City AM, on Climate, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

British Airways owner warns green charges will ‘kill’ aviation industry and hike fares

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

The chief executive of British Airways’ parent company has said planned environmental charges on airlines would “kill” the European aviation industry and push up fares. Luis Gallego, the chief executive of International Airlines Group (IAG), has warned the proposed green charges – which are more burdensome for UK carriers – would hike prices for passengers and cause damage to the aviation industry.

Currently, British airlines’ fuel mix must be 3.7 per cent SAF. After rising next year, this amount is expected to soar to 10 per cent by the end of the decade. Gallego warned that oil companies which produce SAF are not producing enough for them to use in order to meet the mandated green targets. Gallego told the Financial Times: “We have mandates for things that do not exist.” “All the European airlines will have a major cost disadvantage to global competitors and this is going to have consequences,” Gallego said.

IAG’s chief executive added the aviation industry should have “a level playing field, otherwise we’re going to kill European aviation, but we’re not going to save the planet.” This follows UK ministers holding a consultation on the green fuel plans where one official said “a common sense approach” to aviation fuel will enable carriers to “keep costs down and make it cheaper for families to go on holiday.” In the consultation, ministers are considering rules that would mean UK airlines would be required to buy sustainable fuel made from non-food waste or by electricity, known as second or third-generation SAF, which is more expensive than the standard SAF.

Soaring fuel costs hit IAG profit IAG has taken a hit to its profit due to soaring fuel costs, which industry bosses have warned may lead to some airlines collapsing next year. The London-listed firm, which also owns airlines Vueling and Aer Lingus alongside British Airways , saw its pre-tax profit dip 16 per cent to €3bn in the nine months to the end of September. The group said this hit to profit was due to the “significant increase in jet fuel prices from March onwards,” which was caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz following the outbreak of war in the Middle East.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

City AM reports IAG chief executive Luis Gallego's warning that green fuel charges will 'kill' European aviation and raise fares, and attributes that warning to him. The article explains the sustainable aviation fuel mandate only as a rising cost and never says it is meant to cut aviation's emissions. It reports, as the group's own explanation, that IAG's profit fall came from a jet fuel price spike and not from the green rules.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “The amount of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) an airline is required to use is due to rise next year, under the proposed rules.”

    Why this matters
    City AM explains the mandate as a required amount of fuel that is rising, then moves straight to how much it will cost and whether supply exists. Nowhere does the article say what the sustainable fuel requirement is for.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away seeing the mandate only as a burden on airlines and passengers, with no stated purpose to weigh against the fare rises Gallego predicts.
    The context
    The point of a sustainable aviation fuel mandate is to cut aviation's greenhouse gas emissions, and cutting emissions is what limits further warming. The article never uses the words emissions, carbon or climate in its own voice, so the cost claims stand with nothing on the other side.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “emissions”, “carbon” and “climate”.
    • On the recordCutting greenhouse gas emissions is what limits further warming, and every increment of warming avoided reduces harm.ipcc.ch (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “The group said this hit to profit was due to the “significant increase in jet fuel prices from March onwards,” which was caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz following the outbreak of war in the Middle East.”

    The article attributes IAG's profit fall to the jet fuel price spike, as the group itself said, rather than letting the reader blame the green rules for it.

  • “British Airways owner warns green charges will ‘kill’ aviation industry”

    The headline keeps the 'kill' claim in quotation marks and attributes it to the airline owner, so it does not state the warning as fact.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 6 NovMust Sizewell C justify itself in pounds, shillings and pence?0.0

Everything we scored from City AM