Inside the town polarised by ‘toxic opinions’ over asylum accommodation plans
Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding
We do not republish articles from The i Paper. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
The i Paper runs a vox pop from Crawley that gives space both to residents angry about asylum accommodation and to residents who call the debate toxic. Its opening line says 'some' residents back a symbolic referendum on leaving the UK, but the article quotes only one resident, Angela, saying so.
Turns one voice into several
Minor
“with some saying the town “probably needs” to follow in the footsteps of Piddington , Oxfordshire, and hold a symbolic referendum on leaving the UK over the issue”
Why this matters
The opening sentence says 'some' residents back a Piddington-style secession referendum.
The impression it gives
Several Crawley residents are calling for a vote to leave the UK.
The context
Only one resident in the article, Angela, says this. The other residents quoted on the referendum either call it a waste of time or do not mention it.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“be a symbolic referendum to leave the UK in Crawley”
Elsewhere in the article“he thought the idea was “a waste of time.””
What it gets right
“some residents have argued that opinions about asylum accommodation have become “toxic””
It gives real space to residents who push back against the hostility, rather than presenting the town as uniformly opposed.
“Carpenter, whose parents are Jamaican, said he has seen demographics change significantly since first moving to Crawley”
It includes a resident from a migrant family who speaks to the town's long history of migration, which widens who counts as a local in the piece.