HuffPost UK, on UK Politics, 4 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Ed Miliband Slams Tony Blair For Britain's Role In The Slave Trade

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Ed Miliband has criticised Tony Blair’s approach to Britain’s role in the slave trade. The foreign secretary accused the former prime minister of taking a “sorry, not sorry” approach by not making a full apology on behalf of the UK when he was in No.10. Miliband all-but confirmed that Andy Burnham will apologise – but insisted it would not cost the government “a penny more” amid calls from African and Caribbean countries for reparations.

Burnham is set to hold talks at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Antigua over what form the apology will take. Speaking in 2006 when he was still PM, Blair spoke of his “deep sorrow and regret” for Britain’s involvement in the slave trade. Speaking to the BBC’s Newscast podcast, Miliband – who is attending the summit alongside the PM – accused previous governments of having had a tendency to “sweep under the carpet” the issue of slavery.

He said Blair “did sort of do a kind of sorry not sorry situation”, adding: “He sort of, yeah, he kind of expressed sorrow, but and then said sorry, and then it was walked back by No 10.” Asked whether the government might reach the point of issuing a formal apology by the time it hosts the G20 leaders’ summit in Manchester next November, he said: “Broadly speaking, yes.” When asked whether the new approach could end up costing UK taxpayers a penny more, Miliband said: “No.

“I mean, not… no. And that’s – for us, that’s never been what it’s about,” the foreign secretary said. “ And that’s why it’s been important that you know, and I did have this conversation with our partners in advance. I said, ‘look, we are going to say we are willing to say that we’re open to an apology, but we’re not going to shift our position on reparations’. “It’s not for us. It’s not the right answer. It’s not practical. It’s not feasible for us, but there are things we can work on co-operatively.”

He added: “And you know there’s been a lot of acceptance of that, and I mean people have been honestly a bit bruised by the past, what happened in the past, the sense that we just really just wanted to sweep this issue under the carpet and not confront it. “My sense is there’s a bit of a sigh of relief that OK well at least you know at least there’s a sense of we’ve got a shared interest now in moving the Commonwealth on.” Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy.

Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Read the original article on huffingtonpost.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

HuffPost UK reports Ed Miliband's criticism of Tony Blair's 2006 statement on the slave trade and attributes the claims to Miliband throughout. The headline shortens Miliband's complaint about the lack of a full apology into a flat 'not apologising', which the body itself qualifies by reporting Blair's 'deep sorrow and regret'.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “For Not Apologising”

    Why this matters
    The headline says Miliband attacked Blair for 'Not Apologising', as if Blair offered no apology at all.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that Blair made no apology or expression of regret for Britain's role in the slave trade.
    The context
    The body says Miliband's complaint was about the lack of a full apology. It reports that Blair spoke of 'deep sorrow and regret' in 2006. Miliband himself says Blair 'then said sorry' before No 10 walked it back.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“by not making a full apology on behalf of the UK”
    • Elsewhere in the article“his “deep sorrow and regret” for Britain’s involvement”
    • Elsewhere in the article“and then said sorry, and then it was walked back by No 10”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Blair spoke of his “deep sorrow and regret” for Britain’s involvement in the slave trade”

    The article gives Blair's actual 2006 words, so readers can judge Miliband's 'sorry not sorry' charge for themselves rather than taking it on his word.

  • “insisted it would not cost the government “a penny more” amid calls from African and Caribbean countries for reparations”

    It attributes the no-cost claim to Miliband as his insistence and sets it against the reparations demands from African and Caribbean countries, rather than stating it as settled.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from HuffPost UK

  1. 3 Nov'With What Money?': Britons Respond To Government Stockpiling Advice0.0
  2. 3 Nov'Do You Want To Apologise?' BBC Presenter Skewers Top Tory Over His Party's Immigration Record3.0
  3. 2 NovShabana Mahmood U-Turns On Immigration Crackdown After Labour Backlash3.0
  4. 2 Nov'Air Miles Andy': Burnham Slammed After His Plane To Caribbean Picks Him Up In Manchester3.0
  5. 2 NovSorry, Not Sorry: Is Andy Burnham About To Apologise For Britain's Role In The Slave Trade?6.0

Everything we scored from HuffPost UK