US is "getting everything we want" in indirect talks, but never says that Iran had sent a nuclear proposal through Qatar or that mediators' proposals were under consideration. Without it a reader sees the talks only as Trump describes them.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “The statement followed US strikes on Iran's Qeshm Island”

    The outlet names the US as the actor of the strikes in the active sense rather than hiding who carried them out.

  • “the New York Times reported that the American and Israeli militaries have drawn up detailed plans for renewed strikes on Iran”

    The outlet attributes the report of strike plans to its source and names both militaries involved.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 5 NovPahlavi to 'Post' ahead of Freedom Prize: 'Europe's leaders understand Iran's regime must go'3.0
  2. 5 Nov‘Nobody considered this a European problem’: Is Europe ready to stand up to Iranian threats?3.0
  3. 5 NovUS sanctions three for aiding Iran's air defenses amid reports of Moscow-Tehran arms deal6.0
  4. 5 NovSouth Korea to expand anti-piracy unit operations closer to Strait of Hormuz3.0
  5. 4 NovIran steps up attacks on Kurdish opposition groups in northern Iraq6.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post