Common Dreams, on Climate, 30 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

As Big Oil Reports Billions in Q3 Profits, Climate Groups Say Tax Them to 'Protect Communities'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

As US fossil fuel giants on Friday followed European companies in reporting their soaring profits for the third quarter of this year, and as drives up prices worldwide, climate campaigners renewed calls to tax the corporations wrecking the planet.Chevron and ExxonMobil respectively reported adjusted earnings of $10.4 billion and $17.5 billion for July-September, a day after UK-based Shell and the French firm TotalEnergies said their adjusted earnings were $10.8 billion and $9.1 billion—announcements that all came after Trump, who is personally invested in the industry, bragged that "we're making a freaking fortune."Collectively, major firms in the United States have "earned more than $130 billion in profit as people pay much higher prices for gasoline, diesel, and other fuel," The New York Times reported Friday, after analyzing "the performance of more than 50 large US oil and gas companies, most of them producers or refiners, in the six months from April through September."Not only are fossil-fuel companies killing people with pollution and helping to destroy the conditions for life on this planet, they absolutely flourish when there’s war.Has there ever been a more demonic industry?[image or embed]— Dr. Genevieve Guenther (she/they) (@doctorvive.bsky.social) October 30, 2026 at 7:17 AMMeanwhile, as greenhouse gases in the atmosphere climb to unprecedented highs ahead of the next United Nations climate summit, COP31, the Climate Solutions Lab at Brown University estimates US residents have paid at least $81.5 billion more for gasoline and over $66 billion for diesel, or a total of $147.8 billion, since Trump began bombing Iran in February.

"Trump called on polluters to finance his campaign as a quid pro quo in exchange for his administration doing all it can to tear down protections for people and the environment," Sierra Club's director of beyond fossil fuels policy, Mahyar Sorour, noted Thursday. "That $1 billion campaign investment is bringing big returns for the biggest oil and gas companies that heeded the call and are now expected to double their Q3 earnings over last year as energy prices skyrocket due to Trump's war in Iran.""It's not just Big Oil that is profiting off of Trump's action: The president himself is lining his own pockets and bragging about it on stage while Americans struggle to make ends meet," Sorour stressed.

"Trump does not care about people's health or about building a secure, clean energy future. He cares about himself and his friends in Big Oil getting richer. We need to rein in Big Oil and Gas profiteering and enact a windfall profits tax."[twitter_embed https://twitter.com/jamieclimate/statuses/2116150890889453608 text="" name="" screen_name="jamieclimate" id="2116150890889453608" created_ts="" iframe_id="twitter-embed-2116150890889453608" expand=1 embed_desktop_width=550 embed_desktop_height=834 embed_mobile_width=375 embed_mobile_height=744] Rebecca Newsom, global political lead at Greenpeace International, pointed out Friday that "every time a crisis pushes up the prices, the same oil and gas giants are there to cash in.

This is fossilflation. The rest of us pay, at the pump, at the checkout, and again through the climate disasters driven by the fuels the industry intends to extract down to the last barrel." "This is where decades of fossil fuel dependence have led us, and governments that keep letting these corporations off the hook are leaving households to foot the bill," she continued. "It doesn't have to be this way. If governments permanently increase taxes on oil and gas profits and clamp down on corporate profit shifting, hundreds of billions of dollars could be raised, while supercharging a shift in investment towards cleaner, more secure renewable energy."

According to Newsom, "That revenue should protect communities from price shocks and extreme weather, and accelerate a just transition away from fossil fuels."[twitter_embed https://twitter.com/SenWhitehouse/statuses/2116179928698011845 text="" name="" screen_name="SenWhitehouse" id="2116179928698011845" created_ts="" iframe_id="twitter-embed-2116179928698011845" expand=1 embed_desktop_width=550 embed_desktop_height=689 embed_mobile_width=375 embed_mobile_height=623] Candice Fortin, US campaigns manager at the group 350.org, highlighted that the fossil fuel industry's latest profit reports came just days before Americans head to the polls next Tuesday for elections that will determine control of Congress for the rest of Trump's second term.

"As we head into the midterms, energy affordability is on everyone's minds," she said. "Families and small businesses want reliable electricity they can afford, and communities want a say in how their land, water, and energy resources are used. Yet as people struggle with energy bills and the impacts of extreme weather, the biggest oil companies are forecast to make billions.""We need an energy system that puts people first," Fortin argued.

"That means protecting households from losing access to essential electricity during extreme heat and cold, expanding affordable solar and wind power, and ensuring that new sources of electricity demand, including data centers, do not drive up bills or place additional pressure on communities. It also means making sure oil and gas companies pay their fair share towards the costs of the crisis, rather than leaving the public to pick up the bill."

Read the original article on commondreams.org (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Common Dreams reports third-quarter oil profits alongside climate groups' calls for a windfall tax. It attributes its profit figures and price estimates to named sources and names each campaigner's organisation. One word in its own voice, "illegal", gives a legal verdict on the Iran war that nothing in the article supports.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “President Donald Trump's illegal Iran War”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, Common Dreams calls the Iran war "illegal" without quoting anyone, citing a ruling or giving a reason.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the war has been found unlawful.
    The context
    Nothing in the article gives a legal finding or a source for that verdict. The article is about oil profits and tax demands, and the legal status of the war is asserted rather than reported.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “ruling”.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the Climate Solutions Lab at Brown University estimates US residents have paid at least $81.5 billion more for gasoline”

    The article presents the cost figure as a named institution's estimate rather than as settled fact.

  • “The New York Times reported Friday, after analyzing”

    The article attributes the $130 billion profit figure to the Times and says how the paper arrived at it.

  • “the climate disasters driven by the fuels the industry intends to extract”

    The article carries the link between fossil fuels and climate disasters, consistent with the documented science.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Common Dreams

  1. 30 OctUS oil giants Chevron and ExxonMobil forecast billions in profits as communities struggle with energy costs0.0
  2. 28 OctAhead of COP31, 146 Scientists Urge UN to Declare Climate Change a Global Health Emergency6.0
  3. 27 Oct'Another Year, Another New Record': UN Highlights Rising Greenhouse Gas Levels Ahead of COP310.0
  4. 27 Oct'A Crime of Extreme Inequality': Richest 0.1% Generate More Carbon Pollution Than Half of Humanity3.0
  5. 26 Oct‘Permitting Reform’ Is a Giveaway to Data Centers and Fossil Fuels0.0

Everything we scored from Common Dreams