Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 25 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Fearing surprise attack, IDF reinforces troops

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The IDF is on high alert across all fronts two days ahead of the elections, amid concerns about a possible security escalation and attempts by Iran and terrorist organizations to launch a surprise attack or carry out attacks. Kan News reported that, as part of the preparations, additional forces have been deployed, readiness levels have been raised in the Air Force and air defense systems, and leave has been canceled in military units.

Alongside the heightened alert, the IDF is holding a large-scale exercise today and tomorrow across northern and central Israel, involving the Air Force and four divisions. The exercise will simulate a surprise attack on multiple fronts simultaneously, including terrorist infiltrations by land and air, the defense of communities, and a rapid transition from defensive to offensive operations. The exercise involves the Northern Command's 210th Division, the Judea and Samaria Division, the 98th Division, and the Central Command's 96th Division.

Ground forces and the Air Force will practice coordinated operations, incorporating lessons learned from the October 7 attacks. The IDF stressed that the exercise was planned in advance as part of its annual training program and is not being held in response to any specific intelligence warning. Nevertheless, it comes amid heightened vigilance and concerns about potential security developments on several fronts. IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir has made clear that the military is on alert across all fronts to thwart threats and ensure that the elections proceed as scheduled, without outside interference.

According to the report, one of the main concerns is that a miscalculation by one of the parties could trigger a security escalation, particularly on the Iranian and Hezbollah fronts. Meanwhile, , the IDF and Shin Bet security agency are continuing their large-scale operation in Hebron following at Yehuda Junction. Two soldiers from the Home Front Command's Ari Battalion were killed in the attack, and three others were wounded.

The operation involves forces from the Duvdevan and Maglan units, paratroopers, reservists from the Givati Reconnaissance Unit, and Judea and Samaria Border Police officers. The forces are operating on the basis of intelligence provided by the Shin Bet and the Judea Brigade command. So far, troops have searched approximately 200 sites in and around Hebron. No weapons or terrorist infrastructure have been found at the sites searched, and ten suspects have been arrested.

The operation is focused on . According to the IDF's assessment, the clan is affiliated with Hamas, and the two terrorists who carried out the attack were members of the clan. The investigation into the attack at Yehuda Junction is also continuing. Investigators are examining the sequence of events, the deployment of forces, and the circumstances in which the soldiers were hit.

They are also exploring the possibility that rather than acting alone.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Israel National News reports Israeli army readiness before the elections and a large raid in Hebron, but places Hebron only in "Judea and Samaria" in its own voice. It never says the city is in the occupied West Bank or that the 2,000 people whose area is being searched are Palestinians living under an occupation the ICJ has found unlawful. It also calls the Yehuda Junction attackers terrorists in its own narration.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Serious

    “in Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    The outlet places the Hebron operation "in Judea and Samaria" in its own voice, using the Israeli state's name for the territory. It uses no other name for it anywhere.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Hebron to be an ordinary part of Israel, where the army and Shin Bet are policing their own territory.
    The context
    Hebron is in the occupied West Bank. The ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds that Israel's occupation there is unlawful. The article reports a military operation in occupied territory and never uses the words occupied, occupation or West Bank.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “occupation” and “West Bank”.

    Show it in the article

    “the area inhabited by the Ja'aba clan, which numbers approximately 2,000 people”

    Why this matters
    The outlet describes the people whose homes are being searched only as a clan of about 2,000. It never says they are Palestinians or that they live under military occupation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees a security sweep of one suspect family network, with no sense of who these people are or under what authority troops enter their homes.
    The context
    The people of Hebron live under an occupation the ICJ has ruled unlawful. The outlet's own reporting says troops searched about 200 sites and found nothing. The word Palestinian appears nowhere in the article.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion holds that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“No weapons or terrorist infrastructure have been found at the sites searched”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Meanwhile, in the occupied West Bank, Israeli forces and the Shin Bet are continuing a large-scale operation in Hebron, focused on the area where about 2,000 Palestinians of the Ja'aba clan live, following Friday's attack at Yehuda Junction.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Friday's deadly terrorist attack”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the attack on soldiers at Yehuda Junction a "terrorist attack" in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the terrorism label as an established fact rather than the Israeli army's description.
    The context
    The only source the article gives for who the attackers were is the army's assessment, which it attributes in S19. The people killed and wounded were soldiers, which the article itself reports.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to the IDF's assessment”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Two soldiers from the Home Front Command's Ari Battalion were killed”

    Show it in the article

    “the terrorists received assistance from others”

    Why this matters
    Here the outlet drops even the attribution it gave in S19 and calls the attackers "the terrorists" as plain narration.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the army's label as the outlet's own settled finding.
    The context
    The article says the investigation is still continuing and investigators are still establishing the sequence of events.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The investigation into the attack at Yehuda Junction is also continuing”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 25 OctReport: Iran threatens to target senior American officials3.0
  2. 25 OctIran reports meeting with Mojtaba Khamenei amid questions over his whereabouts8.0
  3. 25 OctReport: US military has strike plans ready for Iran3.0
  4. 24 OctIran reportedly ready to target submarine cables if war resumes3.0
  5. 24 OctUS intelligence warns of advanced Iranian assassination plots6.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News