Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Can military action topple ?

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Figures in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's inner circle and senior members of Israel's defense establishment believe that the Iranian regime cannot be overthrown through military force alone, Kan News reported on Sunday evening. According to the report, one individual close to Netanyahu recently expressed skepticism that a military operation could bring about a change of government in Tehran, arguing that such action could damage the regime's capabilities without removing it from power.

The assessment differs from Netanyahu's recent statements, in which he called for completing the mission of toppling the Iranian regime during the remaining two years of US President Donald Trump's term. However, Netanyahu himself expressed a similar position in March, when he emphasized that responsibility for changing Iran's leadership ultimately rests with its citizens. "Our aspiration is to bring the Iranian people to cast off the yoke of tyranny.

Ultimately, it depends on them," Netanyahu said at the time. Earlier on Sunday, President Trump told the press that no American strike against Iran was expected that day. Meanwhile, Al Jazeera reported that Qatari mediators had arrived in Tehran for discussions. On Friday evening, Kan News reported that the Israeli and American militaries had made preparations for another operation against Iran, the third such potential military campaign within approximately six months.

However, no attack plan had received final approval. The preparations followed Trump's instructions to US Central Command to develop options for striking Iran, without specifying a date for carrying out an operation. The directive also prompted increased vigilance within Israel's defense establishment. Last week, Kan News reported that Israeli security officials had raised objections to conducting an attack on Iran before the upcoming elections, concerned that such an operation could be viewed as political interference in the electoral process.

Officials also noted that a military campaign could affect the timing of the elections, necessitate extensive reservist mobilization, and have other consequences. These concerns were also raised during discussions between IDF Chief of Staff LTG Eyal Zamir and his American counterpart.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports a Kan News account that people close to Netanyahu and senior defence figures doubt military force alone can bring down Iran's government, alongside reports of US and Israeli strike preparations. The body mostly attributes its claims, but the headline calls Iran's government a 'regime' in the outlet's own voice and states the doubts as fact without naming Kan.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iran's regime”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls Iran's government 'Iran's regime' in Arutz Sheva's own voice, not inside a quotation.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes 'regime' as a neutral description, carrying the verdict of the Israeli officials the article reports.
    The context
    In the body the word comes from the people being paraphrased, Netanyahu and his circle. In the headline it is the outlet's own label. 'Iran's government' would report the same question without adopting one side's term.

    Show it in the article

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Netanyahu's inner circle has doubts”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as fact that Netanyahu's inner circle has doubts. It drops the attribution to a single broadcaster's report.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the doubts are an established fact about the inner circle as a whole.
    The context
    The body rests on one Kan News report. Its concrete example is a single unnamed individual close to Netanyahu.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Kan News reported on Sunday evening”
    • Elsewhere in the article“one individual close to Netanyahu recently expressed skepticism”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Kan News reported on Sunday evening”

    The central claim is clearly attributed to its source, not stated as the outlet's own knowledge.

  • “the Israeli and American militaries had made preparations for another operation against Iran”

    It names who is preparing the strikes rather than hiding the actors.

  • “no attack plan had received final approval”

    It qualifies the preparations report so the reader does not take an attack as decided.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 26 OctKatz: Israel never planned pre-election strike on Iran8.2
  2. 26 OctCENTCOM chief declares: Strait of Hormuz is free from Iranian mines3.0
  3. 26 OctTrump on Iran: I’m going to make a great deal3.0
  4. 25 OctReport: Iran threatens to target senior American officials3.0
  5. 25 OctFearing surprise attack, IDF reinforces troops6.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News