Middle East Eye, on Iran, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran warns of ‘unimaginable’ response to as tensions rise over Hormuz

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iran has issued a warning to the United States that any new act of militarism would lead to an "unimaginable" response, with parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf saying that Iran would not back down if attacked. Addressing parliament, Qalibaf said the Iranian government would not be intimidated by US military threats or pressure and would defend . “Americans think that with a few levers of media pressure or military threats, they can make this great nation surrender to them,” he said, according to a report by Iran’s Tasnim news agency.

“Unaware that today's Iran is not the Iran of the Pahlavi era of humiliation, but rather an impregnable fortress of self-confidence, defensive strength and iron will,” he added. Qalibaf said Iran was prepared to respond forcefully to any violation of its territory and insisted that threats of a wider war would not compel the country to abandon its interests. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters “Until the Americans change their behaviour, stop being coercive and greedy, and compensate their violated obligations in an objective, concrete and real way on the ground, no claim for the Islamic Republic of Iran will have an iota of credibility,” Qalibaf said.

Qalibaf said Washington had placed itself in a tough spot due to its decisions to attack Iran. The warning came a day after US President Donald Trump said Washington could strike Iran as soon as Sunday or reach a “big, beautiful” agreement with Tehran, as tensions rise over the future of the Strait of Hormuz. On Sunday, Iran’s army said that its air defence systems had shot down a US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas, a port city in southern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz.

Gulf exports more oil than it did before Iran war despite surge in Hormuz attacks Read More » Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the war with the US and Israel means the security situation in the region has completely changed and that the management of the strait would not return to its previous state. “The current war has changed everything. We must acknowledge that new realities have emerged,” Araghchi said in remarks reported by Anadolu Agency, citing Iran’s Press TV.

“The shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz will no longer be the same as before, nor will the strait be managed as it was in the past,” he added. Araghchi said Tehran would welcome security arrangements developed by countries in the region rather than imposed by outside powers. The waterway, between Iran and Oman, is one of the most important in the world. It connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Its security is crucial to international energy shipments.

Iran and the US remain at odds over how the strait should be managed following the conflict. Tehran has asserted its authority over passage through the waterway, while Washington has called for unrestricted navigation. However, although there was an interim deal signed between the two nations in June to solve the conflict, diplomatic negotiations have since stalled amid renewed tensions. Copyright © 2014 - 2026 . Middle East Eye. All rights reserved.

Only England and Wales jurisdiction apply in all legal matters. Middle East Eye ISSN 2634-2456

Read the original article on middleeasteye.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Middle East Eye reports Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf's warning to the US and Abbas Araghchi's remarks on the Strait of Hormuz. It attributes both men's words to named sources throughout. Two small word choices tilt it: the headline uses 'US aggression' in the outlet's own voice where the body speaks of a possible attack, and the article qualifies Iran's territorial integrity as only 'what it considers' it to be.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “US aggression”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls a possible future US strike 'US aggression' in the outlet's own voice, outside the quotation marks around 'unimaginable'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes 'aggression' as the outlet's own description of the US action Iran is warning about.
    The context
    The body puts the warning in conditional, attributed terms: Qalibaf spoke of 'any new act of militarism' and said Iran would not back down 'if attacked'. The verdict word belongs to Qalibaf's framing, and the headline does not mark it as his.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“any new act of militarism would lead to an "unimaginable" response”

    Show it in the article

  2. Qualifies Iran's own territory as its view

    Minor

    “what it considers the country’s territorial integrity”

    Why this matters
    The words 'what it considers' turn Iran's territorial integrity into a matter of the Iranian government's opinion.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking Iran's territory, as Qalibaf spoke of it, is disputed or merely claimed.
    The context
    Qalibaf spoke of any violation of Iran's own territorial integrity, which no one in the article disputes. Contested passage through the strait is a separate matter, and the article reports it separately in S19.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “according to a report by Iran’s Tasnim news agency”

    The article names the source of Qalibaf's quoted words instead of leaving them unsourced.

  • “Iran’s army said that its air defence systems had shot down a US LUCAS drone”

    The drone claim is reported as the Iranian army's statement and names the location, giving it the same attribution a US military claim would need.

  • “the war with the US and Israel”

    The article names both parties to the war on Iran rather than calling it an Iranian war or a faceless conflict.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Middle East Eye

  1. 27 OctOman calls for Gulf, Iraq and Iran to unite under one security pact3.0
  2. 26 OctMecca alliance visits Tehran in push to end Israeli-US war and build regional security3.0
  3. 23 Oct'Escalation is coming': Middle East on edge as new Israeli-US attack on Iran looms0.0
  4. 19 OctUAE government-linked jet lands in Tehran as regional tensions rise0.0
  5. 16 OctUS weighs lifting sanctions on Iran's 'shadow fleet' to address surging costs3.0

Everything we scored from Middle East Eye