Al Jazeera English, on Iran, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iranians brace for renewed attacks after Israeli, US elections

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Israelis have gone to the polls to decide whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will remain in power. On November 3, midterm elections in the United States will take place and likely impact President Donald Trump’s final years in office. Many Iranians are watching both elections closely, knowing that the way Israelis and Americans vote could have serious consequences for their future. Since Israel and the US launched on Iran on February 28, Iranians have experienced bombings, a blockade and sanctions.

Recommended Stories list of 3 items list 1 of 3 Palestinian citizens of Israel can vote, but cannot expect change list 2 of 3 Palestine weekly: West Bank under siege as Israelis go to the polls list 3 of 3 Israel election results 2026: When will we know who won and what’s next? end of list But despite a sharp decrease in US and Israeli attacks since a memorandum of understanding was reached between Washington and Tehran in June, the threat of war has re-emerged.

Many political commentators believe that the US and Israel could restart the war after the elections, and Iranians are anticipating further strikes. “I haven’t followed the Israeli election very closely. But I think there will be more fighting whether Netanyahu wins or Eisenkot or someone else,” 37-year-old Tehran resident Sajad told Al Jazeera, asking to remain anonymous due to security reasons. He believes that the rhetoric of Israeli officials signals that their ambition in the war is still for the overthrow of the Islamic Republic, which has controlled Iran since a 1979 revolution.

This has gained some support from Iranians inside and outside the country, who are opposed to the government. But cyber intelligence operations by both Israel and Iran make it difficult to accurately gauge online reactions to the prospect of Netanyahu winning another election. A bus bearing a campaign poster featuring Israeli Prime Minister and Likud party chairman Benjamin Netanyahu alongside US President Donald Trump drives through Jerusalem on October 26, 2026, on the eve of Israel’s legislative elections [Ahmad Gharabli/AFP] Iranian authorities have described pro-Israeli Iranians as “homeland sellers” and continue to severely punish any perceived cooperation with Israel based on national security charges.

Advertisement They also fully blame the US and Israel for Iran’s nationwide protests in January, during which thousands of civilians are believed to have been killed. The United Nations says Iranian security forces committed crimes against humanity while cracking down on the protests. Shayan, a 32-year-old Tehran resident, said he believes that any Iranians who might have hoped for the overthrow of the government at the start of the war are disillusioned after witnessing US and Israeli conduct since then, with thousands of civilians killed and the US blockade and sanctions hitting most people’s incomes.

“I think some people’s viewpoints adjusted after some of the comments from the US and Israel, and after they bombed infrastructure that we need to live, like oil and gas, power and steel,” he told Al Jazeera. “I think most Iranians don’t have a choice in the matter, but want some stability and peace.” President Trump has threatened to bring about the “death of a civilisation” in Iran and suggested the country’s map may look different after the war.

He has also repeatedly threatened to launch more major strikes against Iran’s power plants, bridges and other civilian infrastructure if hostilities resume. US media report that the country’s military is prepared to attack over the coming days if an order is given. The other option Trump has threatened is prolonging a naval blockade of Iran’s southern ports in place since July, which has stopped the country’s oil exports and significantly disrupted trade.

Together with some of the most stringent sanctions imposed against any country, the US measures have made Iranians poorer and more isolated from the international community. The Netanyahu government has also threatened to strike Iranian infrastructure again, including energy facilities. Defence Minister Israel Katz has repeatedly said in recent months that he wants to send Iran “back into the Stone Age”. His election opponents and other prominent opposition figures, including Eisenkot, Naftali Bennett, Yair Lapid and Yair Golan, have all cheered the US-Israeli attacks on Iran both during the current war and during last year’s 12-day war.

They have also been united in wanting to remove Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles from Iran and dismantle the country’s nuclear programme. Another goal is eliminating the Tehran-backed “axis of resistance” of armed forces who oppose Israel and the US across the region. Advertisement Eisenkot, for instance, has supported Netanyahu’s military strikes against Iran and praised Trump’s decision to launch attacks as courageous.

But he also says that military operations cannot realistically overthrow the Islamic Republic, and that change must come from Iranians themselves. Some Iranians have been mentally preparing themselves for conflict when the elections end. Some Iranians said they have established groups with friends living in different parts of the country to warn each other of imminent strikes if they hear fighter jets flying overhead. Some of the groups are in domestic messaging apps or over text message since Iranian authorities have said they will impose more internet and communication shutdowns if deemed necessary.

“In all seriousness, 90 million people have our eyes to the sky to see when there will be war. Damn this life we’ve lived,” a user named Ali wrote on X.

Read the original article on aljazeera.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Al Jazeera reports that Iranians fear renewed US and Israeli attacks once the Israeli and US elections are over. It names who launched the war and attributes threats to the people who made them. Two small problems remain: in its own voice it calls the war "unprovoked", and it states that Israel's government and opposition alike share a war aim of overthrowing Iran's government, a claim that other reporting on Eisenkot complicates.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “an unprovoked war”

    Why this matters
    The word "unprovoked" gives the outlet's own verdict on why the war began. It is not attributed to Iran or to anyone else.
    The impression it gives
    That it is an established, uncontested fact that nothing preceded or prompted the US and Israeli attack.
    The context
    The article attributes no source for the verdict and gives no facts about how the war began beyond the date and the attackers. The outlet's earlier report described the same start plainly, naming the attackers without a verdict word.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Israeli politicians, both the government and opposition, are generally united on the war aims of overthrowing the Iranian establishment, but differ on the method.”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, the outlet assigns one war aim, overthrowing Iran's government, to the whole Israeli political class, opposition included. No source is given.
    The impression it gives
    That every leading Israeli opposition figure, including Eisenkot, holds regime overthrow as a war aim.
    The context
    The article itself reports that Eisenkot says military operations cannot realistically overthrow the Islamic Republic. Other coverage reports that he considers regime change not an achievable goal. A shared aim across the whole political class is the outlet's generalisation, not a sourced fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “The United Nations says Iranian security forces committed crimes against humanity while cracking down on the protests.”

    It names the actor responsible for the protest killings and attributes the finding to the UN, rather than leaving the deaths without an actor.

  • “Defence Minister Israel Katz has repeatedly said in recent months that he wants to send Iran “back into the Stone Age”.”

    It quotes a named Israeli official's own words on targeting Iran, so the reader sees the threat directly and attributed.

  • “US media report that the country’s military is prepared to attack over the coming days if an order is given.”

    It marks the claim of imminent attack plans as reported by US media rather than stating it as the outlet's own fact.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Jazeera English

  1. 27 OctQatar’s Emir meets Iran’s Pezeshkian in Moscow3.0
  2. 26 OctMecca defence alliance members in Tehran to defuse Iran-US, Yemen tensions8.0
  3. 26 OctOfficials from Mecca pact states to hold talks in Iran amid regional tensions3.0
  4. 24 OctIran says won’t allow US warships to get close as Trump ponders new attacks3.0
  5. 24 OctIs Iran planning attacks on Americans; why is the US on alert?3.0

Everything we scored from Al Jazeera English