New York Post, on Iran, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Rubio blasts Iran's 'outrageous and ridiculous' demands — casting doubt on diplomatic breakthrough

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

WASHINGTON — , casting doubt on the chances of a breakthrough any time soon. “I wouldn’t say we’re on the verge of a breakthrough,” Rubio bluntly told reporters on Sunday. “The President would always prefer to solve this and every problem diplomatically. Sometimes that’s not possible, unfortunately.” 3 Secretary of State Marco Rubio called Iran’s terms “outrageous and ridiculous.”

POOL/AFP via Getty Images “Right now it hasn’t been very productive, because the Iranian demands are simply not just unacceptable but, in some cases, outrageous and ridiculous and really not realistic.” Rubio didn’t elaborate on what has been so outrageous about Iran’s demands . Explore More Mystery deepens in Blue Angels scandal as female officer mentored by disgraced pilot is also scrubbed Blue Angels pilot booted from elite Navy flight team for ‘failing to uphold standards’ Biden gives heartbreaking update on cancer ahead of memoir release Iran previously said the US had to meet it seven demands, which include lifting the Navy blockade and paying reparations, before it will reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Rubio’s comments about the negotiations struck a different tone from President Trump’s assessment to CNN on Sunday. Trump said he didn’t believe new military campaign would be necessary so long as negotiations remained productive. “It depends on whether or not they sign a very strong agreement,” Trump told CNN in an interview published Sunday. “The answer is highly unlikely it’s going to be necessary. They’re a failing nation.” The president was widely reported to be contemplating a resumption of strikes on Iran after the midterm elections.

The two sides have continued to negotiate through mediators, led by Qatar. President Trump is set to meet with Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani Monday in the White House. 3 Iran has been defiant in the face of the blockade, military strikes, and other forms of pressure President Trump has . ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH/EPA/Shutterstock The remarks from America’s top diplomat , including missile launchers and defenses on Qeshm Island in the beleaguered Strait of Hormuz.

“If there’s a clear and present threat to shipping or to our forces in the region, we have a right to defend ourselves,” Rubio stressed. Meanwhile, US Central Command announced on Saturday the formation of a 20-member team to ramp up the blockade against Iranian ports and vessels, something Trump appeared to call Task Force Iron Gate. “Task Force Iron Gate is in full force and effect in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Coupled with history’s greatest Naval Blockade, very little gets into, or out of, Iran!”

Trump declared on Truth Social. 3 The US has maintained a blockade on Iranian ships and vessels over recent months. CENTCOM / SWNS Iranian hardliners had cheered the Democrats’ blue tsunami in the midterm elections, attributing it to a political consequence for the war in Iran. After the electoral shellacking, Vice President JD Vance blamed the massive defeat on backlash over the war. “A lot of people didn’t like his comments, but not me,” Trump remarked to reporters late Sunday about Vance’s remarks.

“He was right. Other than one thing. He should have made one other statement, which I think is very important. If you had it to do again, would you do it again? The answer is yes,” Trump said. Rubio has defended Trump’s decision to take military action against Iran. “It would have been very easy to do what multiple presidents before him have done, which is ignore the Iran thing, leave it for the next guy,” Rubio said at Mar-a-Lago late last week.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article presents the war as Trump's decision alone and never says the US and Israel launched it together on 28 February. It also omits that Rubio has said the US moved when it did because Israel was about to strike. Without these facts, a reader of Rubio's 'ignore the Iran thing' defence believes the war was a purely American choice made against a lingering threat.

How we know

“We had president after president ignore it and allow it to linger, .”

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The New York Post reports Rubio's dismissal of Iran's demands and ends on his justification for the war with no Iranian answer, although Iran's foreign ministry had replied. Iran appears mostly through US officials' words. The paper calls Iran's government 'the regime' in its own voice, and it presents a US strike that Trump had confirmed as mere 'reports'.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “but this president wasn’t elected to ignore it, and he wasn’t elected to allow threats to linger”

    Why this matters
    The Post closes the article on Rubio's claim that Trump went to war to stop a threat being left 'to linger', and sets nothing against it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader comes away believing the war was a settled response to a lingering threat, and that the only open question is Iranian stubbornness.
    The context
    This justification is contested. Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei called the US attack in the middle of negotiations the unreasonable act. Rubio himself said earlier that the US struck when it did because an Israeli attack was coming. The article's own reporting also shows the war was rejected at the polls.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Iran of issuing “outrageous and ridiculous” demands”

    Why this matters
    The Post builds the article on Rubio, Trump and CENTCOM. It quotes them at length, while Iran appears only as a one-line list of demands and as unnamed 'hardliners'.
    The impression it gives
    The reader gets only Washington's description of Iran's position and never hears why Iran says its terms are reasonable.
    The context
    Iran's foreign ministry answered Rubio directly. It said its demand was that the US lift sanctions and stop the war before talks begin.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “imposed on the regime this year”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration the Post calls Iran's government 'the regime'.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes in a verdict on the Iranian government's legitimacy as plain description.
    The context
    Nobody in the article is quoted using the word. It is the Post's own label, where 'Iran's government' would describe the same thing.

    Show it in the article

  4. Hedges a confirmed US strike

    Minor

    “came on the heels of reports that the US struck Iranian assets”

    Why this matters
    The Post presents the US strikes on Qeshm Island only as 'reports'.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the US strike is unconfirmed.
    The context
    Trump confirmed the strikes on Iranian air defences, and Iran's Tasnim agency confirmed that a US projectile hit Qeshm Island.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article presents the war as Trump's decision alone and never says the US and Israel launched it together on 28 February. It also omits that Rubio has said the US moved when it did because Israel was about to strike. Without these facts, a reader of Rubio's 'ignore the Iran thing' defence believes the war was a purely American choice made against a lingering threat.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisTrump Told Voters Israel's Aid Would Stop. The Plan Is to Move It Into the Pentagon.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 8 NovTrump says return to war with Iran 'highly unlikely' as long as sides continue negotiations0.0
  2. 8 NovIran executes 3 men accused of links to US and Israel, protesting against regime3.0
  3. 8 NovUS military fires on commercial vessel in Gulf of Oman after it attempted to breach blockade6.0
  4. 7 NovTrump confirms fresh US strikes on Iran defenses as talks turn to nuke inspectors0.0
  5. 7 NovHow Iranians are fighting despotic Islamist regime with personal acts of defiance6.0

Everything we scored from New York Post