The Spectator opinion piece, on UK Politics, 22 October 2026

The Spectator's Steerpike diary item reports that the Home Office spent £21,635 developing guidance for asylum seekers. Its headline puts the phrase 'don't rape women' in quotation marks as though it named or described the guide, when nobody in the article says it and the document reported the same day is a general guide to behaviours and expectations in the UK with a section on sex and consent.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

3.0

Minor

out of 10

What we found

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “‘don’t rape women’ guide”

    What the words do
    Puts a phrase in quotation marks as if it described or named the Home Office guide.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the Home Office produced a document whose purpose, and wording, was to tell asylum seekers not to rape women.
    What is actually the case
    Nobody in the article says this phrase. The document reported on the same day is titled 'Understanding behaviours and expectations in the UK: a guide for asylum seekers', a general induction guide with a section on sex and consent.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Home Office spend thousands on

Oh dear. It seems that the Home Office has got it wrong again. Back in August, there was an outcry after officials published guidance for asylum seekers telling them, er, not to rape or sexually harass people – including partners and children. Nice! The nine-page document told new arrivals – including those charming chaps landing on our shores – that women are allowed to ‘earn their own money’ and ‘make their own decisions about their lives’. A novelty for some of them, eh? Now Mr S has done some digging and uncovered the cost of the hastily-disowned document. A written question put down by Neil Shastri-Hurst to ministers has found that while ‘no physical materials have been printed, ordered or distributed’, the ‘total cost of the development off the posters and the leaflets was £21,635’. The Tory MP fumed to Steerpike: It is frankly ludicrous the government has spent taxpayers’ money on producing a publication that should never have been required in the first place. It is no wonder the public, quite rightly, are despairing at this government’s priorities. Such a shame that the Office for Value for Money has been scrapped eh…

Read the original article on spectator.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Spectator

Everything we scored from The Spectator