Antiwar.com opinion piece, on Iran, 10 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

US Bases Damage by Iran: $19.94 Billion

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 findingSee it marked on antiwar.com

Reprinted from World BEYOND War : World BEYOND War has just published a new report by Mohammed M.A. Abunahel and David Swanson called The Damage Done to U.S. Bases in the War on Iran: Documenting Attacks, Assessing Damage, and Estimating Financial Losses (full report here). The estimated cost of replacing U.S. military property either completely destroyed or severely damaged by Iranian attacks, according to the calculations in the report, is $19.94 billion.

When we read — not counting economic impacts or lost opportunity costs. This report documents the damage done by Iranian attacks on both U.S. bases and on non-U.S. buildings and people in Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, Cyprus, and Israel. According to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio the United States attacked Iran because Israel was planning to attack Iran, which was understood as likely to produce Iranian attacks on U.S. bases.

Through the course of the war, the U.S. government has used the bases it has maintained thousands of miles away from the United States to describe its attacks on Iran as “defensive.” Prior to the build-up to war, over 50,000 U.S. troops occupied dozens of bases in some of the world’s most brutal dictatorships — dictatorships propped up in part by these bases. When the U.S. Congress takes up legislation to authorize more military spending, the question must be carefully addressed: how much funding will go to rebuilding bases that make wars more likely and which have a high probability of being destroyed again, and is it fair to the host nations to impose bases that not only support unpopular rulers but also turn the surrounding areas into targets?

This report should have long since been produced by the U.S. government. Independent researchers should not have to make estimates based on news reports and what scraps of information the U.S. government sees fit to make public. Secrecy, like an archipelago of foreign bases, is one factor contributing to the initiation of wars. This report is offered in hopes of shining what light it can into the darkness of U.S. war policy. Piecing together the costs to U.S. government property is not meant to distract from the massive human and property costs that this war has inflicted on the people of Iran.

Rather, it is intended to help inform the U.S. public of one small part of what its government does with its money. If you liked this article, please support Antiwar.com. We are 100% reader-supported.

Read the original article on antiwar.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Antiwar.com reprints a World BEYOND War post estimating that Iranian attacks destroyed or badly damaged $19.94 billion of US military property, and the body attributes that figure to the report's calculations. The post adds the estimate to an unsourced $43.6 billion war cost, which is below the over $47 billion Pentagon estimate Antiwar.com itself reported on 28 October. That gap is minor.

Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “cost estimates for the U.S. role in the war of $43.6 billion, we can therefore correct that to an estimated $63.5 billion”

    Why this matters
    The post adds its base damage estimate to an unsourced $43.6 billion war cost and presents $63.5 billion as the corrected total.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes $43.6 billion as the current official cost and $63.5 billion as the corrected total.
    The context
    Antiwar.com reported on 28 October that the Pentagon's estimate was already over $47 billion and still left out base damage. The outlet also reported an independent estimate of around $103 billion for direct costs in the first 120 days alone. The post's starting figure is lower than the outlet's own latest reporting.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “according to the calculations in the report”

    The body attributes the damage figure to the report's own calculations rather than stating it as fact.

  • “the massive human and property costs that this war has inflicted on the people of Iran”

    The post does not let a tally of US property losses stand in for the war's harm. It names the cost to people in Iran.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Antiwar.com

  1. 10 NovIran’s Security Chief Says No Talks Underway With US0.0
  2. 10 NovTrump Claims There’s ‘Momentum’ Toward Ending War as Iran Says US ‘Manufacturing Fake News’ About Talks0.0
  3. 9 NovIran Responds to Rubio’s Rejection of Its Peace Proposal6.0
  4. 8 NovKatz Says Israel’s War Against Iran Is ‘Not Complete’0.0
  5. 8 NovUS Bombs Commercial Ship as CENTCOM Expands Iran Blockade to Land Routes0.0

Everything we scored from Antiwar.com