Deutsche Welle (English), on Gaza, 30 September 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Gaza: NGO reports dire camp conditions, says Israel is moving 'Yellow Line'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

A new report on conditions in the Gaza Strip says that the roughly 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza, or 86% of the population, living in displacement sites often face inhumane living conditions. The Danish Refugee Council (DRC) published its findings on Thursday, almost three years after , and a year after the phased October 10 ceasefire plan that was supposed to usher in the war's end.

"The October 2025 ceasefire in Gaza was supposed to end civilians' suffering. Nearly a year on, it exists largely in name only. Displacement in Gaza has not ended; it has changed shape," the report says. The findings are based on group discussions with 195 people living in internal displacement camps across five governorates in Gaza. What did the DRC say about the Yellow Line? Entitled "Confined by Design: The Human Cost of Protracted Displacement in Gaza," the report accuses Israel of "a policy of protracted displacement" since the ceasefire deal was reached .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article quotes the report that the ceasefire exists "largely in name only" but never says Israeli forces have killed at least 1,430 people since it was signed, including eight on the day the report came out. Without it, a reader may think the ceasefire failed only on displacement, not that Israel kept killing people almost daily.

How we know

One means of ensuring this, the DRC says, is the so-called "Yellow Line," which demarcates the area of eastern Gaza near the border that is controlled by the Israeli military and is, according to the report, creeping toward the coast. "In addition to protracted displacement for hundreds of thousands of people, the defining feature of the so-called ceasefire is the Yellow Line which continues expanding westward and swallowing up more land, effectively squeezing families into 30% of Gaza's territory," said the NGO's country director for the occupied Palestinian territories , Alan Moseley.

The 'Yellow Line' devides Gaza into two sections Image: Omar Ashtawy/APAimages/IMAGO Other groups, including the UN, have also reported the westward movement of the Yellow Line, as has the Israeli government , although some details differ. Last month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu put the share of Gaza's territory inside the Yellow Line at 60% rather than 70%, but he also said the plan was to expand the area. The DRC report also said aid organizations "describe being unable to operate within several kilometers of the line, either due to access constraints or security concerns."

It said that this led to crucial aid and supplies failing to reach displacement camps nearer the boundary. What did the report say about living conditions in displacement camps? The DRC and the Agricultural Development Association (PARC) highlighted a series of major shortcomings in the often informal tent shelters and makeshift camps , where more than eight in 10 residents are believed to be living.

These included but were not limited to: 80% of respondents reporting shortages of water both for washing and drinking Displaced households relying on outdoor cesspits Multiple families sharing single latrines, increasing the risk of gender-based violence and abuse Rat and rodent infestations exacerbated by the unsanitary conditions Food scarcity and lacking infrastructure for cooking, increasing risks of burns or injury preparing meals Rapid localized spread of illnesses and infections.

For instance, more than 4,000 chickenpox cases were recorded in Khan Younis displacement camps in July alone Lacking and overburdened medical facilities with only half of hospitals and just over a third of primary healthcare centers still operational Lacking or non-existent formal education provision for young people, now lasting almost three years in some cases Reports of security concerns, particularly among men, Safety risks posed by unexploded and undiscovered ordnance, particularly when trying to clear rubble or return to areas where people originally lived The report warned of growing risks of domestic violence, citing both limited and shared facilities, and deteriorating mental health of adult males in the circumstances Image: Mohammad Kuhil/Danish Refugee Council The Danish Refugee Council also laid particular emphasis on lacking site management mechanisms at displacement camps.

It said only 36% of sites currently had a designated site manager, typically a national NGO, coordinating services and managing conditions. Sites with such partners "have a structured community channel through which a gap, such as a collapsing cesspit, a missing water delivery, or an unsafe walkway, can be identified, escalated, and resolved," the report said. Israel has not yet commented on the newly released report. What actions did the DRC recommend?

The DRC and PARC issued a number of appeals and recommendations, some to "all parties to the conflict," most to "the Government of Israel, as the occupying power of Gaza" and others to "the international community" and "donors and humanitarian actors." These included: Completely upholding pledges to cease hostilities Ending attacks against civilians, humanitarian workers and medical personnel Guaranteeing humanitarian access and medical evacuation pathways Supporting the establishment of a UN mechanism to monitor ceasefire violations.

The groups called on Israel to "halt the further expansion of the Yellow Line" and to "disclose its current and future route transparently." They also urged Israel to cease the construction of permanent military infrastructure in the area and to provide "credible assurance that current troop positions are not intended to be permanent." They appealed for fewer restrictions on aid access, particularly so-called "dual-use" restrictions affecting medical supplies, water, sanitation and hygiene items, pest control, rubble removal and fuel.

The report also warned that political and donor interest in the situation had declined markedly in the year since the ceasefire, even though conditions had not improved proportionately. UN report condemns Israeli military action in Gaza To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Louis Oelofse If you rely on our team for trusted reporting, please take a moment to select us as your Preferred Source on Google , so you'll always see our verified news first.

Read the original article on dw.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Deutsche Welle reports the Danish Refugee Council's findings on displacement camps and the Yellow Line with careful attribution. It names the 7 October attack as terror in its own voice but calls Israel's assault only "the war in Gaza", never naming the genocide. It removes Israel as the actor behind the rubble and the ongoing strikes and gunfire that shape the camps.

  1. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “that have sprung up amid Gaza's rubble”

    Why this matters
    DW says the camps "have sprung up amid Gaza's rubble" as if the rubble had no cause.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees the ruin of Gaza as a backdrop, not as something a named party did.
    The context
    Israeli forces bombed Gaza into that rubble. DW's own earlier report speaks of Israel's attack on Gaza, and other coverage names Israeli forces as having killed more than 74,000 Palestinians.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “because of the continued presence of artillery strikes, drones and stray gunfire”

    Why this matters
    DW lists "artillery strikes, drones and stray gunfire" as a "presence" with no one firing them, and "stray" suggests accident.
    The impression it gives
    A reader thinks the danger in the camps is random leftover violence with no actor during a ceasefire.
    The context
    The same day's coverage reports Israeli strikes killing eight people and Israeli forces killing at least 1,430 people since the ceasefire, with near-daily bombing raids.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Displaced Palestinians live in tents amid the ruins left by Israel's bombardment, and men reported fearing continued Israeli artillery strikes, drones and gunfire.

  2. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “the October 7 terror attacks against Israel that triggered the war in Gaza”

    Why this matters
    DW calls 7 October "terror attacks" in its own voice. It calls Israel's assault only "the war in Gaza", which those attacks "triggered".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Israel's assault as a reactive war with no finding against it, while only the Palestinian side's violence carries a verdict.
    The context
    The UN Commission of Inquiry found that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ has issued provisional measures in the genocide case. Other coverage of the same day calls it Israel's genocide. The article never uses the word, though the displacement it reports comes from that assault.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article quotes the report that the ceasefire exists "largely in name only" but never says Israeli forces have killed at least 1,430 people since it was signed, including eight on the day the report came out. Without it, a reader may think the ceasefire failed only on displacement, not that Israel kept killing people almost daily.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Deutsche Welle (English)

Everything we scored from Deutsche Welle (English)