Truthout, on Iran, 14 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israeli Intelligence Chief in DC, Reportedly Pushing Trump to Renew Iran Attacks

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee them marked on truthout.org

Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make a quick donation to Truthout today! The head of Israel’s foreign intelligence agency was in Washington , DC on Friday, reportedly trying to persuade the Trump administration to renew . Mossad Director Roman Gofman was scheduled to meet with CIA Director John Ratcliffe in the nation’s capital before traveling to Miami for talks with White House Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, according to reporting from Axios ’ Barak Ravid.

Other sources, including The Jerusalem Post , confirmed that Gofman was in Washington to discuss the Iran War. Gofman’s trip comes amid an increasingly public campaign by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to persuade US President Donald Trump to abandon diplomacy and return to military strikes on Iran. According to Axios , Trump has so far resisted Netanyahu’s demands, instead favoring continued economic pressure and a naval blockade while leaving open the possibility of a negotiated agreement.

Related Story Op-Ed | Politics & Elections To End Iran War, Democrats Need New Leadership — and a New Approach Democrats must now reject Schumer and Jeffries’s hawkish status quo on Iran and fully embrace diplomacy. By Golnar Nikpour , T ruthout November 13, 2026 “I could end it immediately,” Trump said Thursday of the 258-day war — a claim he has made dozens of times in one form or another. “At the request of the nations that I’m looking to protect, we are doing it a little bit longer… a little bit more civilly.”

The president claimed that leaders of countries including Saudi Arabia , Qatar , Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates , and Bahrain said they preferred that the US maintain the current approach rather than resume fighting. Netanyahu had reportedly been lobbying Trump to resume strikes immediately after the US midterm elections , in which the Iran War played a major role in Republicans ’ losing control of Congress, according to exit polls. Israel’s domestic political turmoil may also be playing a part in .

His Likud-led far-right bloc lost its parliamentary majority in last month’s election, and opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot has a mandate to try to form a new government. Some Israeli opposition figures fear Netanyahu could initiate another attack on Iran — or provoke an Iranian response — in an effort to sabotage Eisenkot’s efforts and cling to power. Eisenkot, who met with Netanyahu for two hours Thursday, said Friday that he had warned the outgoing prime minister against taking advantage of the political transition to pursue military objectives.

Trump’s own rhetoric has become increasingly bellicose. On Thursday, he said that he had “no hesitation” about using military force against Iran and that renewed strikes were possible “right now” if he decided to give the order. In a separate Truth Social post, he declared: “We don’t need a deal with Iran. Those days have long since passed.” Thousands of Iranians — including more than 3,500 civilians, at least 380 of them children — have been killed and tens of thousands more wounded by US and Israeli attacks since February 28, according to Iranian and international officials.

More than 20 US troops and dozens of people in Gulf Arab states have been killed in Iranian counterattacks. An important fundraising appeal: 5 Days to raise $39,000 Donations are down for Truthout at a time when media is under immense pressure. Google’s AI search has driven our traffic down by 15 percent, Trump is arresting journalists, and many independent media organizations face heartbreaking cutbacks and closures. At the same time, movement media is vital in the fight against Trump’s authoritarian reign.

Our mandate to tell the truth, share strategies for resistance, and speak against fascism is ever more urgent in this deluge of political censorship and misinformation. Yet, we are struggling to meet our publishing costs when our work is so urgently needed. We are fundraising right now for those basic operating expenses — we need $39,000 in the next 5 days. If you can support Truthout with a one-time or monthly donation, you will make a significant impact on our work.

Anything you can do makes a difference. Share Share via Facebook Facebook Circle Icon Share via Bluesky Bluesky Circle Icon Share via Flipboard Flipboard Circle Icon Share via Mail Mail Circle Icon Share via Print More Share via Threads Share via Reddit Reddit Cirlce Icon Share via Pocket Pocket Circle Icon Share via Linkedin LinkedIn Circle Icon Share via Twitter Twitter Circle Icon This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license.

It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source. Brett Wilkins Brett Wilkins is a staff writer for Common Dreams .

Read the original article on truthout.org (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Truthout reports Mossad chief Roman Gofman's visit to Washington and Netanyahu's push for renewed strikes on Iran. It names US and Israeli attacks as the cause of thousands of Iranian deaths and attributes the claims it reports. Its faults are minor: it calls the war 'illegal' in its own voice with no source, and it calls Netanyahu's conduct 'machinations' when the article only reports that opposition figures fear his motives.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “the illegal US-Israeli war of choice against Iran”

    Why this matters
    Truthout calls the war 'illegal' and a 'war of choice' in its own narration, with no court, legal body or named critic attached to either verdict.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the war's illegality as an established legal finding rather than a judgement.
    The context
    The article gives no source or ruling for the legal verdict, and the record supplied for this topic contains no finding on the legality of the Iran war. Other reports of the same visit state the facts without the verdict: the US and Israel launched the war on 28 February.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Netanyahu’s machinations”

    Why this matters
    Truthout describes Netanyahu's political conduct as 'machinations' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that Netanyahu is scheming for hidden ends.
    The context
    The same sentence only says the political turmoil 'may' be playing a part. The motive set out in S14 is attributed to 'Some Israeli opposition figures', so the verdict in 'machinations' goes beyond what the article shows.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Some Israeli opposition figures fear Netanyahu could initiate another attack”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Truthout

  1. 9 NovAggression Against Iran Has Been Bipartisan. Will Midterm Results Change That?3.0
  2. 3 NovUS Continues Strikes on Iran Despite Trump Claims That War Is Over3.0
  3. 31 OctAs US and Israel Plot Iran Escalation, Regional Powers Scramble to Avert It6.0
  4. 29 OctSenator Briefed on Trump’s Iran War Plans Warns of “Devastating Escalation”3.0
  5. 28 OctCost of Iran War Jumps to $47 Billion — a Figure Believed to Be an Underestimate0.0

Everything we scored from Truthout