Press TV · Iran · 26 Sept 2026

The headline editorialises, and the civilian cost of sanctions is ignored.

2.4
/ 10 · article score
scored on 7 of 11 measures

The double standard

The article presents Iranian government claims as established fact while applying no equivalent scrutiny to any countervailing account, treating one side's contested narrative as the authoritative record of events.

How it builds, in US-Israeli war framing and ceasefire account

  1. Iranian claim stated as documented fact, no attribution

    The United States and the Israeli regime waged their illegal war of aggression against Iran on February 28.

    Contested Iranian characterisation presented as plain fact with no sourcing

  2. US violation stated as fact, no US response sought

    However, Washington violated all provisions of the understanding, prompting Iran to deliver a firm response.

    Iranian allegation of US breach stated as established fact with no US voice

  3. Highly contested US conduct stated as fact, no attribution

    The US also resumed its aerial assaults on Iran and imposed a naval blockade of the country in violation of the war-ending deal.

    Disputed Iranian claim about US military conduct presented as plain reportorial fact

  4. US measures labelled unlawful by article, not by source

    The unlawful US measures prompted Iran to declare the Strait of Hormuz closed to all traffic.

    Legal characterisation adopted from Iranian position without attribution

The same decision, both sides

Attribution of contested characterisation of the conflict

Iran's characterisation of the conflict as an illegal US-Israeli war of aggression is stated in the article's own narrative voice, not attributed to Iran.

The United States and the Israeli regime waged their illegal war of aggression against Iran on February 28.

No US or Israeli characterisation of the same events is reported, sought, or attributed anywhere in the article.

We have no trust in the American side and do not know on what basis an understanding can be reached with it

Attribution of legal judgement on state conduct

Iran's closure of the Strait is described in the article's own voice as a response to unlawful US measures, adopting Iran's legal framing without attribution.

The unlawful US measures prompted Iran to declare the Strait of Hormuz closed to all traffic.

Iran's own closure of the Strait, which the article elsewhere notes is contested, is never subjected to any legal characterisation or independent scrutiny.

Addressing the Strait of Hormuz, the Iranian president rejected accusations that Tehran was responsible for disrupting maritime traffic

What a reader is left with. A reader is left believing that the US and Israel launched an illegal war of aggression against Iran, that Iran bravely resisted and forced a ceasefire, and that the US then violated the peace deal, because the article states all of this in its own narrative voice rather than attributing it to the Iranian government whose account it is.

Every highlight is a quote the model flagged. Tap one — or a metric below — to see what it measures and why it scored the way it did.

Aggressor framingHeadline analysisSanctions framing

Pezeshkian: Iran ‘no longer’ trusts US after being attacked twice during talks

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Tehran has lost faith in negotiating with the United States after earlier rounds of talks were disrupted by military strikes and sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

In an interview with the Qatar-based broadcaster Al Jazeera aired on Saturday, Pezeshkian said Iran sees no clear basis for reaching an understanding with Washington.

“We have no trust in the American side and do not know on what basis an understanding can be reached with it,” he argued.

The Iranian president's remarks came after he and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi attended the United Nations General Assembly in New York this week and presented a proposal aimed at ending the US-Israeli war against Iran and reopening the Strait of Hormuz within seven days.

Pezeshkian said Qatar and Pakistan are acting as intermediaries, relaying Iran's messages to Washington. He noted that the talks rest on the memorandum of understanding previously reached between the two sides in June. He emphasized that Washington must make clear its stance on that agreement, which expired last month.

The United States and the Israeli regime waged their illegal war of aggression against Iran on February 28. However, forty days later, on April 8, the enemies were forced to accept a ceasefire amid Iran’s brave resistance and successful retaliatory operations.

On June 17, Tehran and Washington signed the 14-point Islamabad MoU, which called for an end to hostilities, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and further negotiations toward a final agreement.

However, Washington violated all provisions of the understanding, prompting Iran to deliver a firm response.

Hormuz Strait closure ‘a natural response’

Addressing the Strait of Hormuz, the Iranian president rejected accusations that Tehran was responsible for disrupting maritime traffic, saying the closure of the strategic waterway was a consequence of US actions against Iran.

The US “closed the routes before us,” he said, describing the closure as “a natural response when routes are cut off to Iran.”

Pezeshkian added that the crisis could be settled through diplomacy rather than force and reiterated that commercial shipping could resume if negotiations ended the war.

Calling the US the aggressor in the war, he emphasized that Iran "has not attacked any country in 200 years". He said the US and Israel had pulled regional nations into the war in the belief that the Iranian system "would collapse within days".

“We withstood the American and Israeli attacks, and we will continue to stand firm,” he said, adding that neither the killing of Iranian commanders nor economic pressure had caused Iranians to retreat.

Pezeshkian said Israel and the United States had carried out attacks on Iran from the airspace of Muslim countries, explaining that Tehran targets bases used by US forces in the region because attacks against Iran are launched from those facilities.

He stressed that Iran seeks nothing beyond the framework of international law and responds only when other parties violate its rules.

The Iranian president also linked the sanctions imposed on Iran to tactics used by Israel in its genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza.

“Those who deny Iranians medicine and raw materials are the same people who cut off food and water from Gaza,” he said, warning that anyone who believes Iran can be targeted through sanctions has “miscalculated”.

Iran has restricted transit through the Strait of Hormuz since the early days of the US-Israeli war of aggression that began on February 28 and came to a halt under a ceasefire in early April amid the Islamic Republic’s brave resistance and successful retaliatory operations.

Article 5 of the Islamabad MoU places responsibility for reopening and managing the strait squarely in Iran’s hands.

However, the US attempted to undermine Iran’s sovereignty over the vital global energy chokepoint by establishing an unsafe corridor near the Omani shores. The US also resumed its aerial assaults on Iran and imposed a naval blockade of the country in violation of the war-ending deal.

The unlawful US measures prompted Iran to declare the Strait of Hormuz closed to all traffic.

The Islamic Republic has stressed that the reopening of the critical waterway depends on US compliance with its obligations under the MoU.

No need for a regional policeman

Pezeshkian further stressed that regional security should be ensured through cooperation among the countries of the region, saying, “We do not need a regional policeman.”

He added that the US and Israel are seeking to create divisions among Muslim countries to control the region’s resources, noting that Saudi Arabia could play a role in promoting unity across the Muslim world.

On Yemen, Pezeshkian rejected any link between Iran and the actions of the Houthis, saying Tehran stands in solidarity with “everyone subjected to injustice.”

He urged the Houthis and Saudi Arabia to settle their differences through dialogue, stressing that “a brother should not fight his brother,” and offered Iran’s assistance in resolving the dispute.

“We will not be warmongers,” the Iranian president said.

Enemies seek to stir disagreements among Iranians

Turning to domestic issues, Pezeshkian said Iran’s “enemies” are seeking to sow discord among Iranian officials while the country is experiencing “unprecedented unity and cohesion.”

He noted that he had met twice with Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, including once for a seven-hour meeting during which they discussed key issues. Pezeshkian also pledged to address “accumulated imbalances in Iran’s internal conditions.”

He said the United States and Israel sought to prevent Iran from becoming self-reliant, but stressed, “We will invest in our people.”

Read the original article ↗