New York Post, on Iran, 22 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu orders IDF, Mossad to pursue overthrow of

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Wednesday that he had directed the Israel Defense Forces, Mossad and other security branches to pursue the overthrow of the Iranian regime, calling it the only way to eliminate the nuclear threat from Tehran.

“There is only one way to remove this threat once and for all: overthrow the regime in Iran. And that is my directive to the IDF, the Mossad and the security branches,” Netanyahu told an IDF officer course graduation ceremony.

“As long as they are here, as long as they strive to acquire horrific weapons, the State of Israel faces an existential threat,” Netanyahu said. “And our duty, the duty of all of us, is to save the nation.”

That prompted the joint Israeli-U.S. Operation Roaring Lion, he said, whose opening strike killed Ali Khamenei.

The premier accused Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who succeeded his father after Ali Khamenei was killed in an Israeli strike on Feb. 28, of following in his father’s footsteps. “He has pulled the safety pin, and Iran is attempting once again to develop the bombs of death,” Netanyahu said.

Netanyahu said U.S. President Donald Trump also supported toppling the Iranian regime, quoting him as saying, “We are ready to finish the job,” but would do so only with Israel.

“We will eliminate the head of the octopus, and we will also finally sever its arms, the remainder of its arms, we will eliminate Hamas and eliminate Hezbollah,” Netanyahu said. “And I can tell you that many of our neighbors hope for this, in Lebanon, in Gaza, and certainly in Iran. In Iran, they hope for Israel’s victory.”

Addressing the graduating officers, Netanyahu called overthrowing the Iranian regime “now also your mission” and urged them “to eliminate the Axis of Evil once and for all.”

Also speaking at the graduation ceremony, if the Islamic Republic launches an attack on the Jewish state.

Katz said Tehran and its proxies are seeking to carry out terror attacks to influence the outcome of the Oct. 27 Knesset elections.

“The Iranian regime is at its weakest point ever, and we identify that this weakness could lead it to take the most extreme steps, including against the State of Israel,” the defense minister said.

“Our message to the Iranian regime is clear,” Katz continued. “We identify your attempts, we are prepared to thwart them, and ready to strike you with full force.”

Anyone who attacks Israel “before the elections or after them,” Katz said, “will pay the heaviest price.”

Trump also touted the strikes on Iran in remarks shared on Wednesday by the White House’s Rapid Response 47 account.

“I think it’s one of the greatest things that we’ve done—,” he said. “It took a lot of courage to do it because no other president was willing to do it.”

Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Trump told NewsNation correspondent Libbey Dean that negotiations were continuing “a little bit.”

Pressed further, he said, “We are not negotiating with [Iran]. We are gonna have something one way or the other. It’ll happen fairly soon.”

“Most people seem to think it’s after the election; we’re gonna see what happens,” he added.

Read the original article on nypost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The New York Post reports Netanyahu's claim that Iran has resumed its nuclear programme, and Trump's claim that the strikes stopped an Iranian bomb, with nothing set against either claim. No Iranian voice and no IAEA or US intelligence assessment appears anywhere in the piece. Its headline also uses 'Iranian regime' in the outlet's own voice.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “Netanyahu said Iran had resumed its nuclear program after Operation Rising Lion, seeking to bury the project deep beneath a mountain.”

    Why this matters
    The Post reports Netanyahu's claim that Iran resumed its nuclear programme and is hiding it under a mountain. It then moves straight on to further Israeli claims with no response, inspection finding or intelligence assessment.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Iran is secretly rebuilding a nuclear weapons project and that this is the reason for the strikes and the push for regime change.
    The context
    Other reporting on the same speech notes that there was no evidence before the June 2025 war or the current war that Iran had decided to pursue nuclear weapons, and that this was the consensus of US intelligence agencies. The article carries no IAEA finding and no Iranian response.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “we’ve stopped Iran from having a nuclear weapon”

    Why this matters
    The Post gives Trump's claim, which takes for granted that Iran was about to have a nuclear weapon, as the near-final word on the strikes. Nothing comes after it to test that premise.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing the strikes stopped an Iranian bomb that was otherwise on its way.
    The context
    The premise that Iran had decided to build a weapon is contested. Reporting on the same day cites the US intelligence consensus that there was no evidence Tehran had made that decision.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz warned that “Iran will burn””

    Why this matters
    Netanyahu, Katz and Trump fill every paragraph, and Katz's threat that 'Iran will burn' runs at length. Iran's government never speaks in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only Israeli and US officials on a directive aimed at another country's government and does not learn how Iran responded.
    The context
    The article contains no Iranian official, foreign ministry statement or response of any kind to an openly declared aim of overthrowing its government.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “ministry”.

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iranian regime”

    Why this matters
    The Post's headline calls Iran's government the 'Iranian regime' in its own voice, with no quotation marks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Netanyahu's word for Iran's government as the neutral description.
    The context
    'Regime' is Netanyahu's and Katz's term, quoted in S2 and S22. In the outlet's voice the neutral term is Iran's government.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“overthrow the regime in Iran”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from New York Post

  1. 26 OctIsraeli PM Netanyahu and challenger Gadi Eisenkot have very different views on how to end the Iran war3.0
  2. 26 OctIran's 'diabolical regime' is rebuilding nuclear sites right under everyone's noses, ex-general warns6.0
  3. 26 OctDelegations meet in Iran with Middle East on edge over potential for renewed fighting3.0
  4. 21 OctIran is purposely tanking peace talks to hurt Trump at the polls, regime officials admit6.0

Everything we scored from New York Post

See how 7 outlets covered this story