LBC opinion piece, on UK Politics, 11 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found
About this analysis

Lisa Farmer, chief executive of a veterans' employment charity, argues that spending on employment support now will cut the welfare bill later. She draws on one veteran's story and the Sure Start programme. The column states its argument openly, attributes its key figure to the Institute for Fiscal Studies and declares the author's role, and nothing in it misleads the reader.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

What it gets right

  • “the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimated benefits to individuals and society worth £2.05 for every £1 spent”

    The column names the source of its return-on-investment figure and presents it as an estimate, not as settled fact.

  • “Lisa Farmer is the CEO of Royal British Veterans Enterprise.”

    LBC declares the author's interest, so readers know she runs a charity that would benefit from the funding she argues for.

  • “it's a fair question”

    The author acknowledges the legitimate debate over whether upfront spending delivers results before making her case.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 11 NovI will argue for Britain's future in the EU within my own party, writes Scottish Labour leader Michael Marra0.0
  2. 10 NovMinisters 'looking at what they can do' about injunctions after David Walliams unmasked0.0
  3. 10 NovSurrey County Council not backing down over refusal to put up ULEZ signs0.0
  4. 10 NovKemi Badenoch says having ADHD does not justify disability benefits as she unveils plan to cut £36billion from welfare bill8.0
  5. 10 Nov'It was a long time ago': Education Secretary defends Ed Miliband over appearance on Russell Brand’s YouTube show0.0

Everything we scored from LBC