The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 7 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Not destroying Iran's missiles, drones 'most significant failure,' former CENTCOM deputy cmdr. says

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The failure of the United States and Israel to destroy Iran's ballistic missile and drone capabilities is "probably the most significant failure" of the war, former US Central Command (CENTCOM) deputy commander Rear-Adm. (ret.) Robert Stiles Harward Jr. told KAN News' "International Hour" in an interview on Tuesday."These are Iran's main means of threatening American forces, Israel, and the countries of the region," said Harward. "Unfortunately, we have not been able to completely eliminate this threat, and it is very possible that it will be the main target of the next wave of military action."Harward told KAN that the existence of these capabilities, which he emphasized are the main power projection and pressure tools left in Tehran's arsenal, is a primary obstacle to the international community being able to support the Iranian population against the regime.Regarding US military operations in and around the Strait of Hormuz, Harward said that US President Donald Trump's administration maintains "complete control of the operational pace and is operating with successful deception that keeps everyone on their toes."Trump has threatened in recent days to renew strikes against Iran, but has also pursued a diplomatic solution through Qatari mediators.Harward: Trump can attack Iran 'whenever he wants'"The financial strangulation is already causing severe internal shocks in Iran, so time is working in Trump's favor," said Harward.

"He can wait and attack whenever he wants."In addition to military and naval blockades, the US Treasury Department has issued multiple sanctions , with the most recent sanctions targeting eight Canada-based money services firms that have allegedly facilitated transactions with sanctioned Iranian entities.

According to Harward, the US has multitudes of both kinetic and non-kinetic capabilities with which to increase pressure on Iran, though these would stop short of a nuclear attack, despite claims by controversial conservative commentator Tucker Carlson on Sunday that Trump may launch such an attack "within days.""

That would be a last resort and a most extreme option," Harward emphasized. "Any leader would hesitate to use it, especially when there are many conventional alternatives on the table." Examples of these capabilities listed by the former CENTCOM deputy commander included blockading Iran's remaining trade routes and using the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb, nicknamed "The Mother of All Bombs," against Iranian nuclear facilities.Sources say MOAB cannot strike deep Iranian targets, unlike MOPThe MOAB is the most powerful conventional weapon in the US military's arsenal, though it is not a "bunker buster" and is thus unable to penetrate deep enough to destroy buried targets, US officials told CNN in October.

In comparison, the smaller GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), the weapon dropped by US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bombers during Operation Midnight Hammer, is designed for such targets.Regardless of the methods used, Harward stressed that any Iranian regime loyal to the Islamic Revolution "will always have the motivation to restore its capabilities," ."An official declaration of a goal of regime change will strengthen trust and coordination with our partners in the Middle East," Harward noted."

This region holds 60% of the world's proven oil reserves," he added. ""Jerusalem Post Staff, Asher Smith, and Ariella Roitman contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post reports an interview in which a retired US admiral calls the failure to destroy Iran's missiles and drones the war's biggest failure, and it attributes his claims to him throughout. The Post calls Iran's government "the Islamic regime" in its own narration. It lets the admiral's warning about nuclear weapons and his call for regime change close the piece with no Iranian or IAEA voice set against them.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “against the Islamic regime”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration, outside any quotation from Harward, The Jerusalem Post calls Iran's government "the Islamic regime" when describing US Treasury sanctions.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as a neutral description that Iran is ruled by an illegitimate "regime" rather than a government, and that this is the paper's own factual label.
    The context
    This is a verdict word, not a description. The sentence reports a routine sanctions action, and a neutral report would say the Iranian government.

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “warning that this would include nuclear weapons if given the chance”

    Why this matters
    The Post paraphrases Harward's warning that Iran would build nuclear weapons if given the chance and sets no other account beside it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking Iran's nuclear programme is aimed at weapons and that this is settled.
    The context
    This is one retired US officer's claim. The article gives no IAEA finding and no Iranian statement on its nuclear programme.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “IAEA”.

    Show it in the article

    “The day after the Iranian threat is removed, the alliances being built now will allow the Middle East to become one of the most prosperous and secure regions in the world.”

    Why this matters
    The Post ends the article on Harward's call for regime change and his picture of the region after "the Iranian threat is removed". No Iranian official gets a word anywhere in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with only the US military view that removing Iran's government is the route to regional prosperity and security.
    The context
    The Post had reported Iran's foreign minister setting out Tehran's conditions and position a week earlier, but no Iranian voice appears in this article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “US officials told CNN in October”

    The Post attributes the claim about the MOAB's limits to its source rather than stating it as its own fact.

  • “Trump has threatened in recent days to renew strikes against Iran, but has also pursued a diplomatic solution through Qatari mediators”

    The Post names the US as the party threatening renewed strikes and also records the diplomatic track.

  • “that have allegedly facilitated transactions with sanctioned Iranian entities”

    The Post marks the sanctions accusation against the Canadian firms as an allegation rather than an established fact.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 7 NovExpanding on naval blockade, US military to create task force to restrict Iranian land commerce3.0
  2. 7 NovUS offers reward of up to $20 million, possible relocation for information on Iran nuclear program3.0
  3. 7 NovUS, Canada sanction eight money service firms over links to Iran0.0
  4. 7 NovTwo missiles struck Iran's Qeshm Island after aircraft heard above - report0.0
  5. 6 NovIran says it downed US MQ-1 drone over Qeshm Island0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post