The Telegraph, on West Bank, 27 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

British MPs ‘detained by Israeli authorities for eight hours’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Two MPs and an MSP to the West Bank . Labour’s Clive Lewis and the SNP’s Lara Bird, along with Kate Nevens of the Scottish Greens, sought to enter the territory on Monday as part of a delegation organised by political group Progressive International. According to Progressive International, the delegation – which also included Sam Tarry, a former Labour MP, and Josu Estarrona Elizondo, a Spanish senator – was stopped while making the crossing from Jordan.

They had planned to undertake “a programme of meetings with Palestinian academics, students and civil society organisations” as well as to join the olive harvest . The Israeli embassy said the group were refused entry after “providing false information about the purpose of their visit” and failing to co-operate with officials. The incident took place before Tuesday’s Israeli elections in which Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, could be ousted from power.

In a post on X, Mr Lewis said: “For more than eight hours, we were held, interrogated and made to feel as though we had done something wrong simply by attempting to enter. “The simple truth is we had done nothing wrong. “We went to show our support for the Palestinian people and highlight the terrible injustice and violence being perpetrated against them. “We want to ensure that people back home do not look away from the reality of what is happening.

“Ultimately, we went to show solidarity. But we left with an even greater determination to speak out. “We will not be silenced, and we will not look away. None of us should.” Ms Bird, who was elected this year to the Arbroath and Broughty Ferry seat on Scotland’s east coast, posted: “We were held for eight hours, interrogated and ultimately prevented from crossing the border. “I came to stand alongside Palestinians being attacked for harvesting olives on their own land.

Instead, we were turned away, with no reason given. “More than ever, Palestinians are being subject to terror and violence by the IDF and illegal settlers. “Increased blockades, demolitions and unthinkable violence have become the norm for Palestinians in the West Bank. “It is more important now than ever that we bear witness and show our solidarity.”

Ms Nevens, a Green MSP, added: “We had travelled to the West Bank to stand in solidarity with Palestinians facing escalating violence, and to join the olive harvesters . “We went to bear witness, to listen to Palestinian communities and to help shine a light on the abuses taking place. “The Israeli forces didn’t want us to see the demolished homes, or the settlers inflicting so much misery or the day to day indignities that are so central to the occupation.”

Ed Miliband , the Foreign Secretary, said he was “deeply concerned” about the incident. In the Commons, Dr Simon Opher, the Labour MP for Stroud, asked whether Mr Miliband would join him in condemning the blocking of MPs from entering the territory. The Foreign Secretary responded: “We are obviously deeply concerned about the denial of entry to the West Bank for two Members of Parliament, and I believe one member of the Scottish Parliament as well.

“We have raised this issue with the Israeli authorities and been in touch with the MPs to offer assistance. “More broadly, it’s very, very important that members of this House, as they go about their business – not just in the UK but internationally – have free access so that they can actually do their duties.” The embassy of Israel in the UK said: “”

Read the original article on telegraph.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Telegraph turns settler attacks on olive farmers, which it reported as fact four days earlier, into a campaign group's claim with no attacker named. It adds an unsourced line suggesting the MPs could have sought permission, puts a refusal of entry the Israeli embassy itself confirms under 'have claimed', and closes on the embassy's accusation that the group lied.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “after what it claimed were “mounting attacks” against farmers in the territory”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph wraps 'mounting attacks' in quotation marks and 'what it claimed', making the attacks Progressive International's allegation. It also names no attacker.
    The impression it gives
    A reader thinks the attacks on olive farmers are an activist group's unproven claim, with no known perpetrator.
    The context
    Four days earlier the Telegraph reported in its own voice that extremist Israeli settlers were mounting attacks on Palestinian olive harvesters. Other coverage of this event names escalating Israeli settler violence during the harvest.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    They had planned to meet Palestinian academics, students and civil society groups and to join the olive harvest, amid mounting attacks by Israeli settlers on Palestinian harvesters.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “The group was refused entry to Israel after failing to co-operate with border officials and providing false information about the purpose of their visit.”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph closes the article on the Israeli embassy's statement. It accuses the legislators of lying and calls their destination 'Israel', and the Telegraph adds nothing after it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader leaves believing the group lied to officials while trying to enter Israel, and that this is the settled end of the matter.
    The context
    The delegation was trying to reach the occupied West Bank, not Israel, and the ICJ has found that occupation unlawful. The MPs dispute the accusation in this same article. Bird said they were turned away with no reason given, and Lewis said they had done nothing wrong. The Telegraph never sets these against the embassy's closing words.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“we were turned away, with no reason given”
    • Elsewhere in the article“we had done nothing wrong”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  3. Unsourced insinuation

    Minor

    “Reports suggest the two MPs could have sought permission to access the West Bank from the Israeli government.”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph drops an unattributed 'reports suggest' between the MPs' quotes. It names no report, no source and no permission process.
    The impression it gives
    A reader infers the MPs skipped an available route and brought the refusal on themselves, which echoes the embassy's charge that they did not co-operate.
    The context
    The article names no report and gives no detail of what permission was available or whether it would have been granted. The claim rests on nothing the reader can check.

    Show it in the article

  4. Treats a confirmed fact as a claim

    Minor

    “have claimed they were detained for eight hours by Israeli authorities and denied entry”

    Why this matters
    The Telegraph's opening line puts the denial of entry under 'have claimed', alongside the detention.
    The impression it gives
    A reader thinks even the refusal of entry is only the legislators' allegation.
    The context
    The Israeli embassy itself confirms the group was refused entry, and the Foreign Secretary speaks of the denial of entry as fact. Only the length and conduct of the detention rests on the legislators' account.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The group was refused entry to Israel”
    • Elsewhere in the article“deeply concerned about the denial of entry to the West Bank”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Telegraph

Everything we scored from The Telegraph