Tehran Times, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

IRGC Navy chief: from Strait of Hormuz

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

TEHRAN— The commander of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy says US forces have moved 600 to 700 kilometers away from the Strait of Hormuz, attributing a retreat from the strategic waterway to the 'sacrifices of Iranian personnel killed in the line of duty.' Brigadier General Ali Ozmaei made the remarks during visits to the families of Iranian personnel killed in the Ramadan War and in operations related to the Strait of Hormuz.

He met the families of martyrs Ghodrat Zarangari, Abbas Eslami, Abdolreza Golzari and Javad Raoufi-Moqaddam at their homes in Bandar Abbas, conveying the message and greetings of Iran’s commander-in-chief. During the meetings, Ozmaei paid tribute to those killed in the conflict and stressed the importance of continuing their path. He said the sacrifices of those killed in the Strait of Hormuz had played a decisive role in confronting the United States, describing their actions as a blow to Washington’s regional presence. ‘The US has no place in the Strait of Hormuz’ Referring to the history of foreign powers’ presence in the waterway, Ozmaei said the Strait of Hormuz had once been under the influence of powers including Britain, the United States and Portugal.

He argued that the current regional situation was markedly different, asserting that US forces had withdrawn farther from the strait. “Today, the Americans are not present in the Persian Gulf and have moved 600 to 700 kilometers away from the Strait of Hormuz,” he said, adding that US vessels were no longer visible in the area. Ozmaei declared that the United States no longer had a place in the strategic waterway, linking Iran’s strengthened position to God's grace and the sacrifices made by those killed in the conflict.

The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the wider Indian Ocean, is one of the world’s most strategically important maritime passages and a critical route for global energy shipments. Addressing the families, the IRGC Navy commander expressed respect for their sacrifices and pledged continued support. He described the families of those killed as a source of pride, saying that serving them would remain a duty for the armed forces.

Ozmaei also reaffirmed his readiness to defend the country, saying he regarded martyrdom in the service of God as his ultimate aspiration. “If there is a war, we will be there,” he said, asking the families to pray for his martyrdom. The visits, according to the report, were intended to honor the memory of those killed and reaffirm the IRGC Navy’s commitment to their families and the continuation of their path.

Read the original article on tehrantimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Tehran Times reports remarks by the IRGC Navy commander, Ali Ozmaei, made during visits to the families of Iranian personnel killed in the war, and attributes his claim of a US pullback to him throughout. The headline rounds his '600 to 700 kilometers' up to a flat 700. Nothing else in the article misleads.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “US forces have moved 700 kilometers away”

    Why this matters
    The headline gives the distance as a single figure, 700 kilometres.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Ozmaei put the US pullback at 700 kilometres.
    The context
    In the body Ozmaei gives a range of 600 to 700 kilometres. The headline keeps only the top of his range. The claim stays attributed to him, so the effect is small.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“have moved 600 to 700 kilometers away from the Strait of Hormuz”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “The commander of the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy says US forces have moved 600 to 700 kilometers away”

    The article keeps the claim about US forces in Ozmaei's mouth from the first line, so the reader knows it is his account and not an established fact.

  • “He met the families of martyrs Ghodrat Zarangari, Abbas Eslami, Abdolreza Golzari and Javad Raoufi-Moqaddam”

    The article names the Iranian dead whose families were visited, rather than leaving them as a number.

  • “Iranian personnel killed in the Ramadan War”

    The article uses 'killed' for the deaths and does not write them out.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Tehran Times

  1. 24 OctIran has sufficient forex reserves to fund imports through end of Trump term, CBI chief says0.0
  2. 23 OctBeijing’s priority is peaceful coexistence between Iran and neighbors 6.0
  3. 23 OctIRGC Spokesman: US has suffered strategic defeats in war with Iran0.0
  4. 23 OctIran urges end to double standards in IAEA’s implementation of its statute3.0
  5. 23 OctIran will not resume talks until its conditions are met: top security official3.0

Everything we scored from Tehran Times