Press TV, on Iran, 14 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee them marked on presstv.co.uk

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei says the United States has openly acknowledged its pursuit of war crimes by threatening to starve the Iranian people through a blockade. In a post on his X account on Saturday, Baqaei cited a remark by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said that Iranians would eventually have to eat, describing it as an open and insolent threat to starve the Iranian people through a blockade. “They have to eat eventually,” the U.S. Secretary of State has declared - openly and insolently threatening to starve Iranians through a blockade.

This is yet another admission that Washington is pursuing war crimes, compounding the atrocities it has already committed in its wars… — Esmaeil Baqaei (@IRIMFA_SPOX) November 14, 2026 “This is yet another admission that Washington is pursuing war crimes, compounding the atrocities it has already committed in its wars of aggression and economic terrorism against Iran,” he added. Despite decades of failed attempts to force Iran into submission through coercion, threats, sanctions, terrorism and aggression, the United States continues to repeat the same mistakes, merely presenting its policies “under new names,” he emphasized.

The Iranian spokesperson described Washington’s approach as a textbook example of what historian Barbara Tuchman called a March of Folly, in which governments persist with disastrous policies, refuse to learn from past failures and become increasingly entrenched in their mistakes with each successive defeat. Iran and the US signed a memorandum of understanding in June to end the cycle arising from the latest bout of , which had begun on February 28.

However, . The US also resumed its aerial assaults on Iran and imposed a naval blockade of the country in violation of the war-ending deal. On August 24, the United States unveiled under the “Operation Economic Outcast,” threatening secondary penalties against any country or entity maintaining trade ties with Tehran .

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the measures target Iran’s financial networks worldwide and warned that no partner is beyond Washington’s reach. A New York Times report has recently revealed that US attempts to tighten the blockade of Iran by closing its land routes have failed as neighboring countries are reluctant to follow Washington’s orders. According to the outlet, US officials have tried and failed to diplomatically pressure Iran’s neighbors into shuttering their border crossings.

It says those neighboring countries, primarily Turkey, Iraq and Pakistan, are increasingly wary and disgruntled by US policies they say could hurt them as much as Tehran.

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Press TV reports Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei's charge that a remark by Marco Rubio amounts to a threat to starve Iranians, and it attributes his words to him properly. In its own narration, though, the outlet states Iran's government's contested positions as fact: that the US and Israeli attacks from February 28 were unprovoked, that a US corridor near Oman was unsafe and meant to undermine Iranian sovereignty, and that the August sanctions are illegal and have failed. It also puts 'so-called' before the official name of the US sanctions programme.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “unprovoked American-Israeli aggression against the Islamic Republic”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the US and Israeli attacks that began on February 28 "unprovoked American-Israeli aggression" in its own narration, not in Baqaei's words.
    The impression it gives
    That it is an established fact that the attacks had no provocation at all.
    The context
    Whether the attacks were provoked is a contested judgement between the parties. The article gives no source for it and offers no US or Israeli account of the attacks. It belongs to Iran's government and should be attributed to it.

    Show it in the article

    “the US attempted to undermine Iran’s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz by establishing an unsafe corridor near the Omani shores”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states in its own voice that the US aimed to undermine Iranian sovereignty and that the corridor it set up was "unsafe".
    The impression it gives
    That the US purpose and the danger of the corridor are established facts.
    The context
    This is Iran's government's reading of a US move. The article cites no source, no evidence that the corridor was unsafe, and no US explanation of what the corridor was for.

    Show it in the article

    “the new wave of illegal sanctions against Iran”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls the August sanctions "illegal" as plain fact in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    That a legal authority has found these sanctions unlawful.
    The context
    The article names no court, body or legal finding. The only official account it gives presents the measures as targeting financial networks. The illegality is Iran's position and needs attribution.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the measures target Iran’s financial networks worldwide”

    Show it in the article

    “in a failed attempt to achieve through economic coercion what its military aggression could not”

    Why this matters
    Press TV asserts the US motive behind the sanctions and declares them a failure in its own voice, only months after they were imposed.
    The impression it gives
    That the sanctions' purpose and their failure are established.
    The context
    The article offers no evidence that the sanctions have failed. The New York Times report it cites concerns the land-route blockade, not the August sanctions, and the brief rules out stating a government's unseen motive as fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“US attempts to tighten the blockade of Iran by closing its land routes have failed”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran says the February 28 attacks were unprovoked and that the US breached the June memorandum by resuming air strikes and imposing a naval blockade. On August 24 the US announced new sanctions, which Iran calls illegal; US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said they target Iran's financial networks.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “so-called”

    Why this matters
    Press TV puts "so-called" before the official name of the US sanctions programme in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    That the name itself is illegitimate or deceptive.
    The context
    "Operation Economic Outcast" is simply the name the US gave the programme. The sneer is the outlet's own and carries a verdict that no fact in the article supports.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 13 NovMassive explosion as violating LPG carrier hits naval mine east of Strait of Hormuz: IRGC6.0
  2. 13 NovIranians bid farewell to 350 unidentified martyrs of Iraqi imposed war on Iran6.0
  3. 12 NovAnalyst: Europeans, like Americans, reject war on Iran0.0
  4. 10 NovIAEA double standards expose Western bias against Iran: Analyst3.0
  5. 8 NovIran prepared to make any new US aggression far more costly: Analyst0.0

Everything we scored from Press TV