
Iran Executes Over 1,000 Prisoners in Largest Wave of Political Killings Since 1979
Key Takeaways
- Iran executed Bahman Choobiasl, accused of spying for Israel’s Mossad in telecommunications.
- Over 1,000 people have been executed in Iran in 2025, the highest since 1988.
- Executions surged amid escalating Iran-Israel espionage conflict and domestic unrest.
Increase in Executions in Iran
In 2025, Iran has witnessed a dramatic surge in executions, with over 1,000 people reportedly put to death, marking the highest rate since 1988.
“Iran has executed Bahman Choobiasl, who was accused of spying for Israel's Mossad”
This increase is largely attributed to the Iranian government's response to internal unrest and external pressures, including renewed UN sanctions related to its nuclear program.

Human rights organizations, such as Iran Human Rights and the Abdorrahman Boroumand Center, have highlighted the lack of transparency in these executions, suggesting that the actual numbers could be even higher.
The executions have been described as a severe violation of human rights by UN experts, who have condemned the scale of the killings as an "industrial scale" of hangings.
Executions for Espionage Accusations
The executions have been particularly focused on individuals accused of espionage, with at least nine people executed on such charges since June.
Notable cases include Babak Shahbazi and Bahman Choobiasl, both accused of spying for Israel.
Activists claim that Shahbazi was coerced into a false confession, while Choobiasl was involved in sensitive telecommunications projects.
These executions are part of Iran's broader strategy to counter perceived threats from Israel, especially following Israeli airstrikes that killed around 1,100 people, including military leaders.
Global Response to Executions
The international community has reacted with alarm to the surge in executions.
“Iran executed Bahman Choubi-asl, accused of being a key Israeli spy, according to Iranian judiciary news outlet Mizan”
UN human rights experts have issued a joint statement condemning the executions as a grave violation of the right to life.
They noted that many of the executions were for drug-related offenses, which do not meet the "most serious crimes" threshold under international law.
The experts also highlighted that these executions disproportionately affect marginalized ethnic minorities, who face additional human rights abuses.
Iran's Internal and External Challenges
The domestic situation in Iran is marked by widespread protests over economic hardships, women's rights, and demands for political reform.
These internal pressures have been compounded by external conflicts, particularly with Israel, leading to a cycle of violence and retaliation.

Iran's execution spree is seen as a method to suppress dissent and project strength amid these challenges.
The executions have also been linked to Iran's broader geopolitical strategy, as the country faces renewed sanctions and international isolation.
Criticism of Iranian Executions
The Iranian government's actions have drawn criticism from various international bodies and human rights organizations.
“The article details the escalating espionage conflict between Iran and Israel following Israel's June Mossad operation inside Iran”
These groups argue that the executions are a tool for political repression.

The lack of transparency and due process in these cases has been a major point of contention.
The executions are seen as part of a broader pattern of human rights abuses in Iran.
These abuses include restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly, as well as discrimination against women and minorities.
More on Iran-Israel

U.S. Intercepts Iran Message Activating Sleeper Cells After U.S.-Israel Strike Kills Khamenei
14 sources compared

Israel Bombs Tehran Oil Depots, Blankets Capital With Toxic Black Smoke and Oil Rain
11 sources compared

U.S. and Israel Kill Iran's Supreme Leader, Trigger Regional War
49 sources compared
Iran Kills Seventh U.S. Service Member After Attack on Saudi Military Base
16 sources compared