Metro, on UK Politics, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Exact dates London Underground will be hit by strikes over the Christmas period

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Under the plans, drivers face increased time spent driving trains, longer duties, earlier starts and later finishes, the union says (Picture: Sinai Noor/Shutterstock) London Underground drivers are staging a series of 24-hour strikes over the Christmas period. The Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT) said walkouts will start on November 26 and continue into the new year over an ongoing dispute over a four-day work week being implemented.

Under the plans, drivers face increased time spent driving trains, longer duties, earlier starts and later finishes, the union says. The 24-hour strikes will begin at noon on November 26, December 17 and 19, January 4 and 6, and February 17, 23 and 25. RMT general secretary Eddie Dempsey said: ‘London Underground is attempting to dress up a wholesale attack on drivers’ working conditions as a voluntary four-day week. ‘But there is nothing voluntary about a scheme that forces drivers to give up existing protections whether they work four days or five, and threatens those who refuse with displacement from their depots. ‘Our members are being asked to spend more time driving trains, accept longer and more unpredictable shifts and surrender agreements that have been negotiated and defended over many years.’

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The RMT also warned that the proposals could pave the way for hundreds of job cuts, citing initial Bakerloo line rosters that show significant staffing reductions. Metro omits this. With the article ending on Aslef's line that the strike is 'designed to stop people having the choice', a reader may think the dispute is only about shift patterns and not also about jobs.

How we know

The rival union Aslef strongly supported the four-day work week, calling it a ‘once in a lifetime opportunity for workers’. Finn Brennan, Aslef’s full-time organiser on London Underground, said: ‘We are surprised that the RMT has, once again, decided to take strike action to try to prevent Underground drivers moving to a four-day week on a voluntary basis. ‘The voluntary four-day week gives Tube train drivers an extra 35 days off every year, with rosters based on a 34-hour week in return for some changes to working conditions and moving to electronic, rather than paper-based, systems for booking on for duty. ‘We are in discussions with Transport for London about how the final details of this will work in practice. ‘Management have agreed that anyone who wants to keep working a five-day week will be able to do so without suffering any detriment, and we will be holding them to that. ‘A strike designed to stop people having the choice of a shorter working week and more time off is a strange choice to make.’

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk. For more stories like this, check our news page.

Read the original article on metro.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Metro gives the strike dates accurately and quotes both unions at length, attributing each side's claims to them. It does state, in its own voice and with no source, that workers have left the RMT 'in droves' for Aslef. It also leaves out the RMT's warning, reported the same day, that the plan could mean hundreds of job cuts.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Tube workers in support of the work week have left RMT in droves, choosing to take their union membership to Aslef.”

    Why this matters
    Metro states in its own voice that Tube workers have left the RMT 'in droves' for Aslef. It gives no figure, no source and no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the RMT is losing large numbers of members over this dispute, which undercuts the strike before any figures are shown.
    The context
    The article offers nothing to support the claim: no membership numbers and no one who said it. It sits between two passages promoting Aslef's position and reads as that side's case told in Metro's voice. None of the same day's coverage reports any such exodus.

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The RMT also warned that the proposals could pave the way for hundreds of job cuts, citing initial Bakerloo line rosters that show significant staffing reductions. Metro omits this. With the article ending on Aslef's line that the strike is 'designed to stop people having the choice', a reader may think the dispute is only about shift patterns and not also about jobs.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “The 24-hour strikes will begin at noon on November 26, December 17 and 19, January 4 and 6, and February 17, 23 and 25.”

    Metro gives the full list of strike dates and start times, matching the dates announced by the RMT and reported elsewhere the same day.

  • “the union says”

    Metro attributes the RMT's account of the changes to drivers' duties to the union instead of stating it as fact.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Metro

  1. 5 NovJob adverts to be legally required to include salary information0.0
  2. 5 NovDrunk e-bike riders could be fined under proposed crackdown0.0
  3. 5 NovThe 3 types of 'normalised' porn being banned from tomorrow3.0
  4. 4 NovUK's longest running road project will now pass 100 years after further delay0.0
  5. 4 NovDanny Tommo faces trial next year over Dover migrant centre claims0.0

Everything we scored from Metro