Australia Bars Citizen Returning From Roj Camp, Issues Temporary Exclusion Order Citing Security Advice
Image: The Sun Malaysia

Australia Bars Citizen Returning From Roj Camp, Issues Temporary Exclusion Order Citing Security Advice

18 February, 2026.Australia.14 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Australia issued a temporary exclusion order barring a Roj camp detainee, on security agencies' advice.
  • Thirty-four Australian women and children left Roj camp but were turned back and returned.
  • Australian government warned returnees who committed crimes will face prosecution and prioritised national security.

Temporary exclusion order

Australia has used a rarely-invoked counterterrorism power to temporarily bar one citizen from returning from the Roj detention camp in northeastern Syria, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said.

A planned transfer of 34 Australians out of the Roj detention camp in northeastern Syria broke down on Monday when their convoy, which had left the camp under Kurdish military escort en route to Damascus, was stopped about 50 km into the journey and sent back

7NEWS7NEWS

Burke said he issued a temporary exclusion order on the advice of security agencies.

Image from 7NEWS
7NEWS7NEWS

Officials said the measure can last up to two years and was applied after security agencies advised the individual met the risk threshold.

The person is part of a larger group of some 34 Australians linked to suspected Islamic State members whose planned travel out of the camp was halted and reversed.

Kurdish officials and multiple reports said the group were escorted toward Damascus but were turned back, with Kurdish officials citing 'poor coordination' with Syrian authorities.

Canberra says it will not provide assisted repatriation while conducting security assessments.

Australian repatriation issues

The blocked return forms part of a wider, messy repatriation picture.

Multiple sources report roughly three dozen Australians in al-Roj and say some were handed to family members, put on buses and escorted toward Damascus before being returned for administrative or "technical" reasons.

Image from 9News.au
9News.au9News.au

Numbers and labels vary across reports — some outlets cite 34 people in the latest group, while other coverage and summaries note different totals for Australians in camps.

Kurdish control of al-Roj and shifting control in neighbouring camps complicate movement and paperwork.

Exclusion order legal backdrop

Australian advocacy groups — notably Save the Children Australia — have pursued court action seeking repatriation for women and children held in northeastern Syria.

A 2023 suit on behalf of 11 women and 20 children was dismissed by the Federal Court, which found Australia did not control their detention in Syria.

At the same time, Canberra says security agencies must assess risk and that the exclusion power, introduced in 2019, can be invoked where agencies advise the person poses a security threat.

Debate over repatriation policy

The political and public debate is sharp.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has publicly said the government will not assist repatriation of people who went to support Islamic State, saying 'You make your bed, you lie in it'.

Image from Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Australian Broadcasting CorporationAustralian Broadcasting Corporation

He emphasised that adults who adopted extremist views face scrutiny.

Various humanitarians and relatives press for the return of children who they say are victims of their parents' choices.

Commentaries link the issue to domestic politics and public sensitivity around terrorism and immigration.

Repatriation status and uncertainty

Australia repatriated small groups in 2022 and some Australians have returned without government assistance.

Image from BBC
BBCBBC

Broadcasters and regional reporting note routes and embassy involvement in past returns and warn that shifting control in Syria makes future efforts unpredictable.

Observers say security agencies are still assessing whether others meet the threshold for exclusion orders, leaving the wider cohort in legal and practical limbo.

More on Australia