Trump Conditions U.S.-Saudi Civil Nuclear Deal on Abraham Accords With Israel
Image: 조선일보

USA · 24 July, 2026 · 3 min read

Trump Conditions U.S.-Saudi Civil Nuclear Deal on Abraham Accords With Israel

Happened

Trump conditioned the U.S.-Saudi civil nuclear deal on Saudi recognition of Israel. Some reports claim no link between the deal and Israel normalization.

Split on

Trump’s condition treated as unexpected in one account, broadly anticipated in others.

Left out

11 of 12 outlets skipped it: ABC says enrichment depends on a two-year study..

128outlets compared

20 MinutenAajilABC NewsABC News & Headlines – Australian Broadcasting CorporationAkhbar Al-KhaleejAl JazeeraAl-HurraAl-Jazeera Net

Same story, two versions

tap a side to read it in full

CNN ArabicCNN Arabic

negotiators themselves... did not expect the Abraham Accords condition.
Read the original

Global Banking & Finance ReviewGlobal Banking & Finance Review

"It was always understood, and Chris knew, and Saudi Arabia knew,"
Read the original
VS

CNN Arabic blames the administration process; Global Banking cites “always understood”

Deal signed, then flipped

On Wednesday afternoon, officials at the U.S. Department of Energy headquarters in downtown Washington gathered for the signing of a civil nuclear agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia, with U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Ray and a large screen showing Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman from Riyadh.

On Wednesday afternoon, officials at the U.S. Department of Energy headquarters in downtown Washington gathered

CNNCNN

The agreement quickly collapsed after President Donald Trump wrote on social media that it was subject to a new condition: Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords, and CNN reported that Trump denied the agreement allowed uranium enrichment.

Image from 20 Minuten
20 Minuten20 Minuten

CNN said a knowledgeable source described Trump as already angry about the disclosure of the deal, which Ray had not told him his plan to announce, and that Trump’s discontent intensified after criticism from experts and conservative media including Fox News and The Wall Street Journal.

The Council on Foreign Relations said the deal’s fate is unclear after Trump conditioned approval of the agreement on Saudi Arabia signing the Abraham Accords, and it noted that the reported terms would permit Saudi Arabia to build nuclear power plants on its soil using U.S. technology.

The Council on Foreign Relations also said the fate is unclear because an official text of the agreement has not been released yet, even as it described leaked portions as allowing U.S. help develop Saudi Arabia’s nuclear program over thirty years.

White House and critics

CNN reported that White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement that the civil nuclear deal “is conditioned on the kingdom’s joining the Abraham Accords,” while Energy Department spokesman Ben Dittrich said in a statement that “These are false news.”

CNN also said White House anger grew as questions about the deal dominated the Thursday press conference, and White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt noted that Trump was the “last dealmaker” when asked why the new condition was not included in the Wednesday announcement.

Image from Aajil
AajilAajil

The Hill reported that Trump pushed back on a CNN report by saying “nobody got out ahead” of him, and he said from the Oval Office that “they have to be a member of the Abraham Accords.”

ABC News reported that U.S. officials said the deal presents the possibility that uranium enrichment could eventually happen on Saudi Arabian soil while omitting a requirement for expanded oversight, and it quoted Richard Nephew saying, “It’s just notable to me that we’re making contingent Saudi enrichment ... on recognition of a relationship with Israel.”

ABC News also said Trump wrote that the deal with Saudi Arabia “will be approved, but is totally subject to Saudi Arabia joining the very respected and successful Abraham Accords,” while sources told ABC News that those claims were not elements of the signed agreement.

What’s at stake next

The Council on Foreign Relations said the reported deal would include safeguards against enrichment and nuclear fuel reprocessing, but it also emphasized that the current deal has no requirement for the Additional Protocol that previous negotiations required.

Steven Cook, a senior fellow for Middle East and Africa studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote that Trump’s demand has left the deal “in a state of diplomatic suspension”.

Al JazeeraAl Jazeera

DW reported that the agreement does not include the “gold standard” that bars Saudi from enriching uranium and reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, and it also said it does not include the Additional Protocol that would impose broader international oversight.

Al Jazeera said the deal must first be submitted to the U.S. Congress for review, but Trump’s new condition of Saudi-Israeli normalisation has complicated the path forward and left it unclear when, or whether, the deal will be put before Congress.

Al Jazeera also said Steven Cook wrote that Trump’s demand has left the deal “in a state of diplomatic suspension,” and it described Saudi Arabia’s long insistence that it will not recognize Israel until there is a clear path for Palestinian statehood.

Jefferson City News Tribune reported that Trump said the agreement “will be approved, but is totally subject to Saudi Arabia joining the very respected and successful Abraham Accords,” and it warned that the timing of finalization was surprising given the U.S. is engaged in an active military conflict with Iran designed to destroy Tehran’s nuclear program.