The Guardian, on UK Politics, 4 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

UNHCR criticises UK’s 30-year ‘earned settlement’ plans for refugees

No framing issues found.

The UN refugee agency has said a government plan to make refugees wait up to 30 years before they get permission to settle in the UK “raises significant concerns”. The strategy was unveiled earlier this week by Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, as she announced a softening of aspects of her immigration plans, but kept some of the rigorous rules drawn up by her office last year. Mahmood introduced a carve-out for care workers to allow them to apply for indefinite leave to remain after five years, but maintained rules to make those who arrived by irregular means such as small boats having to wait up to 30 years.

UNHCR, which has international responsibility for refugees, told the Guardian that the plan to increase the time people had to wait for those who arrived by irregular means was “likely to be detrimental”. UK to deploy facial recognition in biggest-ever immigration crackdown Read more Some refugees can reduce the upper limit of 30 years if they enter work or study, but there is a 10-year penalty for those who arrive on small boats or concealed in lorries rather than arriving via safe and legal routes.

The government has significantly reduced the latter, and although it has announced some legal routes, these will only be able to be accessed by a small minority seeking sanctuary here. The UNHCR welcomed the legal routes but said: “An extended qualifying period for settlement for refugees raises significant concerns, particularly when considered alongside the introduction of short-term stay arrangements and changes made last year that would preclude many from ever accessing citizenship.

“Taken together, these measures are likely to be detrimental to refugees’ sense of security, belonging and stability, and to impact their ability to contribute and become part of their new communities. “Refugees are not migrants: they have fled their countries because they cannot rely on their protection nor safely return home. For refugees, safety means more than a grant of asylum and settlement has an important role to play.” Kamena Dorling, the director of policy at Helen Bamber Foundation, also raised concerns about the 30-year rule.

She said: “We are deeply alarmed and disappointed by the government’s announcement on ‘earned settlement’. It will cause profound and lasting harm to refugees, including survivors of torture, trafficking and other forms of extreme cruelty. “The government had an opportunity to change its approach after receiving extensive evidence about the devastating consequences of this policy, but instead has doubled down on its approach that will damage the lives and futures of thousands of men, women, families and children, as well as harm wider integration and social cohesion.

She said that extending the qualifying period for settlement “is simply inhumane”. She added: “This will not deter people fleeing war, persecution, torture and violence, who are fighting for their lives and seeking safety in the UK. When legal routes are so severely limited, people will continue to take desperate measures to reach safety. It will punish people who have already endured unimaginable harm, leaving those recognised as refugees facing decades of uncertainty, insecurity and fear.”

Explore more on these topics Refugees Immigration and asylum Shabana Mahmood Home Office Migration United Nations news Share Reuse this content

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Guardian reports the UN refugee agency's and the Helen Bamber Foundation's criticism of the home secretary's plan to make refugees who arrive by irregular routes wait up to 30 years to settle. It attributes every criticism and describes refugees in neutral terms.

What it gets right

  • “those who arrived by irregular means such as small boats”

    The Guardian describes how people arrived in neutral terms, not as "illegal migrants", and does not let the government's framing into its own voice.

  • “The UN refugee agency has said”

    The opening attributes the concern to the UNHCR, and the headline keeps that attribution with "UNHCR criticises".

  • “these will only be able to be accessed by a small minority seeking sanctuary here”

    The Guardian gives the reader the fact that legal routes are narrow, which explains why people arrive by irregular means, and calls those people sanctuary seekers.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 4 NovPalestine Action activists used similar tactics to the suffragettes, court told3.0
  2. 4 NovKemi Badenoch says Africans should apologise for slavery. She should read a history book3.0
  3. 4 NovThese cruel new plans to ‘stop the boats’ show the government completely misunderstands refugees like me0.0
  4. 4 NovUK apologises to Ukrainian child refugees who were told to study Russian0.0
  5. 4 NovHouses of Parliament at risk of ‘Notre Dame-style fire’ as renovation costs rise0.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian