Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on West Bank, 14 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

to

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findingsSee them marked on israelnationalnews.com

Dr. Kobi Barda, a senior researcher at the JPTI Institute, warns in the wake of the US midterm election results, "The first to suffer the hardest blow from the Democratic Party's gains in the United States will be the residents of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria. This is going to be very painful". In an interview with Arutz Sheva, he assessed that the apparent Democratic majority in Congress could lead to significant sanctions against the settlement enterprise, including measures targeting financial institutions in Israel.

Left out here: Hedges the documented record

The article turns on possible sanctions against the settlement enterprise, but it never says the settlements are illegal under international law or that the West Bank is occupied. Without this, a reader takes sanctions as a hostile political move against lawful Jewish towns, not a response to settlements the ICJ has found illegal.

How we know

  • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
  • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

He warned that President Donald Trump would not necessarily be able or willing to prevent all of them. Barda described the election results as an exceptionally sweeping victory for the Democratic Party. According to the figures and projections available to him at the time of the interview, he said, the Democrats' margin in the House of Representatives could reach about 100 seats, compared with the Republicans' five-seat advantage in the outgoing Congress.

In the Senate, he estimated, the Democrats could secure 56 seats to the Republicans' 44. He emphasized, "This is a victory of biblical proportions for the Democratic Party", noting that Democrats had also made what he described as exceptional gains in states considered Republican strongholds. As an example, he cited Kansas, where he said a Democratic senator had been elected for the first time in 94 years. In his assessment, the main implication for Israel concerns the expected shift in Congress's approach to .

Barda pointed to remarks by pro-Israel US Ambassador Mike Huckabee concerning "Jewish terrorism" in Judea and Samaria. He said that when even figures known for their strong support for Israel use such terms, Democratic members of Congress could view this as grounds for pursuing tougher measures. He warned, "I am talking about individual sanctions, I am talking about regional sanctions, I am talking about sanctions covering entire areas".

He estimated that the shift could begin as early as January 3, when the new Congress takes office. He believes that even if Trump vetoes some measures, Israel could still be affected by other decisions. The most severe scenario he outlined involves restrictions on Israel's banking system. Barda fears that Congress could pursue sanctions against banks and financial institutions that finance settlement-related activity, including construction and mortgages.

He said, "In practice, this means bringing the settlement enterprise to a halt". He said violent incidents involving rioters in Judea and Samaria in recent months had damaged Israel's international standing, including among those who had previously been sympathetic toward it. He believes that a new Israeli government presenting a shift in enforcement policy and taking practical steps on the ground could be given some time to demonstrate its intentions.

He clarified, "I cannot guarantee that such a thing would actually work", but assessed that without a policy change, the impact on the settlement enterprise could be immediate. At the same time, he warned against relying exclusively on Trump to protect Israeli interests. He said a tendency was already emerging among the president's associates to place some of the blame for the Republican defeat on Israel and US involvement in the Middle East.

Barda referred to remarks he attributed to Vice President JD Vance following the elections. He claimed that Vance had listed four reasons for the Republicans' failure, all related to Israel, and had even called for a change in relations between the countries. He said the remarks had also received public support from Trump's son, adding, "This means that the pressure has begun to shift to Trump, who would find it convenient to blame Israel for the defeat.

My assessment is that, as time goes on, we will see more and more statements from him, because this will help him distance himself from the failure". Barda stressed that he could not determine whether Trump would actually reduce his commitment to Israel. However, he believes the political changes in Washington require Jerusalem to reassess its foreign policy and its relations with other countries. Barda warned of the possible consequences of failing to change policy in light of the new balance of power in Washington, "If we cannot form a different government, one that presents a different face and tries to demonstrate a different approach to what is happening, the sanctions they are going to impose on us will be very severe".

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Arutz Sheva reports one researcher's forecast that a Democratic Congress could sanction Israel's settlements. In its own voice it calls the occupied West Bank "Judea and Samaria" and the settlements "Jewish communities", and its headline drops the attribution to state his forecast as "a new threat". It never tells its reader that the ICJ found the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    In the headline, in its own voice, Arutz Sheva calls the settlements "Jewish communities" and the occupied West Bank "Judea and Samaria".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the places at risk of sanctions to be ordinary Jewish towns in a region with a settled Israeli name, not settlements in occupied territory.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful and its settlements there illegal. The article's own body calls the target of possible sanctions the settlement enterprise.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“significant sanctions against the settlement enterprise”

    Show it in the article

    “Israeli policy in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    In its own paraphrase of Barda, the outlet again writes "Judea and Samaria" for the place where Israel's policy is applied.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Israel's conduct there to be normal domestic policy in Israeli land, which Congress might simply disagree with.
    The context
    The policy is the conduct of an occupying power in territory the ICJ found to be unlawfully occupied.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Republican defeat and a new threat”

    Why this matters
    The headline states "a new threat" as a fact, with no attribution to anyone.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that the election result has created a concrete danger to the settlements.
    The context
    The body gives only one researcher's forecast, hedged throughout: Congress "could" act, Barda "fears" it, and he says he cannot guarantee outcomes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“he assessed that the apparent Democratic majority in Congress could lead”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Barda fears that Congress could pursue sanctions”

    Show it in the article

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article turns on possible sanctions against the settlement enterprise, but it never says the settlements are illegal under international law or that the West Bank is occupied. Without this, a reader takes sanctions as a hostile political move against lawful Jewish towns, not a response to settlements the ICJ has found illegal.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show where it belongs

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 13 NovCommunity security in focus as Judea and Samaria Division prepares for 20277.3
  2. 13 NovMilitary boots raised suspicions: Secret Gaza border map seized from Palestinian home6.0
  3. 12 NovPolice demolish three homes and sheep pen in Kfar Tarfon6.0
  4. 12 NovTerrorist Admits: 'I planned to stab a settler'8.0
  5. 11 Nov13 US attorney generals oppose European sanctions6.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News