Evening Standard, on Climate, 5 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

65% of Labour voters want Government to approve Rosebank oil field – survey

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Almost two-thirds of Labour supporters want to see UK ministers approve the controversial Rosebank oil and gas field, a survey suggests. 65% of those who backed Labour in the 2024 general election wanted to see the project – which is the largest undeveloped oil field in UK waters – get the green light. Despite Labour’s manifesto in 2024 under Sir Keir Starmer pledging no new oil and gas licences would be granted, less than a fifth (17%) of the party’s voters said Rosebank – which lies to the north-west of Shetland – should be rejected.

With the UK Government , now under Andy Burnham , having already approved the Jackdaw gas field off the coast of Aberdeen, the Opinium research found 68% of Labour supporters agreed this was the right decision. Environmental campaigners are urging ministers to reject drilling at Rosebank,. (Andrew Milligan/PA) Almost three-quarters (72%) of those who voted for the party in 2024 agreed oil and gas are “essential for the foreseeable future”.

The polling – which questioned 2,050 adults across the UK – found that overall, 55% of people were in favour of increasing the country’s domestic oil and gas production, with 63% saying Rosebank should be given the go-ahead. and start working through the pipeline of North Sea projects that are awaiting approval”. He added: “The public are clearly in agreement with the new Prime Minister’s ‘pragmatic’ policy on the North Sea, which will once again be tested as the final decision on Rosebank is made in the coming months.

“Investing in North Sea energy strengthens Britain’s economy, supports UK supply chains and industrial communities, and builds our energy resilience.” PA Graphics His comments came after the UK Government introduced its Energy Independence Bill, which includes a commitment to issue no new oil and gas licences to explore new fields in the North Sea. Rosebank had however previously been granted a licence by the Conservative government – though it was later ruled this was unlawful, leading to the project having to be considered again.

Speaking about the new legislation, Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh said: “Through this Bill, we will build a clean energy future which people feel in their pockets, households and communities, ensuring support reaches those who need it most.” On the survey findings, Conservative shadow energy secretary and MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine Andrew Bowie said: “The message from the public could not be louder or clearer – support the extraction of North Sea oil and gas before it’s too late.

“This poll shows that Labour are blatantly ignoring the needs of the public, and even their own voters. “These findings make yesterday’s move by Labour to ban any new exploration for oil and gas in the North Sea even more ludicrous, highlighting how disconnected they are from what people in the real world think. “The reality is Andy Burnham is scared to back oil and gas because he is too weak to stand up against net zero zealots, both inside and outside his party.

Shadow energy security Andrew Bowie claimed the Prime Minister is ‘too weak to stand up against net zero zealots’ (PA) PA Wire “If Labour continue to wage war on oil and gas, then it’s inevitable businesses will cut jobs and head for the exit, never to return. “That is why Andy Burnham must stop his reckless playground politics, listen to the public, and finally approve Rosebank to ensure North Sea drilling continues for years to come.”

But Tessa Khan, executive director of the campaign group Uplift, said: “The oil industry has long sought to position Rosebank as meeting the needs of the UK, yet the overwhelming majority of its oil will be exported overseas. “Not only will it make no meaningful difference to UK energy security, it will do nothing to lower our energy bills, which is what is keeping people awake at night. “What Rosebank will do is make huge profits for its developers – companies that are already raking in billions, while households across the UK worry about how to stay warm this winter, thanks to soaring oil and gas prices.

The only way to lower bills long term is to get off the fossil fuel rollercoaster. “At the same time, around eight in 10 people are concerned about climate change. The vast climate pollution from Rosebank will make the heatwaves, droughts and floods we’re now seeing worse. “Scientists are clear we cannot have any more oil and gas if we want a liveable climate – Rosebank is incompatible with safe climate thresholds. It is the test of this Labour Government’s credibility on climate.”

Read the original article on standard.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Standard reports an Opinium poll showing most Labour voters back approval of the Rosebank oil field, and it carries both industry and campaigner voices. It never tells readers that Offshore Energies UK, which commissioned the poll and whose chief executive frames the results, is the trade body for North Sea oil and gas companies. A reader is left to take a poll paid for by the industry that wants Rosebank approved, and its spokesman's reading of it, as neutral.

  1. Hides who the source is

    Serious

    “Polling for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) found”

    Why this matters
    The words "Polling for Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)" name the poll's sponsor but say nothing about what the organisation is. The article never describes OEUK anywhere.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the poll as coming from a neutral energy organisation with no stake in whether Rosebank goes ahead.
    The context
    Offshore Energies UK is the trade association for North Sea oil and gas companies and runs the Back the North Sea campaign. It commissioned a poll on a field its members want approved, and the article never tells the reader that.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade”.

    Show it in the article

    “OEUK chief executive David Whitehouse said the survey results “offer Government an opportunity to align with public opinion”

    Why this matters
    The phrase "OEUK chief executive David Whitehouse" brings in the poll sponsor's head to interpret the results and urge approvals. Again there is no word on whose interests he speaks for.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears Mr Whitehouse as a neutral commentator on public opinion, not as the spokesman for the companies whose projects are in the "pipeline" he wants approved.
    The context
    Mr Whitehouse leads the oil and gas industry's trade body. His call to start "working through the pipeline of North Sea projects" is the industry lobbying for its own projects, and the article leaves that unsaid.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade” and “lobby”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Polling commissioned by Offshore Energies UK, the trade body for North Sea oil and gas companies, found 65% of those who backed Labour in 2024 wanted Rosebank approved.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Evening Standard

  1. 5 NovSwinney: Scottish Government does not back ban on new oil and gas3.0
  2. 4 NovWilliam calls threat of wildfires ‘terrifying’ on visit to see Welsh fire crews6.0
  3. 4 NovMinisters urged to set target to almost treble Scotland’s onshore wind power0.0
  4. 3 NovKellogg’s removes rice from Rice Krispies due to ‘changing weather conditions’3.0
  5. 2 NovRecord domestic subsidence claims received after summer heatwaves – insurers3.0

Everything we scored from Evening Standard