Tehran Times, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran will not resume talks until its conditions are met: top security official

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

TEHRAN — Major General Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, has stressed that Iran will neither resume negotiations nor reopen the Strait of Hormuz until its seven conditions are met, warning that communications cables, regional data centers and artificial intelligence facilities could be targeted if hostilities resume. In an interview with Mehr News Agency, Rezaei, who represents the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, addressed recent regional developments and Iran’s position, emphasizing that any action against the country would carry a cost.

“If diplomacy can establish this understanding, we prefer diplomacy,” he said. “But if the war continues, Iran has the necessary capabilities to sustain its response.” Rezaei noted that Iran had not deployed all its capabilities during previous stages of the conflict. The country had introduced additional capabilities in proportion to the intensity of the fighting, he said, adding that Iran was prepared for the next stage. Prolonged conflict threatens energy stability Warning of the broader consequences of continued hostilities, Rezaei said the current situation would have far-reaching strategic implications, including prolonged instability in global energy markets.

“Energy markets will not return to calm for the next three years,” he said. He also argued that the continuation of the conflict had shifted regional dynamics in Iran’s favor, pointing to a rapid reassessment of relations with Tehran by Persian Gulf states. According to Rezaei, these countries have come to recognize that the US military is unable to protect even its own bases, despite their expectations that Washington would defend their territories.

US regional assets could be targeted Rezaei warned that the United States maintains valuable assets across the region that could come under attack if a new war breaks out. “Cables, data centers and artificial intelligence facilities could also be within range if war resumes,” he said, adding that Iran had a broader plan prepared for a renewed confrontation. His remarks signaled that a potential escalation could extend beyond conventional military targets to include digital and communications infrastructure.

Strait of Hormuz: Security, not revenue, is the priority Turning to the Strait of Hormuz, Rezaei said the strategic waterway was under Iran’s control and that Tehran was managing it. “Smuggling exists everywhere in the world, but the Strait of Hormuz is under Iran’s control, and we manage it,” he said. Rezaei emphasized that Iran’s management of the strait was a strategic national asset and that the issue went well beyond collecting transit fees.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Anadolu reported that Rezaei said Iran had targeted five vessels belonging to alleged smugglers every night for two to three months. The Tehran Times quotes him only saying smuggling "exists everywhere". Its reader does not learn that Iran is using force against shipping in the strait.

How we know

“The main issue is security,” he said, adding that charges could also be levied to cover security, insurance and environmental costs. However, he stressed that the strategic importance of managing the waterway far exceeded any revenue it might generate. Seven conditions must be met before talks resume Rezaei said Iran would not return to the previous diplomatic process but would not abandon diplomacy altogether. According to Rezaei, Iran has conveyed seven new conditions through mediators.

He said the country would not reopen the Strait of Hormuz or return to negotiations until those conditions had been implemented. He outlined a proposed sequence for a new agreement, saying that its structure would itself contain guarantees for compliance. “First, the commitments must be implemented. Then Iran will decide to reopen the strait, followed by the resumption of maritime traffic under new arrangements agreed upon with Oman,” he said.

Rezaei stressed that Iran was no longer interested in an agreement whose only safeguard was the other side’s political goodwill. Iran will not relinquish its leverage prematurely Rezaei said a path remained open to reopening the Strait of Hormuz and continuing diplomacy if Washington honored its commitments. “Iran will not first give up the leverage that brought the other side to the negotiating table and then wait to see whether its promises are fulfilled,” he said.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Anadolu reported that Rezaei acknowledged Iran would suffer from a prolonged blockade. The Tehran Times gives only his statements of strength and leverage, so its reader sees none of the costs he himself admitted.

How we know

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Tehran Times reports an interview with Mohsen Rezaei and attributes his threats, conditions and claims to him throughout, including in the headline. One sentence about CENTCOM and Emirati forces is cut off, so a reader cannot tell who is accused of what. The article also leaves out two things other outlets reported him saying: that Iran was striking alleged smugglers' vessels nightly, and that Iran would suffer from a prolonged blockade.

  1. Truncated allegation

    Minor

    “Command (CENTCOM) of leading these operations and said Emirati military forces were also being used.”

    Why this matters
    The sentence begins mid-phrase. It accuses US Central Command of "leading these operations" and says Emirati forces "were also being used". It never says who makes the accusation or what the operations are.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with an allegation against CENTCOM and the Emirati military without a clear speaker. The reader also cannot tell whether "these operations" means the smuggling just mentioned or something else.
    The context
    The article never shows the accusing verb or the operations being referred to, so the claim cannot be weighed or placed in context.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “accused”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Anadolu reported that Rezaei said Iran had targeted five vessels belonging to alleged smugglers every night for two to three months. The Tehran Times quotes him only saying smuggling "exists everywhere". Its reader does not learn that Iran is using force against shipping in the strait.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Anadolu reported that Rezaei acknowledged Iran would suffer from a prolonged blockade. The Tehran Times gives only his statements of strength and leverage, so its reader sees none of the costs he himself admitted.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Iran will not resume talks until its conditions are met: top security official”

    The headline keeps the attribution to the official who made the statement, and matches the body.

  • “According to Rezaei, these countries have come to recognize that the US military is unable to protect even its own bases”

    A contested claim about Gulf states' views and US capability is clearly marked as Rezaei's, not stated as the outlet's fact.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 24 OctIran has sufficient forex reserves to fund imports through end of Trump term, CBI chief says0.0
  2. 23 OctBeijing’s priority is peaceful coexistence between Iran and neighbors 6.0
  3. 23 OctIRGC Spokesman: US has suffered strategic defeats in war with Iran0.0
  4. 23 OctIran urges end to double standards in IAEA’s implementation of its statute3.0
  5. 23 OctIRGC Navy chief: US forces have moved 700 kilometers away from Strait of Hormuz3.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times