We do not republish articles from Newsweek. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Newsweek gives a careful, well-sourced account of the Santa Cruz beach and wharf closure, attributing its warnings to the National Weather Service and city officials. Its headline says 35-foot waves hit and California beaches close, while the body reports only a forecast of 25 to 35 feet and one city's closure.
Headline goes beyond the article
Minor
“California beaches close as 35-foot waves hit”
Why this matters
The headline says "California beaches close" and that "35-foot waves hit", as if waves of that size had already struck and beaches across the state had shut.
The impression it gives
A reader believes 35-foot waves have already battered the coast and that California's beaches in general are closed.
The context
The body reports a forecast of 25 to 35 feet, and the only closure it reports is the City of Santa Cruz's. Other coverage the same day shows Pismo Beach kept its beaches open and closed only its pier.
How we know
Elsewhere in the article“large breaking waves reaching 25 to 35 feet forecast for the coast”
Elsewhere in the article“The City of Santa Cruz closed the city’s beaches”
“According to the federal NWS there is a “very high” risk of people drowning over the weekend.”
It attributes the drowning risk to the named forecasting agency and quotes its own wording rather than inflating the danger.
“with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration saying there is a 60 percent chance of a “historic event exceeding previous El Niños dating back to 1950.””
It gives the forecast as a sourced probability with its uncertainty intact, not as a certainty.
“surf heights of 25 to 35 feet accompanied by a high risk of sneaker waves and rip currents”
The body quotes the forecast figures exactly and names the specific hazards the forecasters warned of.