LBC, on UK Politics, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Labour MP forced to apologise for breaching bullying and harassment rules

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

A Labour MP has been forced to apologise after breaching Parliament’s bullying and harassment policy by hugging a woman without her consent and behaving towards her "in an overbearing and belittling manner”. Tony Vaughan, MP for Folkestone and Hythe, has been ordered to apologise to the floor of the House of Commons following a report by the Independent Expert Panel (IEP), which handles Parliamentary misconduct complaints. It comes after a woman accused Mr Vaughan of having “behaved towards [her] in an overbearing and belittling manner” during her employment.

In one claim, she said the MP hugged her without her consent at an office event. Mr Vaughan also allegedly took her personal mobile phone from her hand to join an online meeting without asking permission. Read more: Former Labour MP facing multiple sexual harassment claims quits party Read more: Man, 41, admits harassment towards Labour MP Chris Webb Mr Vaughan rang her to find out where his next meeting was and abruptly hung up once she had confirmed the location, she said.

He then allegedly rang back five minutes later to complain she had given him the incorrect address. After she confirmed he was in fact at the correct address, the call again reportedly ended abruptly. Mr Vaughan failed to explain why these phone calls ended in this way, the IEP's report said. The sub-panel said the MP’s “oppressive and bullying behaviour towards [MPs’] staff members is wholly unacceptable”. It added that his actions amounted to breaches of “ basic boundaries and courtesy” rather than failures in management, and an abuse of his power.

The sub-panel ruled that the Labour MP must make an unreserved apology to the complainant and a personal statement in the House of Commons Chamber.

Left out here: One side gets the space

The article never says that the panel's report found Mr Vaughan had "expressed genuine and thoughtful remorse", or that he said he accepted the findings in full and had undertaken further training. It also omits that he appealed and that the panel confirmed the majority, not all, of the Commissioner's findings. A reader hears nothing of his response and may assume every allegation was upheld and that he contested the outcome.

How we know

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

LBC reports that the Labour MP Tony Vaughan was ordered to apologise after the Independent Expert Panel found he breached Parliament's bullying and harassment policy. It attributes each allegation to the complainant or the panel and quotes the panel's findings directly. Nothing in it misleads. Its one gap is minor: it never says that the panel's report found Mr Vaughan had expressed remorse, or that he accepted the findings.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the panel's report found Mr Vaughan had "expressed genuine and thoughtful remorse", or that he said he accepted the findings in full and had undertaken further training. It also omits that he appealed and that the panel confirmed the majority, not all, of the Commissioner's findings. A reader hears nothing of his response and may assume every allegation was upheld and that he contested the outcome.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Tony Vaughan, MP for Folkestone and Hythe, has been ordered to apologise to the floor of the House of Commons following a report by the Independent Expert Panel (IEP)”

    LBC names the MP, his seat and the body that made the finding, so the reader knows who was found at fault and by whom.

  • “Mr Vaughan also allegedly took her personal mobile phone from her hand”

    LBC attributes the individual allegations rather than stating them as fact in its own voice.

  • “his actions amounted to breaches of “ basic boundaries and courtesy” rather than failures in management, and an abuse of his power”

    LBC gives the panel's own characterisation of the conduct, attributed to the panel, rather than its own verdict.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 29 Oct'People are sick of excuses': Four UK water firms handed one-star environmental ratings - as bosses bonuses blocked0.0
  2. 29 OctNumber of applicants applying to most selective university courses falls0.0
  3. 29 Oct'Brexit has certainly hit our level of growth', Chancellor admits - but insists UK economy has been 'remarkably resilient'0.0
  4. 29 OctBudget 2026: Burnham's budget praised as 'dullest in a long time' by Lord O Neill - as he lauds PM for not 'clobbering business'0.0
  5. 28 OctGambling firms backlash after Chancellor hits them with tax rise3.0

Everything we scored from LBC