The Jewish Chronicle, by Jamie Shapiro, on UK Politics, 6 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

‘Rivers to the Seas’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

A pro-Palestine arts event . The five-day series of film screenings, poetry readings and workshops, “From the rivers to the seas”, is set to take place at Glasgow arts venue Tramway between November 11 and November 15. The title of the event – which aims to bring together different groups working on “anti-colonial resistance” – has prompted outrage, with critics alleging it is a call for the destruction of the Jewish state.

“The SNP’s arts quango might want to wash its hands of this show with its antisemitic title,” Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay told the Mail. Elliot Davis, former chairman of the Judeo-Christian Alliance, said “From the rivers to the seas” was “virulent hate speech as it calls for the eradication of the tiny Jewish state of Israel”. The organising non-profit, Arika, has received £911,950 in funding from .

Adverts for the event say it will include artists, academics, activists and writers discussing Palestine, colonialism, abolitionism and social justice. The website reads: “How do we think with, and from, Palestine on a planetary scale? Can we connect different sites of anti-colonial resistance, without flattening them through analogy, equivalence or universalism? “Colonial violence is constantly recomposed as it adapts to different contexts.

Each instance prototypes new mechanisms of extraction, but also insurgent forms of resistance, changing how past, present and future ones are understood. “How then can we learn in the back and forth between different colonial situations and the struggles of refusal that resist them?” Arika said the festival was a show of solidarity with Palestinians amid “an ongoing genocide”. Findlay said: “Creative Scotland has bankrolled this arts quango with almost a million pounds of taxpayers’ cash so they must bear some responsibility and accountability.

"John Swinney’s SNP government also can’t dodge its role in diverting vast sums of public money being spent on highly questionable projects like this.” Davis said: “It’s a sad day for Scotland that we are governed by a political party, the SNP, which literally supports and funds Jew-hate racism via Creative Scotland.” Creative Scotland told the JC it did not influence the programming decisions made by event organisers. “We support Arika through our multi-year funding programme, which provides stable funding over three years for the operations and creative programmes of 262 cultural organisations across Scotland,” it said.

Tramway, where the event is being held, is also funded by Creative Scotland but run by council-funded Glasgow Life. A spokesman for Glasgow Life told the JC: “This is the 12th time Arika has programmed a festival at Tramway. Glasgow Life is committed to maintaining its political neutrality and while we saw the five-day programme in advance, we noted that the themes are already being discussed daily around the world and did not ask for it to be changed.

“We have also in the recent past, provided a venue for Glasgow Friends of Israel, demonstrating we are here for all Glasgow’s communities. “Tramway provides £4,000 to the programme and incurs approximately £5,000 for staff costs and marketing related to the five-day programme.” Israel has consistently denied allegations of genocide. A spokesperson for Arika said: "We are not antisemitic. People from many religions are included in our programme, including Jewish colleagues.

Inspired by the long history of Jewish Anti-Zionism, we refute the conflation of Zionism with all of Judaism. “Arika does not intend to offend the Jewish community. We are critical of the Israeli government’s Zionist practices. These are different things. "The UK Prime Minister has made a similar distinction: ‘Our sanctions aren’t about the Israeli people, but about the unacceptable policies of the Israeli government’.” The spokesperson also suggested that since the phrase “from the river to sea” was present in an early Likud manifesto, “to therefore call for freedom for all Palestinians on that land using the same words seems totally natural”.

Responding to a request for comment, the Scottish government said Creative Scotland had no role in the programming decisions made by the organisations that it funds.

Read the original article on thejc.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jewish Chronicle's headline and opening line say the Glasgow event itself was handed almost £1 million, when its own later sentences show that sum is three years of operating funding to the organiser, Arika, and that the venue put £4,000 into the programme. In its own voice it adopts the Scottish Tory leader's 'SNP quango' label for Creative Scotland. It runs critics' antisemitism charges first and leaves Arika's answer until near the end.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “event handed almost £1 million in Scottish taxpayers’ cash”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the event was 'handed almost £1 million'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Scottish public bodies paid close to a million pounds for this five-day festival.
    The context
    The body says the money is multi-year funding to the organising non-profit, Arika, for its operations and programmes over three years. The only sum tied to this programme is the venue's £4,000, plus about £5,000 in staff and marketing costs.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The organising non-profit, Arika, has received £911,950 in funding”
    • Elsewhere in the article“provides stable funding over three years for the operations and creative programmes of 262 cultural organisations across Scotland”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Tramway provides £4,000 to the programme”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Glasgow festival organiser Arika receives £911,950 in multi-year Creative Scotland funding, as critics attack event's title.

  2. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “has received nearly £1 million in Scottish taxpayers’ cash”

    Why this matters
    The Jewish Chronicle opens by saying the arts event itself 'has received nearly £1 million'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes this one festival was funded to the tune of nearly £1 million.
    The context
    The article's own sources show the figure is Arika's three-year funding for all its operations, under a programme covering 262 organisations. The festival's direct funding named in the article is £4,000 from Tramway.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The organising non-profit, Arika, has received £911,950 in funding”
    • Elsewhere in the article“We support Arika through our multi-year funding programme”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Tramway provides £4,000 to the programme”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The organiser of a pro-Palestine arts festival, Arika, receives £911,950 over three years from Creative Scotland for its operations. The venue says it puts £4,000 into this programme.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “SNP quango Creative Scotland”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Jewish Chronicle calls Creative Scotland an 'SNP quango'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the arts funder is a party body run by the SNP.
    The context
    'The SNP's arts quango' is the Scottish Tory leader's phrase. The Scottish government and Creative Scotland both say the funder plays no part in programming decisions.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The SNP’s arts quango might want to wash its hands”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Creative Scotland had no role in the programming decisions”

    Show it in the article

  4. Buries the reply

    Minor

    “accused of calling for the eradication of Israel”

    Why this matters
    The Jewish Chronicle leads with the charge that the event calls for 'the eradication of Israel'. It then runs critics' antisemitism charges in S3 to S5 and S14 to S16 before giving Arika's answer near the end.
    The impression it gives
    A reader who stops early never learns that the organisers deny antisemitism and explain the phrase as a call for freedom for all Palestinians.
    The context
    Arika's rebuttal goes directly to the charge in the opening line but appears only from S25 onward.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“We are not antisemitic.”
    • Elsewhere in the article“call for freedom for all Palestinians on that land”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jewish Chronicle

  1. 5 NovSheffield Labour defies orders to break Green coalition over Zionism is racism motion3.0
  2. 5 NovSupreme Court defers verdict on Palestine Action ban appeal0.0
  3. 5 NovMet settles claim by pro-Palestine activist over terror arrest6.0
  4. 5 NovHatzola, Shomrim, and CST honoured by Barnet Council for exceptional service to borough0.0
  5. 5 NovExclusive: Council to return £120k to Jewish safety after JC reveals plan to spend on ‘street art’3.0

Everything we scored from The Jewish Chronicle