Daily Express, on UK Politics, 28 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Make or break Budget could be the starting gun for next General Election

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

Today’s Budget comes on the 101st day of Andy Burnham’s fledgling premiership. But what his Chancellor, John Healey, says at the despatch box at around 12.30pm this afternoon could make or break the rest of the Prime Minister’s time inside No. 10. With soaring inflation and an escalating cost of living squeeze, Britain’s hard-pressed families are desperate for genuine relief. Household energy bills continue to climb, with Ofgem price cap increases threatening to swallow up modest relief measures like the electricity VAT cut.

It is time to put money back into voters’ pockets. , there’s a “red light flashing” on the dashboard, and it can only mean one thing - tax rises. Burnham and Healey are trapped between a rock and a very hard place. To quote a former Labour Treasury man, Liam Byrne, “there is no money”. The nation’s wallet is threadbare, and the economy is spluttering along at best.

Funds are desperately needed to boost our defences to protect the UK from increased global threats, notably Vladimir Putin and Iran, while investment in our ailing social care system is critical. Jobs are becoming scarcer by the day, . One simple solution would be to .

But Burnham and Healey . Instead, they are likely to pull the default tax hike lever to bail them out of a tight spot. We’re unlikely to get hikes on the scale of Rachel Reeves’ two mega-tax bombs in 2024 and 2025. But it will be painful, nonetheless, with the cost of living crisis continuing to bite hard. It could even get worse this winter with energy prices set to jump again and no end in sight to the Middle East crisis.

Healey faces significant financial headwinds – government debt has exceeded £3 trillion, and the Treasury spent £10.9 billion servicing the interest in September alone. Meanwhile, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has said the Chancellor faces a £35 billion shortfall to maintain existing spending policies and to boost defence funding. Given , middle and high earners are likely to bear the brunt of any new measures.

So, what does this mean going forward - especially as rumours continue to swirl about a snap general election? Labour’s poll ratings have bounced since Burnham became Prime Minister in the summer. The Party is polling at around 28%, six or seven points ahead of Reform UK and the Conservatives. This has triggered expectations that the PM is about to pull the trigger and call a national vote, either later this year or next spring. The latter is more likely, but budgets can negatively impact Governments, especially if taxes go up.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Burnham had already ruled out an early general election, including on ITV's Good Morning Britain on the Monday before the Budget. The article says the PM is expected to call an election and that spring is more likely, so a reader believes a snap election is on the cards when the Prime Minister had publicly ruled it out.

Combined with Burnham’s threats to ditch the pensions Triple Lock and , then the polls may look very different come March and April, the very moment he could trigger an election. This is also when some of these budgetary measures take hold, when the new financial year kicks in. For these reasons alone, the sixty-or-so minutes the Chancellor spends on his feet in the House of Commons may well determine the future of how this country is governed.

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

The Express runs this pre-Budget piece as news, but in its own voice it calls the welfare budget bloated and out of control, says relief for households is unlikely, and says Burnham is threatening to take Britain back into the EU, with no attribution and nothing to back these claims. It never tells readers that the Chancellor had already trailed energy bill and fuel duty relief, or that Burnham had publicly ruled out an early election. The only political voice it carries is the Conservative leader's.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “slash the UK’s bloated welfare budget, with spending on benefits totally out of control”

    Why this matters
    The words "bloated" and "totally out of control" give the Conservative case against welfare spending as the Express's own finding, with no figure and no source.
    The impression it gives
    That benefit spending is out of control as a matter of fact, and that cutting it is a simple fix.
    The context
    This is a contested political position. The Conservative leader set out the same line in her own column for the Express that morning. The article gives no welfare figure to support it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Conservatives argue that welfare spending should be cut to fund defence and other priorities; Labour has not adopted that approach.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    Burnham had already ruled out an early general election, including on ITV's Good Morning Britain on the Monday before the Budget. The article says the PM is expected to call an election and that spring is more likely, so a reader believes a snap election is on the cards when the Prime Minister had publicly ruled it out.

    Show where it belongs

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “All the indications are that this is unlikely to happen.”

    Why this matters
    The sentence tells readers in the outlet's own voice that there will be no money put back in their pockets, and it cites no indication.
    The impression it gives
    That the Budget is expected to offer households no real relief.
    The context
    Same-morning coverage reports that Healey had promised to use the Budget to cut energy bills and was expected to freeze fuel duty, framed as giving households breathing space. The article mentions none of this.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “march Britain back into the EU”

    Why this matters
    The phrase states as fact that Burnham is threatening to take Britain back into the EU.
    The impression it gives
    That the Prime Minister has proposed rejoining the EU.
    The context
    Other coverage reports Burnham speaking of a "pragmatic" approach to the relationship with the EU. Rejoining is Farage's framing of a future election, not something the material shows Burnham proposing.

    Show it in the article

  5. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “won’t do this as a point of principle as the Labour Party continues to lurch to the Left”

    Why this matters
    The outlet states Labour's motive as its own fact and calls its direction a "lurch".
    The impression it gives
    That Labour is refusing cuts out of ideology and swerving left.
    The context
    The article quotes no minister and gives no policy to show this motive or shift.

    Show it in the article

    “Labour’s obsession with penalising wealth”

    Why this matters
    The words "obsession" and "penalising" give Labour a motive in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    That Labour's tax choices come from hostility to wealth.
    The context
    No Labour figure is quoted, and the article has not yet seen any Budget measure.

    Show it in the article

    “the education system is in tatters, and businesses and High Streets across the country are dying”

    Why this matters
    The outlet passes sweeping verdicts on schools and businesses with no figures.
    The impression it gives
    That these sectors are collapsing as an established fact.
    The context
    The article offers no data on schools, business closures or high streets.

    Show it in the article

  6. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “As Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has warned”

    Why this matters
    The only party leader quoted is the Conservative leader, whose warning is used to back the article's prediction of tax rises.
    The impression it gives
    That the Budget's likely content is as the opposition describes it.
    The context
    The Chancellor had set out his own aims for the Budget, and none of them appear in the article.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 28 OctUK households face £465 energy bills increase in January but Budget set to help6.0
  2. 28 OctMartin Lewis gives one-word verdict on Budget after meeting John Healey3.0
  3. 28 OctThis bogus slavery reparations debate is really about this one thing only6.0
  4. 28 OctA new £47bn power station will make energy bills more expensive - 'terrible deal!'3.0
  5. 28 OctAndy Burnham and John Healey have 'bottled' making the tough decisions0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Express