The i Paper, on UK Politics, 12 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

How students with parents on minimum wage will miss out on maintenance grants

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

We do not republish articles from The i Paper. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.

Read the original article on inews.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The i Paper reports analysis showing that around 90 per cent of English students will not qualify for the returning maintenance grants. It attributes the estimates, the criticism and the government's defence to named sources and compares the grants with other UK nations. The one weakness is a minor one: two earnings figures rest on different working hours without saying so, which makes a single minimum wage household look closer to the cut-off than the article's own other figure suggests.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “A full-time working parent on the minimum wage is paid more than £26,000 a year – already putting them near the threshold.”

    Why this matters
    The i Paper gives one minimum wage parent's pay as "more than £26,000 a year" without stating the hours, and says this puts them "near the threshold".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that a household with one parent on the minimum wage sits close to the £30,000 cut-off and is at risk of missing out.
    The context
    The sentence before works on 35 hours a week and gives two parents £46,300 combined. On that basis one parent earns about £23,150, below the £25,000 level that gets the full grant. The two sentences use different hours, so the article's own figures disagree, and the higher one makes the single earner look nearer the cut-off.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Two parents working 35 hours a week on the minimum wage would have a combined income of £46,300”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Those with household incomes of up to £25,000 will get £1,000”

What it gets right

  • “according to estimates by the Centre for Economics and Business Research for The i Paper”

    It names who produced the eligibility estimates and says the outlet commissioned them, so the reader knows the source of the central figure.

  • “A Department for Education spokesperson said they set the eligibility threshold at £30,000 so that maintenance grants go to the students most in need.”

    It reports the government's justification as the department's claim, not as fact, after setting out the figures that test it.

  • “students from families with incomes of up to £42,620 were eligible for grants, which tapered to a maximum of £3,387 a year”

    It gives the old scheme's threshold and amounts, so the reader can compare the new grants against concrete figures and not only against critics' words.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The i Paper

  1. 12 NovUK on cusp of historic Brexit deal as hopes grow last obstacle can be overcome0.0
  2. 12 NovWhy Burnham’s Cabinet can’t agree on Britain’s future in Europe0.0
  3. 12 NovThe young people at risk of being criminalised by a benefits crackdown3.0
  4. 12 NovThe i Paper’s life-saving Killer Kitchens campaign wins Media Freedom Award0.0
  5. 12 NovLeaseholders to get cheaper bills within months in crackdown on service charges3.0

Everything we scored from The i Paper